Short-wavelength automated perimetry in patients with diabetes mellitus without macular edema

  • Andreas RemkyEmail author
  • Anke Weber
  • Stefan Hendricks
  • Kristina Lichtenberg
  • Oliver Arend
Clinical Investigation



The short-wavelength-sensitive (SWS) cone-mediated sensitivity is a sensitive indicator of functional changes of the macula in diabetic maculopathy. This study was performed to investigate whether functional losses of the macula are detectable in patients without a significant macular edema.


In 45 patients with diabetes mellitus with clear optical media and no macular edema, conventional white-on-white perimetry (WWP) and short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) were performed in the central 10-deg field. Fifty-eight healthy subjects ranging in age from 16 to 62 years served as controls. The two groups did not differ in age.


Variance analysis (ANOVA) revealed significantly lower sensitivity in patients with diabetes than in controls. SWAP thresholds were significantly more greatly reduced by diabetes than those of WWP (ANOVA interaction: P=0.003). Post-hoc testing revealed a sensitivity reduction of 2.8 dB (P=0.0003) in patients with diabetes for SWAP versus 0.46 for WWP (P=0.15). Subgroup analysis revealed that mean thresholds of SWAP and WWP predominantly were reduced in patients with advanced disease. In patients with no retinopathy, sensitivity was not affected at all.


SWS sensitivity may be affected in patients with diabetic retinopathy without clinically significant macular edema. Sensitivity loss was pronounced with increasing severity of retinopathy, reflecting the global status of the eye.


Visual Acuity Diabetic Retinopathy Macular Edema Diabetic Macular Edema Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Arend O, Wolf S, Jung F, et al (1991) Retinal microcirculation in patients with diabetes mellitus: dynamic and morphologic analysis of perifoveal capillary network. Br J Ophthalmol 75(9): 514–518Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arend O, Remky A, Evans DW, Stüber R, Harris A (1997) Contrast sensitivity loss is coupled with capillary drop out in diabetic patients with unaffected visual acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:1819–1824PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bek T, Lund-Andersen H (1990) Localised blood-retinal barrier leakage and retinal light sensitivity in diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 74:388–392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzén H (1997) A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75:368–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boycott B, Wassle BB (1991) Morphological classifications of bipolar cells of the primate retina. Eur J Neurosci 3:1069–1088PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bresnick GH (1988) Diabetic retinopathy viewed as a neurosensory disorder. Arch Ophthalmol 104:989–990Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bresnick GH, Condit R, Syrjala S, Palta M, Groo A, Korth K (1984) Abnormalities of the foveal avascular zone in diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 102(9): 1286–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bresnick GH, Condit R, Palta M (1985) Association of hue discrimination loss and diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 103:1317–1324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dacey DM, Lee BB (1994) The 'blue-on' opponent pathway in primate retina originates from a distinct bistratified ganglion cell type. Nature 367:731–735PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group (1985) Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 1. Arch Ophthalmol 103:1796–1806PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group (1991) Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS Report Number 12. Ophthalmology [Suppl] 98:823–833Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frisen FM (1976) A simple relationship between the probability distribution of visual acuity and the density of retinal output channels. Acta Ophthalmol 54:437–444Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Green FD, Ghafour IM, Allan D, Barrie T, McClure E, Foulds WS (1985) Color vision of diabetics. Br J Ophthalmol 69:533–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greenstein VC, Hood DC, Ritch R, Steinberger D, Carr RE (1989) S (blue) cone pathway vulnerability in retinitis pigmentosa, diabetes and glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:1732–1737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ham WT (1982) Action spectrum for retinal injury from near UV radiation in the aphakic monkey. Am J Ophthalmol 93:299–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harris A, Arend O, Danis RP, Evans D, Wolf S, Reim M (1996) Hyperoxia improves contrast sensitivity in early diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 80:209–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hood DC, Benimoff NI, Greenstein VC (1984) The response range of the blue-cone pathways: a source of vulnerability to disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:864–867PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hudson C, Flanagan JG, Turner GS, Chen HC, Young LB, McLeod D (1998) Short-wavelength sensitive visual field loss in patients with clinically significant diabetic macular oedema. Diabetologia 41:918–928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ismail GM, Whitaker D (1998) Early detection of changes in visual function in diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 18:3-12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD (1993) Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 111:645–650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lutze M, Bresnick GH (1994) Lens-corrected visual sensitivity and diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:649–655PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Normenausschuß Feinmechanik und Optik: DIN 58220 (1974–1990), Bl. 3 (1974) Sehschärfenbestimmung, Teil 1 (1988) Normsehzeichen, Teil 2 (1989) Anschluß von Sehzeichen, Teil 3 (1990) Prüfung für Gutachten, Teil 4 (1980) Nahvisusbestimmung, Teil 5 (1986) Allgemeine Sehtestung, Teil 6 (1988) Straßenverkehrsbezogener Sehtest. Deutsche Institut für Normung eV: Beuth B (ed)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Regan D (1984) Low-contrast letter charts in early diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 68:885–889PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Remky A, Arend O, Hendricks S (2000) Short-wavelength automated perimetry and capillary density in early diabetic maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:274–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Remky A, Lichtenberg K, Elsner AE, Arend O (2001) Short-wavelength automated perimetry in age-related maculopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 85:1432–1426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siik S, Chylack LT, Friend J, et al (1999) Lens autofluorescence and light scatter in relation to the lens opacities classification systems, LOCS III. Acta Ophthalmol 1999:77Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sokol S, Moskowitz A, Skarf B, Evans R, Molich M, Senior B (1985) Contrast sensitivity in diabetics with and without background retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 103:51–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sperling HG (1991) Vulnerability of the blue-sensitive mechanism. In: Foster D (ed) Inherited and acquired colour vision deficiencies: fundamental aspects on clinical studies, vol 7. McMillan, London, pp 72–87Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang CS, Cheng CY, Lee FL, Hsu WM, Liu JH (2001) Quantitative assessment of retinal thickness in diabetic patients with and without clinically significant macular edema using optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79:266–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Remky
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anke Weber
    • 1
  • Stefan Hendricks
    • 1
  • Kristina Lichtenberg
    • 1
  • Oliver Arend
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyMedical School of the Technical University (RWTH) of AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations