Advertisement

Journal of Neurology

, Volume 265, Issue 3, pp 578–585 | Cite as

Patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy in cases with cryptogenic stroke, meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Elsayed Abo-salem
  • Bernard Chaitman
  • Tarek Helmy
  • Eric Adjei Boakye
  • Hassan Alkhawam
  • Michael Lim
Original Communication

Abstract

Background

PFO is more common in cases with cryptogenic stroke compared to cases with no stroke or stroke of identified etiology. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PFO closure with medical therapy have been published with controversial findings.

Methods

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were searched for RCT comparing PFO closure with medical therapy including antiplatelet therapy (aspirin or clopidogrel or combination) or anticoagulation. We identified 5 trials, including 3627 cases. The mean duration of follow-up was 4 years. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed and random-effects models.

Results

There was a significant reduction in the incidence of stroke among the PFO closure group compared to medical therapy group, 2.0 versus 4.2%, RR 0.48; 95% CI (0.3, 0.7), p < 0.001. The incidence of AF was higher in the PFO closure group compared to medical therapy group, 4.2 versus 0.7%, respectively, RR 5.9, 95% CI (3, 11), p < 0.001. After exclusion of oral anticoagulants cases (19%), analysis showed a lower incidence of stroke in the PFO closure group (2%) compared to antiplatelet therapy (5.2%), RR 0.4; 95% CI (0.3, 0.6), p < 0.001. There was no significant difference between both groups in the incidence of transient ischemic attacks or all-cause deaths.

Conclusion

PFO closure results in a significant reduction in the recurrence of ischemic stroke compared to medical therapy alone, primarily antiplatelet, among cases with PFO and cryptogenic stroke.

Keywords

Patent foramen ovale Stroke Cryptogenic stroke Antiplatelet therapy Anticoagulation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no confict of interest.

Ethical standards

This manuscript does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jimenez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Mackey RH, Matsushita K, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Thiagarajan RR, Reeves MJ, Ritchey M, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sasson C, Towfighi A, Tsao CW, Turner MB, Virani SS, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, Muntner P, American Heart Association Statistics C, Stroke Statistics S (2017) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 135:e146–e603CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saver JL (2016) Clinical practice. Cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 374:2065–2074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Handke M, Harloff A, Olschewski M, Hetzel A, Geibel A (2007) Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke in older patients. N Engl J Med 357:2262–2268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Srivastava TN, Payment MF (1997) Images in clinical medicine. Paradoxical embolism–thrombus in transit through a patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med 337:681CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI, Ezekowitz MD, Fang MC, Fisher M, Furie KL, Heck DV, Johnston SC, Kasner SE, Kittner SJ, Mitchell PH, Rich MW, Richardson D, Schwamm LH, Wilson JA, American Heart Association Stroke Council CoC, Stroke Nursing CoCC, Council on Peripheral Vascular D (2014) Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 45:2160–2236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Messe SR, Gronseth G, Kent DM, Kizer JR, Homma S, Rosterman L, Kasner SE (2016) Practice advisory: recurrent stroke with patent foramen ovale (update of practice parameter): Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 87:815–821CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sondergaard L, Kasner SE, Rhodes JF, Andersen G, Iversen HK, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Settergren M, Sjostrand C, Roine RO, Hildick-Smith D, Spence JD, Thomassen L, Gore RCSI (2017) Patent foramen ovale closure or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 377:1033–1042CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saver JL, Carroll JD, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, MacDonald LA, Marks DS, Tirschwell DL, Investigators R (2017) Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke. N Engl J Med 377:1022–1032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B, Massardier E, Hosseini H, Mechtouff L, Arquizan C, Bejot Y, Vuillier F, Detante O, Guidoux C, Canaple S, Vaduva C, Dequatre-Ponchelle N, Sibon I, Garnier P, Ferrier A, Timsit S, Robinet-Borgomano E, Sablot D, Lacour JC, Zuber M, Favrole P, Pinel JF, Apoil M, Reiner P, Lefebvre C, Guerin P, Piot C, Rossi R, Dubois-Rande JL, Eicher JC, Meneveau N, Lusson JR, Bertrand B, Schleich JM, Godart F, Thambo JB, Leborgne L, Michel P, Pierard L, Turc G, Barthelet M, Charles-Nelson A, Weimar C, Moulin T, Juliard JM, Chatellier G, Investigators C (2017) Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation vs. antiplatelets after stroke. N Engl J Med 377:1011–1021CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP, Khattab AA, Hildick-Smith D, Dudek D, Andersen G, Ibrahim R, Schuler G, Walton AS, Wahl A, Windecker S, Juni P, Investigators PCT (2013) Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med 368:1083–1091CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, Mauri L, Adams H, Albers GW, Felberg R, Herrmann H, Kar S, Landzberg M, Raizner A, Wechsler L, Investigators CI (2012) Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med 366:991–999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanna T, Diener HC, Passman RS, Di Lazzaro V, Bernstein RA, Morillo CA, Rymer MM, Thijs V, Rogers T, Beckers F, Lindborg K, Brachmann J, Investigators CA (2014) Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 370:2478–2486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alsheikh-Ali AA, Thaler DE, Kent DM (2009) Patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke: incidental or pathogenic? Stroke 40:2349–2355CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stortecky S, da Costa BR, Mattle HP, Carroll J, Hornung M, Sievert H, Trelle S, Windecker S, Meier B, Juni P (2015) Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic embolism: a network meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 36:120–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krumsdorf U, Ostermayer S, Billinger K, Trepels T, Zadan E, Horvath K, Sievert H (2004) Incidence and clinical course of thrombus formation on atrial septal defect and patient foramen ovale closure devices in 1000 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:302–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, Berry S, MacDonald LA, Marks DS, Tirschwell DL, Investigators R (2013) Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 368:1092–1100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Peerless SJ, Ferguson GG, Fox AJ, Rankin RN, Hachinski VC, Wiebers DO, Eliasziw M, North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial C (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445–453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh V, Badheka AO, Patel NJ, Chothani A, Mehta K, Arora S, Patel N, Deshmukh A, Shah N, Savani GT, Rathod A, Manvar S, Thakkar B, Panchal V, Patel J, Palacios IF, Rihal CS, Cohen MG, O’Neill W, De Marchena E (2015) Influence of hospital volume on outcomes of percutaneous atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale closure: a 10-years US perspective. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 85:1073–1081CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spies C, Khandelwal A, Timmermanns I, Schrader R (2008) Incidence of atrial fibrillation following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in adults. Am J Cardiol 102:902–906CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Staubach S, Steinberg DH, Zimmermann W, Wawra N, Wilson N, Wunderlich N, Sievert H (2009) New onset atrial fibrillation after patent foramen ovale closure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 74:889–895CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chessa M, Carminati M, Butera G, Bini RM, Drago M, Rosti L, Giamberti A, Pome G, Bossone E, Frigiola A (2009) Early and late complications associated with transcatheter occlusion of secundum atrial septal defect. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1061–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nedeltchev K, Wiedmer S, Schwerzmann M, Windecker S, Haefeli T, Meier B, Mattle HP, Arnold M (2008) Sex differences in cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. Am Heart J 156:461–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kent DM, Thaler DE (2010) Is patent foramen ovale a modifiable risk factor for stroke recurrence? Stroke 41:S26–S30CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elsayed Abo-salem
    • 1
  • Bernard Chaitman
    • 1
  • Tarek Helmy
    • 1
  • Eric Adjei Boakye
    • 2
  • Hassan Alkhawam
    • 1
  • Michael Lim
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Comprehensive Cardiovascular Care, Saint Louis University School of MedicineSt Louis University HospitalSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Saint Louis University Center for Health Outcomes ResearchSaint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations