Journal of Neurology

, Volume 265, Issue 4, pp 917–925 | Cite as

Treatment of neuromyelitis optica with rituximab: a 2-year prospective multicenter study

  • Philippe CabreEmail author
  • M. Mejdoubi
  • S. Jeannin
  • H. Merle
  • Y. Plumelle
  • G. Cavillon
  • D. Smadja
  • R. Marignier
  • On behalf of Francophone Society of Multiple Sclerosis and OFSEP investigators
Original Communication



Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a very severe autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system. It affects young subjects and has a poor prognosis both on a functional and vital level. Therefore, it is imperative to reduce the frequency of relapses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and neuroradiological effectiveness of rituximab (RTX) on active forms of NMO.


We conducted a 2-year open prospective multicenter study that included 32 patients treated with RTX at a dose of 375 mg/m2/week for 1 month. When the number of circulating CD19+ B cells reached 1%, a maintenance therapy was started, consisting of two infusions of 1 g of RTX, administered at a 15-day interval. The primary objective was to reduce the annual relapse rate (ARR), in comparison to that observed in the 2 years before treatment onset.


Rituximab administration reduced the ARR from 1.34 to 0.56 (p = 0.0005). The average Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score significantly improved by 1.1 point, from 5.9 (2–9) to 4.8 (0–9) after 2 years (p = 0.03). Anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies’ level predicted treatment failure (p = 0.03). Frequency of Gad+ lesions in spinal cord decreased from 23.3 to 14.2%. RTX treatment did not prevent the death of three patients (treatment failure in two patients and acute myeloid leukemia in a patient previously treated with mitoxantrone).


Rituximab is clinically effective in active forms of NMO, although few patients are resistant to the treatment.


Neuromyelitis optica Rituximab Treatment Magnetic resonance imaging 



The authors acknowledge D. Laplaud MD, PhD from CHRU Nantes (France), R. Deschamps MD and O. Gout MD from Rothschild Foundation (France), and J. de Seze MD, PhD, from CHRU Strasbourg (France) for participating in the study. This work has been done using data from The Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP) which is supported by a grant provided by the French State and handled by the “Agence Nationale de la Recherche”, within the framework of the “Investments for the Future” programme under the reference ANR-10-COHO-002 Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP), and by the Eugene Devic Foundation against Multiple Sclerosis (EDMUS Foundation).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

I (Philippe Cabre) assume that none of the authors had a conflict of interest with the content of the present study.

Ethical standard

The ethics committee of Fort de France approved this study. All samples were stored at −80 °C at CERBIM (CHU Martinique) that has been labelled by French Ministry of Health.


  1. 1.
    Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O’Brien PC, Weinshenker BG (1999) The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome). Neurology 53:1107–1114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Verkman AS, Hinson SR (2005) IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med 202:433–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matiello M, Lennon VA, Jacob A et al (2008) NMO-IgG predicts the outcome of recurrent optic neuritis. Neurology 70:2197–2200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weinshenker BG, Wingerchuk DM, Vukusic S et al (2006) Neuromyelitis optica IgG predicts relapse after longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Ann Neurol 59:566–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jarius S, Aboul-Enein F, Waters P et al (2008) Antibody to aquaporin-4 in the long term course of neuromyelitis optica. Brain 131:3072–3080CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weinstock-Guttman B, Miller C, Yeh EA et al (2008) Neuromyelitis optica immunoglobulins as a marker of disease activity and response to therapy in patients with neuromyelitis optica. Mult Scler 14:1061–1067CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kinoshita M, Nakatsuji Y, Kimura T et al (2009) Neuromyelitis optica: passive transfer to rats by human immunoglobulin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 386:623–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bradl M, Misu T, Takahashi T et al (2009) Neuromyelitis optica: pathogenicity of patient immunoglobulin in vivo. Ann Neurol 66:630–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bennett JL, Lam C, Kalluri SR et al (2009) Intrathecal pathogenic anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies in early neuromyelitis optica. Ann Neurol 66:617–629CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saadoun S, Waters P, Bell BA, Vincent A, Verkman AS, Papadopoulos MC (2010) Intra-cerebral injection of neuromyelitis optica immunoglobulin G and human complement produces neuromyelitis optica lesions in mice. Brain 133:349–361CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Browning JL (2006) B cells move to centre stage: novel opportunities for autoimmune disease treatment. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:564–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edwards JC, Cambridge G (2005) Prospects for B-cell-targeted therapy in autoimmune disease. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoyer BF, Manz RA, Radbruch A, Hiepe F (2005) Long-lived plasma cells and their contribution to autoimmunity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1050:124–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cree BA, Lamb S, Morgan K, Chen A, Waubant E, Genain C (2005) An open label study of the effects of rituximab in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 64:1270–1272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jacob A, Weinshenker BG, Violich I et al (2008) Treatment of neuromyelitis optica with rituximab: retrospective analysis of 25 patients. Arch Neurol 65:1443–1448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Collongues N, Brassat D, Maillart E et al (2016) Efficacy of Rituximab in refractory in neuromyelitis optica. Mult Scler 22:955–959CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pellkofer HL, Krumbholz M, Berthele A et al (2011) Long-term follow-up of patients with neuromyelitis optica after repeated therapy with rituximab. Neurology 76:1310–1315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim SH, Kim W, Li XF, Jung IJ, Kim HJ (2011) Repeated treatment with rituximab based on the assessment of peripheral circulating memory B cells in patients with relapsing neuromyelitis optica over 2 years. Arch Neurol 68:1412–1420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Damato V, Evoli A, Ioro R (2016) Efficacy and safety of rituximab therapy in Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. JAMA Neurol 73:1342–1348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennet JL et al (2015) International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology 85:177–189CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchinetti SF, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG (2006) Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 66:1485–1489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cohen M, Romero G, Bas J et al (2017) Monitoring CD27+ B cells in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders patients treated with rituximab. Results from a bicentric study. J Neurol Sci 373:335–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dai Y, Lu T, Wang Y et al (2016) Rapid exacerbation of neuromyelitis optica after rituximab treatment. J Clin Neurosci 26:168–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nakashima I, Takahashi T, Cree BA et al (2011) Transient increases in anti-aquaporin-4 antibody titers following rituximab treatment in neuromyelitis optica, in association with elevated serum BAFF levels. J Clin Neurosci 18:997–998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Avery DT, Kalled SL, Ellyard JI et al (2003) BAFF selectively enhances the survival of plasmablasts generated from human memory B cells. J Clin Invest 112:286–297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim SH, Jeong IH, Yhun JH et al (2015) Treatment outcomes with rituximab in 100 patients with neuromyelitis optica. Influence of FCGR3A polymorphisms on the therapeutic response to rituximab. JAMA Neurol 72:989–995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berger JR, Houff SA, Major EO (2009) Monoclonal antibodies and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. mAbs 6:583–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bichuetti DB, Lobato de Oliveira EM, Oliveira DM, Amorin de Souza N, Gabbai AA (2010) Neuromyelitis optica treatment: analysis of 36 patients. Arch Neurol 67:1131–1136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jacob A, Matiello M, Weinshenker BG et al (2009) Treatment of neuromyelitis optica with mycophenolate mofetil: retrospective analysis of 24 patients. Arch Neurol 66:1128–1133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Cabre
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Mejdoubi
    • 2
  • S. Jeannin
    • 1
  • H. Merle
    • 3
  • Y. Plumelle
    • 4
  • G. Cavillon
    • 5
  • D. Smadja
    • 1
  • R. Marignier
    • 5
  • On behalf of Francophone Society of Multiple Sclerosis and OFSEP investigators
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyPierre Zobda-Quitman University HospitalFort de FranceMartinique
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyPierre Zobda-Quitman University HospitalFort de FranceMartinique
  3. 3.Department of OphthalmologyPierre Zobda-Quitman University HospitalFort de FranceMartinique
  4. 4.Department of Biological HematologyPierre Zobda-Quitman University HospitalFort de FranceMartinique
  5. 5.Department of NeurologyPierre-Wertheimer Hospital, Civilian Hospices of LyonLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations