Advertisement

Journal of Neurology

, Volume 265, Issue 11, pp 2684–2687 | Cite as

2017 revisions of McDonald criteria shorten the time to diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in clinically isolated syndromes

  • Lorenzo Gaetani
  • Luca Prosperini
  • Andrea Mancini
  • Paolo Eusebi
  • Maria Chiara Cerri
  • Carlo Pozzilli
  • Paolo Calabresi
  • Paola Sarchielli
  • Massimiliano Di Filippo
Original Communication

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the impact of the 2017 revisions of McDonald criteria on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) in a cohort of patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and dissemination in space (DIS) of demyelinating lesions.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 137 patients with CIS + DIS from two Italian MS centers.

Results

Application of the 2017 revisions of McDonald criteria in our cohort led to a diagnosis of MS in 82.5% of the patients who could have not been diagnosed with MS according to the previous criteria at the time of the first demyelinating event. After a follow-up of 3.8 ± 2.9 years, 85.8% of these patients eventually satisfied also the previous (2010) criteria.

Conclusions

Application of the 2017 revisions of McDonald criteria results in an earlier diagnosis of MS in a large percentage of CIS patients destined to convert to MS.

Keywords

Clinically isolated syndrome Multiple sclerosis Conversion Diagnostic criteria Dissemination in space Dissemination in time Symptomatic gadolinium enhancing lesion Oligoclonal bands 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

LG received travel grants from Biogen, Novartis, Teva, Sanofi Genzyme and Almirall to attend national and international conferences. LP has received research grant from Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (AISM) and Genzyme; consulting and/or lecture fees and travel grants from Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis and Teva. AM received travel grants from Teva and Sanofi Genzyme to attend national conferences. CP has received consulting and/or lecture fees and/or research funding and travel grant from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche and Teva. PC received/receive research support from Bayer Schering, Biogen-Dompé, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Lundbeck, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Sigma-Tau, and UCB Pharma. MDF participated to advisory boards and received speaker/writing honoraria and funding for traveling from: Bayer, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. PE, PS, MCC report no conflicts of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F et al (2018) Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 17:162–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rovira A, Swanton J, Tintoré M et al (2009) A single, early magnetic resonance imaging study in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 66:587–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Filippi M, Rocca MA, Ciccarelli O et al (2016) MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines. Lancet Neurol 15:292–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brownlee WJ, Swanton JK, Miszkiel KA et al (2016) Should the symptomatic region be included in dissemination in space in MRI criteria for MS? Neurology 87(7):680–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaetani L, Fanelli F, Riccucci I et al (2017) High risk of early conversion to multiple sclerosis in clinically isolated syndromes with dissemination in space at baseline. J Neurol Sci 379:236–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Filippi M, Rocca MA, Bastianello S et al (2013) Guidelines from the Italian Neurological and Neuroradiological Societies for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in daily life clinical practice of multiple sclerosis patients. Neurol Sci 34:2085–2093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Link H, Huang YM (2006) Oligoclonal bands in multiple sclerosis cerebrospinal fluid: an update on methodology and clinical usefulness. J Neuroimmunol 180:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McNicholas N, Lockhart A, Yap SM et al (2018) New versus old: implications of evolving diagnostic criteria for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 21:1352458518770088Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beesley R, Anderson V, Harding KE et al (2018) Impact of the 2017 revisions to McDonald criteria on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 1:1352458518778007Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Filippi M, Preziosa P, Meani A et al (2017) Prediction of a multiple sclerosis diagnosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome using the 2016 MAGNIMS and 2010 McDonald criteria: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 4422:1–10Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuhle J, Disanto G, Dobson R et al (2015) Conversion from clinically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis: a large multicentre study. Mult Scler 21:1013–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swanton JK, Rovira A, Tintore M et al (2007) MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 6(8):677–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Metz LM, Eliasziw M (2017) Trial of minocycline in clinically isolated syndrome of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 377(8):789CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Gaetani
    • 1
  • Luca Prosperini
    • 2
    • 3
  • Andrea Mancini
    • 1
  • Paolo Eusebi
    • 1
  • Maria Chiara Cerri
    • 1
  • Carlo Pozzilli
    • 2
  • Paolo Calabresi
    • 1
    • 4
  • Paola Sarchielli
    • 1
  • Massimiliano Di Filippo
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinica Neurologica, Dipartimento di Medicina, Ospedale S. Maria della MisericordiaUniversità degli Studi di PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Neurology and PsychiatrySapienza UniversityRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of NeurosciencesS. Camillo-Forlanini HospitalRomeItaly
  4. 4.IRCCS Fondazione Santa LuciaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations