Macular pigment density in healthy subjects quantified with a modified confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope
- 161 Downloads
In the industrialized world age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is the leading cause for legal blindness beyond the age of 65 years. Recent studies indicate that the density of the macular pigment (MP) may play a central role in the development and progression of age-related maculopathy (ARM). We present results of measurements of macular pigment density (MPD) with a modified confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope and compare macular pigment density values obtained from reflectance and autofluorescence images in healthy subjects.
A modified confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg) was optimised for fundus reflectance and autofluorescence images at 488 nm and 514 nm. For autofluorescence imaging a band pass barrier filter with a short wavelength cut off at 530 nm was used. MPD maps were obtained, and MPD was evaluated within two degrees around the foveal center. In this study we included 109 healthy subjects aged from 18–75 years.
Average MPD ranged between 0.16 density units (D.U.) and 0.22 D.U. depending on the techniques used for the measurement. Using the reflectance method the mean MPD was 0.16±0.06 D.U., whereas a MPD of 0.22±0.07 D.U. resulted from autofluorescence images with the 530-nm barrier filter.
This study demonstrates the good feasibility of MPD measurements with a modified confocal SLO. In agreement with previous studies we found higher macular pigment density values calculated from autofluorescence images than from reflectance images. We could not find any differences in MPD related to age and gender. Prospective longitudinal studies to verify the influence of MPD on the development and progression of ARM are needed.
KeywordsRetinal Pigment Epithelium Reflectance Image Macular Pigment Inner Limit Membrane Autofluorescence Image
- 1.Beatty S, Boulton M, Henson D, Koh HH, Murray IJ (1999) Macular pigment and age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol:867–877Google Scholar
- 6.Bird AC, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Chisholm IH, Coscas G, Davis MD, de Jong PTVM, Klaver CCW, Klein BEK, Klein R, Mitchell P, Sarks JP, Sarks SH, Soubrane G, Taylor HR, Vingerling JR (1995) An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 39:367–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Delcourt C, Cristol JP, Tessier F, Leger CL, Descomps B, Papoz L (1999) Age-related macular degeneration and antioxidant status in the POLA study. POLA Study Group. Pathologies Oculaires Liees a l'Age Arch Ophthalmol 117:1384–90Google Scholar
- 12.Delori FC (1993) Macular pigment density measured by reflectometry and fluorometry. In: Noninvasive assessment of the Visual System. OSA Technical Digest, pp 240–243Google Scholar
- 13.Delori FC, Goger DG, Hammond BR, Snodderly DM, Burns SA (2001) Macular pigment density measured by autofluorescence spectrometry: comparison with reflectometry and heterochromatic flicker photometry. J Opts Socm Am 18:1212–1230Google Scholar
- 16.Kirchhof B (1997) Surgical aspects of AMD, adjuvant techniques to restore visual function after macular surgery: pigment epithelial transplantation. Opthalmologica BelgicaGoogle Scholar
- 21.Schmidt-Erfurth U, Miller JW, Sickenberg M, Laqua H, Barbazetto I, Gragoudas ES, Zografos L, Piguet B, Pournaras CJ, Donati G, Lane AM, Birngruber R, van den Berg H, Strong HA, Manjuris U, Gray T, Fsadni M, Bressler NM (1999) Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization caused by age-related macular degeneration: results of retreatments in a phase 1 and 2 study. Arch Ophthalmol 117:1177–1187PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Snodderly DM (1995) Evidence for protection against age-related macular degeneration by carotenoids and antioxidant vitamins. Am J Clin Nutr 62 [Suppl 6]:1448S–1461SGoogle Scholar