Safety profile of intracranial electrode implantation for video-EEG recordings in drug-resistant focal epilepsy
- 378 Downloads
Invasive electroencephalography recordings with depth or subdural electrodes are necessary to identify the ictogenic area in some drug-resistant focal epilepsies. We aimed to analyze the safety profile of intracranial electrode implantation in a tertiary center and the factors associated with its complications. We retrospectively examined complications in 163 intracranial procedures performed in adult patients. Implantation methods included oblique depth stereotactic approach (n = 128) and medial–temporal depth stereotactic approach in combination with subdural strip placement (n = 35). 1201 depth macroelectrodes, 59 bundles of microelectrodes (in 30 patients) and 148 subdural electrodes were implanted. Complications were classified as major (requiring treatment or leading to neurological impairment) or minor. The rate of overall complications was 4.9 % (n = 8), with 3.1 % (n = 5) of major complications, though no permanent morbidity or mortality was recorded. Infection occurred in 1.2 % and hemorrhage in 3.7 % of patients. One hemorrhage occurred for every 225 electrodes implanted (4.4 ‰). Microelectrodes were not responsible for any complications. Overall and hemorrhagic complications were significantly associated with MRI-negative cases (7.3 and 6.3 % versus 0 %, p = 0.04). We believe that intracranial electrode implantation has a favorable safety profile, without permanent deficit. These risks should be balanced with the benefits of invasive exploration prior to surgery. Furthermore, this study provides preliminary evidence regarding the safety of micro-macroelectrodes.
KeywordsSEEG (Stereoelectroencephalography) Invasive EEG Depth electrodes Complications Adverse events Epilepsy surgery
This work received support from the program “Investissements d’avenir” ANR-10-IAIHU-06. The authors thank Prof. Pierre Levy and Dr. Alister Rogers for advice and discussion concerning the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 1.Engel J Jr, Henry TR, Risinger MW, Mazziotta JC, Sutherling WW, Levesque MF, Phelps ME (1990) Presurgical evaluation for partial epilepsy: relative contributions of chronic depth-electrode recordings versus FDG-PET and scalp-sphenoidal ictal EEG. Neurology 40(11):1670–1677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Enatsu R, Bulacio J, Najm I, Wyllie E, So NK, Nair DR, Foldvary-Schaefer N, Bingaman W, Gonzalez-Martinez J (2014) Combining stereo-electroencephalography and subdural electrodes in the diagnosis and treatment of medically intractable epilepsy. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australasia 21(8):1441–1445. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.12.014 Google Scholar
- 9.Munari C (1987) Depth electrode implantation at Hôpital Sainte Anne, Paris. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. Raven Press Ltd, New York, pp 583–588Google Scholar
- 11.Guenot M, Isnard J, Ryvlin P, Fischer C, Ostrowsky K, Mauguiere F, Sindou M (2001) Neurophysiological monitoring for epilepsy surgery: the Talairach SEEG method. StereoElectroEncephaloGraphy. Indications, results, complications and therapeutic applications in a series of 100 consecutive cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 77(1–4):29–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Cardinale F, Cossu M, Castana L, Casaceli G, Schiariti MP, Miserocchi A, Fuschillo D, Moscato A, Caborni C, Arnulfo G, Lo Russo G (2013) Stereoelectroencephalography: surgical methodology, safety, and stereotactic application accuracy in 500 procedures. Neurosurgery 72(3):353–366. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827d1161 (discussion 366) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Van Gompel JJ, Worrell GA, Bell ML, Patrick TA, Cascino GD, Raffel C, Marsh WR, Meyer FB (2008) Intracranial electroencephalography with subdural grid electrodes: techniques, complications, and outcomes. Neurosurgery 63(3):498–505. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000324996.37228.F8 (discussion 505–496) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Wong CH, Birkett J, Byth K, Dexter M, Somerville E, Gill D, Chaseling R, Fearnside M, Bleasel A (2009) Risk factors for complications during intracranial electrode recording in presurgical evaluation of drug resistant partial epilepsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151(1):37–50. doi: 10.1007/s00701-008-0171-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Placantonakis DG, Shariff S, Lafaille F, Labar D, Harden C, Hosain S, Kandula P, Schaul N, Kolesnik D, Schwartz TH (2010) Bilateral intracranial electrodes for lateralizing intractable epilepsy: efficacy, risk, and outcome. Neurosurgery 66(2):274–283. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000363184.43723.94 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Hedegard E, Bjellvi J, Edelvik A, Rydenhag B, Flink R, Malmgren K (2014) Complications to invasive epilepsy surgery workup with subdural and depth electrodes: a prospective population-based observational study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 85(7):716–720. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306465 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar