Skip to main content
Log in

Chemosensory decrease in different forms of olfactory dysfunction

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of olfactory dysfunction (OD) on the two other chemical senses, namely gustation and the intranasal trigeminal system. Taste and trigeminal function were analyzed in a retrospective cross-sectional study of 178 participants with OD (n = 78 posttraumatic, n = 42 idiopathic, n = 27 post-infectious and n = 31 chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) OD). All patients had been investigated for OD at our smell and taste outpatient clinic. Evaluation of olfaction was performed by means of the Sniffin’ Sticks test (odor threshold, odor discrimination and odor identification), whereas gustatory function was assessed with the Taste Strips test and the intranasal trigeminal sensitivity by means of the lateralization task. The degree of olfactory impairment was found to depend on the cause of OD, but not on patients’ age. Patients with posttraumatic OD showed lower olfactory function than patients with idiopathic, post-infectious and CRS OD (p = 0.01). Gustatory and trigeminal sensitivity in turn depended on age rather than the cause of olfactory dysfunction. Partial correlations between olfactory, gustatory, and trigeminal scores, with age as covariate, were significant, showing a decrease of taste and trigeminal function proportional to the OD (p < 0.05). The present data suggest that the three chemical senses are closely connected for humans underlining that in case of OD the remaining chemical senses (taste, trigeminal function) tend to decrease rather than compensate as this is seen for sensory loss in other modalities. This finding has direct clinical implications and importance when dealing with smell and taste disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Betchen SA, Doty RL (1998) Bilateral detection thresholds in dextrals and sinistrals reflect the more sensitive side of the nose, which is not lateralized. Chem Sens 23:453–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cain WS (1974) Contribution of the trigeminal nerve to perceived odor magnitude. Ann N Y Acad Sci 237:28–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cain WS, Murphy CL (1980) Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation. Nature 284:255–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cecchini MP, Cardobi N, Sbarbati A, Monaco S, Tinazzi M, Tamburin S (2018) Post-traumatic taste disorders: a case series. J Neurol 265:836–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cecchini MP, Fasano A, Boschi F, Osculati F, Tinazzi M (2015) Taste in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol 262:806–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Daiber P, Genovese F, Schriever VA, Hummel T, Mohrlen F, Frings S (2013) Neuropeptide receptors provide a signalling pathway for trigeminal modulation of olfactory transduction. Eur J Neurosci 37:572–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dalton P, Doolittle N, Nagata H, Breslin PA (2000) The merging of the senses: integration of subthreshold taste and smell. Nat Neurosci 3:431–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. de Guise E, Gosselin N, Leblanc J, Champoux MC, Couturier C, Lamoureux J, Dagher J, Marcoux J, Maleki M, Feyz M (2011) Clock drawing and mini-mental state examination in patients with traumatic brain injury. Appl Neuropsychol 18:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deems DA, Doty RL, Settle RG, Moore-Gillon V, Shaman P, Mester AF, Kimmelman CP, Brightman VJ, Snow JB Jr (1991) Smell and taste disorders, a study of 750 patients from the University of Pennsylvania Smell and Taste Center. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:519–528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frasnelli J, Livermore A, Soiffer A, Hummel T (2002) Comparison of lateralized and binasal olfactory thresholds. Rhinology 40:129–134

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Frasnelli J, Schuster B, Hummel T (2007) Subjects with congenital anosmia have larger peripheral but similar central trigeminal responses. Cereb Cortex 17:370–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gudziol H, Schubert M, Hummel T (2001) Decreased trigeminal sensitivity in anosmia. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 63:72–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hummel T, Barz S, Lotsch J, Roscher S, Kettenmann B, Kobal G (1996) Loss of olfactory function leads to a decrease of trigeminal sensitivity. Chem Sens 21:75–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hummel T, Futschik T, Frasnelli J, Huttenbrink KB (2003) Effects of olfactory function, age, and gender on trigeminally mediated sensations: a study based on the lateralization of chemosensory stimuli. Toxicol Lett 140–141:273–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hummel T, Landis BN, Huttenbrink KB (2011) Smell and taste disorders. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 10:Doc04

  16. Hummel T, Whitcroft KL, Andrews P, Altundag A, Cinghi C, Costanzo RM, Damm M, Frasnelli J, Gudziol H, Gupta N, Haehner A, Holbrook E, Hong SC, Hornung D, Huttenbrink KB, Kamel R, Kobayashi M, Konstantinidis I, Landis BN, Leopold DA, Macchi A, Miwa T, Moesges R, Mullol J, Mueller CA, Ottaviano G, Passali GC, Philpott C, Pinto JM, Ramakrishnan VJ, Rombaux P, Roth Y, Schlosser RA, Shu B, Soler G, Stjarne P, Stuck BA, Vodicka J, Welge-Luessen A (2017) Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. Rhinology 54:1–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kobal G, Hummel C (1988) Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosa. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 71:241–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Konstantinidis I, Tsakiropoulou E, Chatziavramidis A, Ikonomidis C, Markou K (2017) Intranasal trigeminal function in patients with empty nose syndrome. Laryngoscope 127:1263–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Landis BN, Hummel T, Hugentobler M, Giger R, Lacroix JS (2003) Ratings of overall olfactory function. Chem Sens 28:691–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Landis BN, Konnerth CG, Hummel T (2004) A Study on the Frequency of Olfactory Dysfunction. Laryngoscope 114:1764–1769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Landis BN, Scheibe M, Weber C, Berger R, Bramerson A, Bende M, Nordin S, Hummel T (2010) Chemosensory interaction: acquired olfactory impairment is associated with decreased taste function. J Neurol 257:1303–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Landis BN, Stow NW, Lacroix JS, Hugentobler M, Hummel T (2009) Olfactory disorders: the patients' view. Rhinology 47:454–459

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Bramerson A, Bende M, Mueller CA, Nordin S, Hummel T (2009) "Taste Strips"—a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol 256:242–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Laska M, Distel H, Hudson R (1997) Trigeminal perception of odorant quality in congenitally anosmic subjects. Chem Sens 22:447–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lundstrom JN, Gordon AR, Wise P, Frasnelli J (2012) Individual differences in the chemical senses: is there a common sensitivity? Chem Sens 37:371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oleszkiewicz A, Schriever VA, Croy I, Hahner A, Hummel T (2019) Updated Sniffin' Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:719–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pence TS, Reiter ER, DiNardo LJ, Costanzo RM (2014) Risk factors for hazardous events in olfactory-impaired patients. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:951–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rolls ET (2005) Taste, olfactory, and food texture processing in the brain, and the control of food intake. Physiol Behav 85:45–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schaefer ML, Bottger B, Silver WL, Finger TE (2002) Trigeminal collaterals in the nasal epithelium and olfactory bulb: a potential route for direct modulation of olfactory information by trigeminal stimuli. J Comp Neurol 444:221–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schriever VA, Hummel T (2015) Subjective changes in nasal patency after chewing a menthol-containing gum in patients with olfactory loss. Acta Otolaryngol 135:254–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Simon HJ, Levitt H (2007) Effect of dual sensory loss on auditory localization: implications for intervention. Trends Amplif 11:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stinton N, Atif MA, Barkat N, Doty RL (2010) Influence of smell loss on taste function. Behav Neurosci 124:256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tremblay C, Durand Martel P, Frasnelli J (2018) Chemosensory perception is specifically impaired in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 57:68–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Mitacs Globalink scholarship (CMB, IT13349), the Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Santé (JF), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (JF), and the Chaire de Recherche UQTR en Neuroanatomie Chimiosensorielle (JF). BNL was supported by a grant of the Foundation AURIS (https://fondationauris.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basile Nicolas Landis.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Migneault-Bouchard, C., Hsieh, J.W., Hugentobler, M. et al. Chemosensory decrease in different forms of olfactory dysfunction. J Neurol 267, 138–143 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09564-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09564-x

Keywords

Navigation