Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Selective suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex during human locomotion

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In lower vertebrates, gaze stabilization during locomotion is at least partially driven by a direct coupling of spinal locomotor commands with extraocular motor signals. To what extent locomotor feed-forward mechanisms contribute to gaze stabilization during human locomotion is yet unknown. In principle, the feasibility of a feed-forward regulation of gaze during locomotion should critically depend on the spatiotemporal coupling between body and head kinematics and hence the internal predictability of head movements (HMP). The present study thus investigated whether changes in eye–head coordination during human locomotion can be explained by concurrent changes in HMP.

Methods

Eye and head movements were recorded at different locomotor speeds in light and darkness to obtain the gain and phase of the horizontal and vertical angular VOR (aVOR). Potential correlations between aVOR performance and HMP were analyzed in dependence of locomotor speed and gait cycle phase.

Results

Horizontal aVOR responses persisted independent of locomotor speed. In contrast, with increasing locomotor speed vertical eye–head coordination switched from a VOR-driven compensatory mode to a synergistic behavior where head and eyes move in phase. Concurrently, vertical HMP increased with faster locomotion. Furthermore, modulations in vertical aVOR gain across the gait cycle corresponded to simultaneous alterations in vertical HMP.

Conclusion

The vertical aVOR appears to be suppressed during faster walking and running, whereas at the same time, the predictability of resultant head movements increases. This suggests that during stereotyped human locomotion, internal feed-forward commands supplement or even suppress sensory feedback to mediate gaze stabilization in the vertical plane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angelaki DE, Cullen KE (2008) Vestibular system: the many facets of a multimodal sense. Annu Rev Neurosci 31:125–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lambert FM, Combes D, Simmers J, Straka H (2012) Gaze stabilization by efference copy signaling without sensory feedback during vertebrate locomotion. Curr Biol 22:1649–1658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Straka H, Simmers J, Chagnaud BP (2018) A new perspective on predictive motor signaling. Curr Biol 28:R232–R243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roy JE, Cullen KE (2004) Dissociating self-generated from passively applied head motion: neural mechanisms in the vestibular nuclei. J Neurosci 24:2102–2111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brandt T, Strupp M, Benson J (1999) You are better off running than walking with acute vestibulopathy. Lancet 354:746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jahn K, Strupp M, Brandt T (2002) Both actual and imagined locomotion suppress spontaneous vestibular nystagmus. NeuroReport 13:2125–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anson ER, Kiemel T, Carey JP, Jeka JJ (2017) Eye movements are correctly timed during walking despite bilateral vestibular hypofunction. JARO 18:591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MacNeilage PR, Glasauer S (2017) Quantification of head movement predictability and implications for suppression of vestibular input during locomotion. Front Comput Neurosci 11:47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chagnaud BP, Simmers J, Straka H (2012) Predictability of visual perturbation during locomotion: implications for corrective efference copy signaling. Biol Cybern 106:669–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dietrich H, Wuehr M (2019) Strategies for gaze stabilization critically depend on locomotor speed. Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.01.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McGibbon CA, Palmer T, Goldvasser D, Krebs DE (2001) Kalman filter detection of blinks in video-oculography: applications for VVOR measurement during locomotion. J Neurosci Methods 106:171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paige GD, Telford L, Seidman SH, Barnes GR (1998) Human vestibuloocular reflex and its interactions with vision and fixation distance during linear and angular head movement. J Neurophysiol 80:2391–2404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415:429–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fechner GT (1860) Elemente der Psychophysik. Breitkopf und Härtel

  15. Tabak S, Collewijn H (1994) Human vestibulo-ocular responses to rapid, helmet-driven head movements. Exp Brain Res 102:367–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McGarvie LA, MacDougall HG, Halmagyi GM, Burgess AM, Weber KP, Curthoys IS (2015) The video head impulse test (vHIT) of semicircular canal function—age-dependent normative values of VOR gain in healthy subjects. Front Neurol 6:154

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dakin CJ, Inglis JT, Chua R, Blouin JS (2013) Muscle-specific modulation of vestibular reflexes with increased locomotor velocity and cadence. J Neurophysiol 110:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jahn K, Deutschländer A, Stephan T, Kalla R, Hüfner K, Wagner J, Strupp M, Brandt T (2008) Supraspinal locomotor control in quadrupeds and humans. Prog Brain Res 171:353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Takakusaki K (2017) Functional neuroanatomy for posture and gait control. J Mov Disord 10:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wuehr M, Schniepp R, Pradhan C, Ilmberger J, Strupp M, Brandt T, Jahn K (2013) Differential effects of absent visual feedback control on gait variability during different locomotion speeds. Exp Brain Res 224:287–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wuehr M, Schniepp R, Schlick C, Huth S, Pradhan C, Dieterich M, Brandt T, Jahn K (2014) Sensory loss and walking speed related factors for gait alterations in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Gait Posture 39:852–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding

The work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Science (BMBF, IFB 01EO1401).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haike Dietrich.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the University of Munich. All procedures were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and participants gave their written informed consent.

Additional information

This manuscript is part of a supplement sponsored by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the funding initiative for integrated research and treatment centers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dietrich, H., Wuehr, M. Selective suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex during human locomotion. J Neurol 266 (Suppl 1), 101–107 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09352-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09352-7

Keywords

Navigation