Sex ratio in multiple sclerosis mortality over 65 years; an age-period-cohort analysis in Norway
Increasing female: male ratio in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been assigned to cohort effects, with females in more recent birth cohorts possibly being more exposed or vulnerable to environmental risk factors than males. We collected MS mortality data in Norway from 1951 to 2015 from The Norwegian Cause of Death registry. Age-Period-Cohort analysis was conducted using log-linear Poisson models, including sex interaction terms. MS was registered as the underlying, contributing or direct cause in 6060 deaths. MS associated mortality remained stable with a slight preponderance among males until after 1980, and have since increased preferentially among females. Throughout the study period the mean annual increase was 1.25% for females and 0.3% for males (p < 0.0001). Age-period-cohort analysis revealed limited evidence of cohort effects for the gender differences; the best fitting model only included gender-age and gender-period interaction terms. The period effect evened out for males in the last three decades but increased for females, especially among the oldest age-groups. In conclusion, the increased female: male mortality ratio in MS associated mortality is driven mainly by increased mortality among females in the three last decades, particularly in the older age groups. It is best explained by disproportional period effects, providing evidence of time-varying external factors including improved access to diagnosis among females.
KeywordsMultiple sclerosis Sex ratio Neuro-epidemiology Mortality Age-period-cohort model
We are grateful for data supplied by the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
The study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC South East).
Research involving human and animal participants
The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or individual patient data.
- 2.Alonso A, Hernan MA (2008) Temporal trends in the incidence of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Neurology 71(2):129–135. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000316802.35974.34 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.Holford TR (1991) Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates. Annu Rev Public Health 12:425–457. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.002233 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Oftedal SI (1966) Multiple sclerosis in Vestfold, Norway. Acta Neurol Scand 42(Suppl 19):19–26Google Scholar
- 27.Statistics Norway (1994) Historical statistics. http://www.ssb.no/a/histstat/tabeller/kap09.html. Accessed Dec 1st 2017
- 30.Kampman MT, Aarseth JH, Grytten N, Benjaminsen E, Celius EG, Dahl OP, Holmoy T, Loken-Amsrud K, Midgard R, Myhr KM, Risberg G, Vatne A, Torkildsen O (2013) Sex ratio of multiple sclerosis in persons born from 1930 to 1979 and its relation to latitude in Norway. J Neurol 260(6):1481–1488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6814-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Trojano M, Lucchese G, Graziano G, Taylor BV, Simpson S Jr, Lepore V, Grand’maison F, Duquette P, Izquierdo G, Grammond P, Amato MP, Bergamaschi R, Giuliani G, Boz C, Hupperts R, Van Pesch V, Lechner-Scott J, Cristiano E, Fiol M, Oreja-Guevara C, Saladino ML, Verheul F, Slee M, Paolicelli D, Tortorella C, D’Onghia M, Iaffaldano P, Direnzo V, Butzkueven H (2012) Geographical variations in sex ratio trends over time in multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE 7(10):e48078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048078 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar