Advertisement

Conventional buckling surgery or primary vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with multiple breaks

  • Filiz AfrashiEmail author
  • Tansu Erakgun
  • Cezmi Akkin
  • Mahmut Kaskaloglu
  • Jale Mentes
Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Background

There is controversy about the most appropriate operating methods for complicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) including multiple tears, and surgical techniques may be changed according to the preference of the surgeon. In this retrospective study, we compared the surgical results of conventional buckling surgery and vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for rhegmatogenous (RD) with multiple breaks.

Methods

Thirty patients who underwent scleral buckling surgery (group 1) and 22 patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade (group 2) as the primary surgery for rhegmatogenous RD with multiple breaks were included in this study. The follow-up period was longer than 6 months after surgery. The anatomical success rates and complications were evaluated for both groups.

Results

Retinal reattachment was achieved in 24 of 30 eyes (80%) in group 1 and in 20 of 22 eyes (90.9%) in group 2 after the initial surgery. In group 1, subretinal hemorrhage developed due to the drainage of subretinal fluid in 2 eyes (6.6%) intraoperatively. Elevated intraocular pressure (3.3%), ocular motility disturbances (13.2%), and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (3.3%) were seen in the postoperative period. In group 2, iatrogenic breaks (7.3%) and lens damage (9.09%) occurred during the operation. Macular pucker (4.5%), postoperative cataract progression (22.7%), ocular hypertension (9.09%) and PVR (9.09%) were noted postoperatively.

Conclusions

Both surgical procedures can achieve favorable and comparable anatomic outcomes in the majority of patients in the treatment of RD with multiple breaks. Intra-and postoperative complications are different in the two procedures.

Keywords

Retinal Detachment Subretinal Fluid Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Scleral Buckling Retinal Break 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ah-Fat FG, Sharma MC, Majıd MA, McGalliard JN, Wong D (1999) Trends in vitreoretinal surgery at a tertiary referral centre: 1987 to 1996. Br J Ophthalmol 83:396–398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Academy of Ophthalmology (1996) The repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 103:1313–1324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonnet M (1988) The development of severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy after retinal detachment surgery. Grade B: a determining risk factor. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 226:201–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burton RL, Cairns JD, Campbell WG, Heriot WJ, Heinze JB (1993) Needle drainage of subretinal fluid. A randomized clinical trial. Retina 13:13–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Bustros S, Thompson JT, Michels RG, Enger C, Rice TA, Glaser BM (1988) Nuclear sclerosis after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Am J Ophthalmol 105:160–164Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    el-Asrar AM (1997) Primary vitrectomy for bullous rhegmatogenous retinal detachments due to complex breaks. Br J Ophthalmol 7:322–326Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Escoffery RF, Olk RJ, Grand MG, Bonıuk I (1985) Vitrectomy without scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 99:275–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giard DS, Mimoun G, Karpouzas I, Montefiore G (1994) Clinical risk factors for proliferative viteoretinopathy after retinal detachment surgery. Retina 14:417–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hakin KN, Lavin MJ, Leaver PK (1993) Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 231:344–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heimann H, Bornfeld N, Friedrichs W, Helbig H, Kellner U, Korra A, Foerster MH (1996) Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234:561–568PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH (2001) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogeneous retinal detachment (SPR Study). Design issues and implications. PR Study Report No.1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:567–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoerauf H, Roider J, Herboth T, Hager A, Laqua H (1997) Outcome after vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and dense vitreous opacities. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 211:369–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lobes LA, Burton TC (1978) The incidence of macular pucker after retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 85:72–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Machemer R (1995) Reminescences after 25 years of pars plana vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 119:505–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton EW, Parel JM (1971) Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 75:813–820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Michels RG, Wilkinson CP, Rice TA (1990) Complicated types of retinal detachment. In: Klein EA (ed) Retinal detachment. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 625–760Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miki D, Emi K, Motokura M, Yamanishi S (1999) Survey of surgical indications and results of primary pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 43:120–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miki D, Hida T, Hotta K, Shinoda K, Hirakata A (2001) Comparison of scleral buckling and vitrectomy for retinal detachment resulting from flap tears in superior quadrants. Jpn J Ophthalmol 45:187–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ogura Y, Kitagawa K, Ogino N (1993) Prospective longitudinal studies on lens changes after vitrectomy—quantitative assessment by fluorophotometry and refractometry. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 97:627–631PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oshima Y, Yamanishi S, Sawa M, Motokura M, Harino S, Emi K (2000) Two-year follow-up study comparing primary vitrectomy with scleral buckling for macula-off rhegmatogeneous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:538–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pastor JC, de la Rua ER, Martin F (2002) Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: risk factors and pathobiology. Prog Retin Eye Res 21:127–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raymond GL, Lavin MJ, Dodd CL, McLeod D (1993) Suture needle drainage of subretinal fluid. Br J Ophthalmol 77:428–429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roider J, Hoerauf H, Hager A, Herboth T, Laqua H (2001) Conventional ablation surgery or primary vitrectomy in complicated retinal holes. Ophthalmologe 98:887–891CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schrader WF, Hamburger G, Lieb B, Hansen LL, Kommerel G (1995) Motility and binocular function after radial episcleral buckle. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 207:224–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sewell JJ, Knobloch WH, Eifrig DE (1974) Extraocular muscle imbalance after surgical treatment for retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 78:321–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Singh AK, Glaser BM, Lemor M, Michels RG (1986) Gravity-dependent distribution of retinal pigment epithelial cells dispersed into the vitreous cavity. Retina 2:77–80Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smiddy WE, Loupe DN, Michels RG, Enger C, Glaser BM, deBustros S (1989) Refractive changes after scleral buckling surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 107:1469–1471PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taner V, Minihan M, Williamson TH (2001) Management of inferior retinal breaks during pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 85:480–482Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    The Retina Society Terminology Commitee (1983) The classification of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 90:121–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thompson JT (1989) Kinetics of intraocular gases: disappearance of air, sulfur hexafluoride, and perfluoropropane after pars plana vitrectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 107:687–691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Uemura A, Nakao K (1995) A comparison between scleral buckling procedure and vitrectomy for the management of uncomplicated retinal detachment caused by posterior retinal break. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 99:1170–1174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wong D, Chignell AH, Inglesby DV, Little BC, Franks W (1992) The treatment of bullous rhegmatogeneous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 230:218–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yoshida A, Feke GT, Gren GJ, Goger DG, Matsuhashi M, Jalkh AE, McMeel JW (1983) Retinal circulatory changes after scleral buckling procedures. Am J Ophthalmol 95:182–188PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filiz Afrashi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Tansu Erakgun
    • 2
  • Cezmi Akkin
    • 2
  • Mahmut Kaskaloglu
    • 2
  • Jale Mentes
    • 2
  1. 1.Bornova, IzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of OphthalmologyEge University School of MedicineBornova, IzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations