Advertisement

Differentiating societal costs of disability worsening in multiple sclerosis

Abstract

Background

In multiple sclerosis (MS), confirmed disability progression (CDP) can be either the result of progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) or relapse-associated worsening (RAW). However, the economic effect of PIRA and RAW on societal economic costs in patients with MS is not well understood.

Objective

To determine societal economic costs of patients achieving disease activity free status (DAF) and compare them with those having PIRA and RAW events.

Methods

We used a roving EDSS score analysis to detect PIRA and RAW events with confirmation after at least 6 months. We estimated the age-, gender-, EDSS-adjusted effects of PIRA and RAW on total, direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect societal economic costs. Patients achieving DAF were assigned to as reference.

Results

Overall, 1959 patients were analyzed. Total mean quarterly societal economic costs including disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) were 6929€ (SD: 2886€) per patient averaged over a period of 2 years. Excluding DMTs, patients achieving DAF had total mean quarterly costs of 1703€ (SD: 2489€). PIRA caused 29% (IRR: 1.29; CI 1.06–1.50, p < 0.05) higher total costs compared to DAF. On the contrary, RAW increased total costs by factor 1.56 (CI 1.30–1.87, p < 0.001). The effect of PIRA and RAW was striking for direct medical costs which increased by factor 1.48 (95% CI 1.13–1.95, p < 0.01) and 2.25 (95% CI 1.72–2.94, p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion

Disease progression increases societal economic costs significantly. Thus, delaying or even preventing disease progression in MS may reduce the societal economic burden of MS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Trisolini M, Honeycutt A, Wienr J, Lesesne S (2010) Global economic impact of multiple sclerosis. ΜSIF, London, United Kingdom, pp 22–68

  2. 2.

    Galea I, Ward-Abel N, Heesen C (2015) Relapse in multiple sclerosis. BMJ 350:h1765. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1765

  3. 3.

    Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GP, Noseworthy J, Carriere W, Baskerville J, Ebers GC (1989) The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability. Brain 112(Pt 1):133–146

  4. 4.

    Scalfari A, Neuhaus A, Daumer M, Muraro PA, Ebers GC (2014) Onset of secondary progressive phase and long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 85(1):67–75. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-304333

  5. 5.

    Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Giovannoni G, Arnold DL, Wang Q, Bernasconi C, Model F, Manfrini M, Belachew S, Hauser SL (2017) Ocrelizumab reduces disability progression independent of relapse activity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis [P654]. Mult Scler J 23(3_suppl):85–426

  6. 6.

    Uitdehaag BMJ (2018) Disability outcome measures in phase III clinical trials in multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs 32(6):543–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-018-0530-8

  7. 7.

    Wiendl H, Meuth SG (2015) Pharmacological approaches to delaying disability progression in patients with multiple sclerosis. Drugs 75(9):947–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-015-0411-0

  8. 8.

    Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33(11):1444–1452. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444

  9. 9.

    Kappos L, Wolinsky J, Giovannoni G, Arnold D, Wang Q, Bernasconi C, Model F, Manfrini M, Belachew S, Hauser S (2018) Relapse-associated worsening and progression independent of relapse activity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis in the Phase III OPERA I and OPERA II studies [P547]. Mult Scler 24(2_suppl):121–327

  10. 10.

    Inojosa H, Schriefer D, Ziemssen T (2020) Clinical outcome measures in multiple sclerosis: a review. Autoimmunity Rev (in press)

  11. 11.

    Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA, Cutter GR, Sørensen PS, Thompson AJ, Wolinsky JS, Balcer LJ, Banwell B, Barkhof F, Bebo B, Calabresi PA, Clanet M, Comi G, Fox RJ, Freedman MS, Goodman AD, Inglese M, Kappos L, Kieseier BC, Lincoln JA, Lubetzki C, Miller AE, Montalban X, O'Connor PW, Petkau J, Pozzilli C, Rudick RA, Sormani MP, Stüve O, Waubant E, Polman CH (2014) Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology 83(3):278–286. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000560

  12. 12.

    Kappos L, Butzkueven H, Wiendl H, Spelman T, Pellegrini F, Chen Y, Dong Q, Koendgen H, Belachew S, Trojano M (2018) Greater sensitivity to multiple sclerosis disability worsening and progression events using a roving versus a fixed reference value in a prospective cohort study. Mult Scler 24(7):963–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517709619

  13. 13.

    Flachenecker P, Kobelt G, Berg J, Capsa D, Gannedahl M, European Multiple Sclerosis P (2017) New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe: results for Germany. Mult Scler 23(2_suppl):78–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517708141

  14. 14.

    Haase R, Kern R, Akguen K, Wunderlich M, Dominik M, Ziemssen T (2018) Development of the adaptive, bilingual multiple sclerosis Health Resource Survey (MS-HRS). Mult Scler 24(2):738–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518798592

  15. 15.

    Ziemssen T, Kern R, Cornelissen C (2015) The PANGAEA study design—a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, long-term study on fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis in daily practice. BMC Neurol 15(93):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0342-0

  16. 16.

    Vormfelde SV, Ortler S, Ziemssen T (2016) Multiple sclerosis therapy with disease-modifying treatments in germany: the PEARL (ProspEctive phArmacoeconomic cohoRt evaluation) noninterventional study protocol. JMIR Res protoc 5(1):e23. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.4473

  17. 17.

    Graf von der Schulenburg JM, Greiner W, Jost F, Klusen N, Kubin M, Leidl R, Mittendorf T, Rebscher H, Schöffski O, Vauth C, Volmer T, Wahler S, Wasem J, Weber C (2007) Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation - dritte und aktualisierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens (German recommendations on health economic evaluation—third and updated version of the Hanover Consensus). Gesundh ökon Qual manag 12(05):285–290. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-963505

  18. 18.

    Lorscheider J, Buzzard K, Jokubaitis V, Spelman T, Havrdova E, Horakova D, Trojano M, Izquierdo G, Girard M, Duquette P, Prat A, Lugaresi A, Grand'Maison F, Grammond P, Hupperts R, Alroughani R, Sola P, Boz C, Pucci E, Lechner-Scott J, Bergamaschi R, Oreja-Guevara C, Iuliano G, Van Pesch V, Granella F, Ramo-Tello C, Spitaleri D, Petersen T, Slee M, Verheul F, Ampapa R, Amato MP, McCombe P, Vucic S, Sanchez Menoyo JL, Cristiano E, Barnett MH, Hodgkinson S, Olascoaga J, Saladino ML, Gray O, Shaw C, Moore F, Butzkueven H, Kalincik T (2016) Defining secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 139(Pt 9):2395–2405. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww173

  19. 19.

    Ernstsson O, Gyllensten H, Alexanderson K, Tinghog P, Friberg E, Norlund A (2016) Cost of illness of multiple sclerosis—a systematic review. PLoS ONE 11(7):e0159129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159129

  20. 20.

    Naci H, Fleurence R, Birt J, Duhig A (2010) Economic burden of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 28(5):363–379. https://doi.org/10.2165/11532230-000000000-00000

  21. 21.

    Koch-Henriksen N, Thygesen LC, Sørensen PS, Magyari M (2019) Worsening of disability caused by relapses in multiple sclerosis: a different approach. Mult Scler Relat Disord 32:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.04.017

  22. 22.

    Huhn K, Senger D, Utz KS, Schmidt M, Fröhlich K, Waschbisch A, Seifert F, Dörfler A, Lee D-H, Linker RA (2019) No evidence of disease activity status over 3 years in a real-world cohort of relapsing remitting MS patients in Germany. Mult Scler Relat Disord 27:133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.020

  23. 23.

    Karampampa K, Gustavsson A, Miltenburger C, Neidhardt K, Lang M (2012) Treatment experience, burden and unmet needs (TRIBUNE) in MS study: results from Germany. Mult Scler 18(2_suppl):23–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458512441566b

  24. 24.

    Gyllensten H, Kavaliunas A, Murley C, Alexanderson K, Hillert J, Tinghög P, Friberg E (2019) Costs of illness progression for different multiple sclerosis phenotypes: a population-based study in Sweden. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 5(2):2055217319858383–2055217319858383. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055217319858383

  25. 25.

    Kalincik T, Vivek V, Jokubaitis V, Lechner-Scott J, Trojano M, Izquierdo G, Lugaresi A, Grand'maison F, Hupperts R, Oreja-Guevara C, Bergamaschi R, Iuliano G, Alroughani R, Van Pesch V, Amato MP, Slee M, Verheul F, Fernandez-Bolanos R, Fiol M, Spitaleri DL, Cristiano E, Gray O, Cabrera-Gomez JA, Shaygannejad V, Herbert J, Vucic S, Needham M, Petkovska-Boskova T, Sirbu CA, Duquette P, Girard M, Grammond P, Boz C, Giuliani G, Rio ME, Barnett M, Flechter S, Moore F, Singhal B, Bacile EA, Saladino ML, Shaw C, Skromne E, Poehlau D, Vella N, Spelman T, Liew D, Kilpatrick TJ, Butzkueven H (2013) Sex as a determinant of relapse incidence and progressive course of multiple sclerosis. Brain 136(Pt 12):3609–3617. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt281

  26. 26.

    Hawton AJ, Green C (2016) Multiple sclerosis: relapses, resource use, and costs. Eur J Health Econ 17(7):875–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-015-0728-3

  27. 27.

    Brown JWL, Coles A, Horakova D, Havrdova E, Izquierdo G, Prat A, Girard M, Duquette P, Trojano M, Lugaresi A, Bergamaschi R, Grammond P, Alroughani R, Hupperts R, McCombe P, Van Pesch V, Sola P, Ferraro D, Grand'Maison F, Terzi M, Lechner-Scott J, Flechter S, Slee M, Shaygannejad V, Pucci E, Granella F, Jokubaitis V, Willis M, Rice C, Scolding N, Wilkins A, Pearson OR, Ziemssen T, Hutchinson M, Harding K, Jones J, McGuigan C, Butzkueven H, Kalincik T, Robertson N, Group ftMS (2019) Association of initial disease-modifying therapy with later conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. JAMA 321(2):175–187. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.20588

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Tjalf Ziemssen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

NHN has received funding for research from Novartis. DS has nothing to disclose. RH has received speaker fee from Sanofi and travel grants from Celgene. BE is an employee of Novartis. CC was an employee of Novartis at the time of this study, and now an employee of Siemens. TZ received personal compensation from Almirall, Biogen, Bayer, Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Teva for consulting and speaking services and he is the section editor for BMC Neurology. Additionally, he received financial support for research activities from BAT, Biogen Novartis, Teva and Sanofi.

Ethical standards

Approval for PANGAEA and PEARL were obtained from independent, local competent ethics committees.

Informed consent

All patients provided written informed consent for the collection of clinical and health economic information.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: The captions of figure 2 and figure 3 are mismatched.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ness, N., Schriefer, D., Haase, R. et al. Differentiating societal costs of disability worsening in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09676-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Progression
  • Worsening
  • Resource utilization
  • Cost of illness