Advertisement

Journal of Neurology

, Volume 261, Issue 2, pp 291–299 | Cite as

White matter damage is related to ataxia severity in SCA3

  • J.-S. Kang
  • J. C. Klein
  • S. Baudrexel
  • R. Deichmann
  • D. Nolte
  • R. Hilker
Original Communication

Abstract

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is the most frequent inherited cerebellar ataxia in Europe, the US and Japan, leading to disability and death through motor complications. Although the affected protein ataxin-3 is found ubiquitously in the brain, grey matter atrophy is predominant in the cerebellum and the brainstem. White matter pathology is generally less severe and thought to occur in the brainstem, spinal cord, and cerebellar white matter. Here, we investigated both grey and white matter pathology in a group of 12 SCA3 patients and matched controls. We used voxel-based morphometry for analysis of tissue loss, and tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) on diffusion magnetic resonance imaging to investigate microstructural pathology. We analysed correlations between microstructural properties of the brain and ataxia severity, as measured by the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score. SCA3 patients exhibited significant loss of both grey and white matter in the cerebellar hemispheres, brainstem including pons and in lateral thalamus. On between-group analysis, TBSS detected widespread microstructural white matter pathology in the cerebellum, brainstem, and bilaterally in thalamus and the cerebral hemispheres. Furthermore, fractional anisotropy in a white matter network comprising frontal, thalamic, brainstem and left cerebellar white matter strongly and negatively correlated with SARA ataxia scores. Tractography identified the thalamic white matter thus implicated as belonging to ventrolateral thalamus. Disruption of white matter integrity in patients suffering from SCA3 is more widespread than previously thought. Moreover, our data provide evidence that microstructural white matter changes in SCA3 are strongly related to the clinical severity of ataxia symptoms.

Keywords

Spinocerebellar ataxia 3 Machado-Joseph disease DTI Diffusion Ataxia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Goethe-University of Frankfurt.

Conflicts of interest

Jun-Suk Kang received honoraria and travel funding from GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen Pharma, Merz Pharma, Teva Pharma, and Medtronic. Johannes C Klein reports no financial disclosures. Simon Baudrexel reports no financial disclosures. Dagmar Nolte reports no financial disclosures. Ruediger Hilker has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic, Orion, GlaxoSmithKline, TEVA, Cephalon, Solvay, Desitin, and Boehringer Ingelheim as well as travel funding from Medtronic and Cephalon; serves or has served on a scientific advisory board for Cephalon; and has received research funding from the Deutsche Parkinson Vereinigung (dPV), Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung and the Goethe-University of Frankfurt.

Supplementary material

415_2013_7186_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (23 kb)
Supplementary Table 1: Clusters of grey and white matter loss, together with the MNI-space coordinate and p-value of the cluster peak. (PDF 22 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Rub U, Brunt ER, Deller T (2008) New insights into the pathoanatomy of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (Machado-Joseph disease). Curr Opin Neurol 21(2):111–116. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3282f7673d CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gatchel JR, Zoghbi HY (2005) Diseases of unstable repeat expansion: mechanisms and common principles. Nat Rev Genet 6(10):743–755. doi: 10.1038/nrg1691 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paulson HL, Das SS, Crino PB, Perez MK, Patel SC, Gotsdiner D, Fischbeck KH, Pittman RN (1997) Machado-Joseph disease gene product is a cytoplasmic protein widely expressed in brain. Ann Neurol 41(4):453–462. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410408 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ross CA (1997) Intranuclear neuronal inclusions: a common pathogenic mechanism for glutamine-repeat neurodegenerative diseases? Neuron 19(6):1147–1150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schols L, Bauer P, Schmidt T, Schulte T, Riess O (2004) Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: clinical features, genetics, and pathogenesis. Lancet Neurol 3(5):291–304. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00737-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lukas C, Schols L, Bellenberg B, Rub U, Przuntek H, Schmid G, Koster O, Suchan B (2006) Dissociation of grey and white matter reduction in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 and 6: a voxel-based morphometry study. Neurosci Lett 408(3):230–235. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klockgether T, Skalej M, Wedekind D, Luft AR, Welte D, Schulz JB, Abele M, Burk K, Laccone F, Brice A, Dichgans J (1998) Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I. MRI-based volumetry of posterior fossa structures and basal ganglia in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2 and 3. Brain 121(Pt 9):1687–1693CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacobi H, Hauser TK, Giunti P, Globas C, Bauer P, Schmitz-Hubsch T, Baliko L, Filla A, Mariotti C, Rakowicz M, Charles P, Ribai P, Szymanski S, Infante J, van de Warrenburg BP, Durr A, Timmann D, Boesch S, Fancellu R, Rola R, Depondt C, Schols L, Zdzienicka E, Kang JS, Ratzka S, Kremer B, Stephenson DA, Melegh B, Pandolfo M, Tezenas du Montcel S, Borkert J, Schulz JB, Klockgether T (2012) Spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3 and 6: the clinical spectrum of ataxia and morphometric brainstem and cerebellar findings. Cerebellum 11(1):155–166. doi: 10.1007/s12311-011-0292-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schulz JB, Borkert J, Wolf S, Schmitz-Hubsch T, Rakowicz M, Mariotti C, Schols L, Timmann D, van de Warrenburg B, Durr A, Pandolfo M, Kang JS, Mandly AG, Nagele T, Grisoli M, Boguslawska R, Bauer P, Klockgether T, Hauser TK (2010) Visualization, quantification and correlation of brain atrophy with clinical symptoms in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 3 and 6. Neuroimage 49(1):158–168. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D’Abreu A, Franca MC Jr, Yasuda CL, Campos BA, Lopes-Cendes I, Cendes F (2012) Neocortical atrophy in Machado-Joseph disease: a longitudinal neuroimaging study. J Neuroimaging 22(3):285–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00614.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guimaraes RP, D’Abreu A, Yasuda CL, Franca MC Jr, Silva BH, Cappabianco FA, Bergo FP, Lopes-Cendes IT, Cendes F (2013) A multimodal evaluation of microstructural white matter damage in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. Mov Disord. doi: 10.1002/mds.25451 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ciccarelli O, Behrens TE, Altmann DR, Orrell RW, Howard RS, Johansen-Berg H, Miller DH, Matthews PM, Thompson AJ (2006) Probabilistic diffusion tractography: a potential tool to assess the rate of disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 129:1859–1871CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benedetti B, Rocca MA, Rovaris M, Caputo D, Zaffaroni M, Capra R, Bertolotto A, Martinelli V, Comi G, Filippi M (2010) A diffusion tensor MRI study of cervical cord damage in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81(1):26–30. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.173120 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klein JC, Lorenz B, Kang JS, Baudrexel S, Seifried C, van de Loo S, Steinmetz H, Deichmann R, Hilker R (2011) Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter involvement in essential tremor. Hum Brain Mapp 32(6):896–904. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21077 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schmitz-Hubsch T, du Montcel ST, Baliko L, Berciano J, Boesch S, Depondt C, Giunti P, Globas C, Infante J, Kang JS, Kremer B, Mariotti C, Melegh B, Pandolfo M, Rakowicz M, Ribai P, Rola R, Schols L, Szymanski S, van de Warrenburg BP, Durr A, Klockgether T, Fancellu R (2006) Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology 66(11):1717–1720. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frahm J, Haase A, Matthaei D (1986) Rapid NMR imaging of dynamic processes using the FLASH technique. Magn Reson Med 3(2):321–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turner R, Le Bihan D, Chesnick AS (1991) Echo-planar imaging of diffusion and perfusion. Magn Reson Med 19(2):247–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A (2002) Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 47(6):1202–1210. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10171 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, De Stefano N, Brady JM, Matthews PM (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23(Suppl 1):S208–S219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, Henson RN, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS (2001) A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 14(1 Pt 1):21–36. doi: 10.1006/nimg 2001.0786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S (2002) Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17(2):825–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, Watkins KE, Ciccarelli O, Cader MZ, Matthews PM, Behrens TEJ (2006) Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 31(4):1487–1505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eichler L, Bellenberg B, Hahn HK, Koster O, Schols L, Lukas C (2011) Quantitative assessment of brain stem and cerebellar atrophy in spinocerebellar ataxia types 3 and 6: impact on clinical status. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(5):890–897. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2387 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rub U, Brunt ER, Petrasch-Parwez E, Schols L, Theegarten D, Auburger G, Seidel K, Schultz C, Gierga K, Paulson H, van Broeckhoven C, Deller T, de Vos RA (2006) Degeneration of ingestion-related brainstem nuclei in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2, 3, 6 and 7. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 32(6):635–649. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2006.00772.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rub U, Del Turco D, Del Tredici K, de Vos RA, Brunt ER, Reifenberger G, Seifried C, Schultz C, Auburger G, Braak H (2003) Thalamic involvement in a spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) and a spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) patient, and its clinical relevance. Brain 126(Pt 10):2257–2272. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg234 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Asanuma C, Thach WT, Jones EG (1983) Distribution of cerebellar terminations and their relation to other afferent terminations in the ventral lateral thalamic region of the monkey. Brain Res 286(3):237–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jones DK, Horsfield MA, Simmons A (1999) Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 42(3):515–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Basser PJ, Mattiello J, Lebihan D (1994) MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 66(1):259–267PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Beaulieu C (2009) The biological basis of diffusion anisotropy. In: Johansen-Berg H, Behrens TEJ (eds) Diffusion MRI. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 105–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Cercignani M (2009) About “axial” and “radial” diffusivities. Magn Reson Med 61(5):1255–1260. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21965 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rub U, Gierga K, Brunt ER, de Vos RA, Bauer M, Schols L, Burk K, Auburger G, Bohl J, Schultz C, Vuksic M, Burbach GJ, Braak H, Deller T (2005) Spinocerebellar ataxias types 2 and 3: degeneration of the pre-cerebellar nuclei isolates the three phylogenetically defined regions of the cerebellum. J Neural Transm 112(11):1523–1545. doi: 10.1007/s00702-005-0287-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yamada M, Tan CF, Inenaga C, Tsuji S, Takahashi H (2004) Sharing of polyglutamine localization by the neuronal nucleus and cytoplasm in CAG-repeat diseases. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 30(6):665–675. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2004.00583.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Iwabuchi K, Tsuchiya K, Uchihara T, Yagishita S (1999) Autosomal dominant spinocerebellar degenerations. Clinical, pathological, and genetic correlations. Rev Neurol 155(4):255–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Evert BO, Schelhaas J, Fleischer H, de Vos RA, Brunt ER, Stenzel W, Klockgether T, Wullner U (2006) Neuronal intranuclear inclusions, dysregulation of cytokine expression and cell death in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. Clin Neuropathol 25(6):272–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Durr A, Stevanin G, Cancel G, Duyckaerts C, Abbas N, Didierjean O, Chneiweiss H, Benomar A, Lyon-Caen O, Julien J, Serdaru M, Penet C, Agid Y, Brice A (1996) Spinocerebellar ataxia 3 and Machado-Joseph disease: clinical, molecular, and neuropathological features. Ann Neurol 39(4):490–499. doi: 10.1002/ana.410390411 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yamada M, Sato T, Tsuji S, Takahashi H (2008) CAG repeat disorder models and human neuropathology: similarities and differences. Acta Neuropathol 115(1):71–86. doi: 10.1007/s00401-007-0287-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yamada M, Hayashi S, Tsuji S, Takahashi H (2001) Involvement of the cerebral cortex and autonomic ganglia in Machado-Joseph disease. Acta Neuropathol 101(2):140–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Matos CA, de Macedo-Ribeiro S, Carvalho AL (2011) Polyglutamine diseases: the special case of ataxin-3 and Machado-Joseph disease. Prog Neurobiol 95(1):26–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.06.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johansen-Berg H, Behrens TEJ, Sillery E, Ciccarelli O, Thompson AJ, Smith SM, Matthews PM (2005) Functional-anatomical validation and individual variation of diffusion tractography-based segmentation of the human thalamus. Cereb Cortex 15(1):31–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Klein JC, Barbe MT, Seifried C, Baudrexel S, Runge M, Maarouf M, Gasser T, Hattingen E, Liebig T, Deichmann R, Timmermann L, Weise L, Hilker R (2012) The tremor network targeted by successful VIM deep brain stimulation in humans. Neurology 78(11):787–795. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318249f702 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Percheron G, Francois C, Talbi B, Meder JF, Fenelon G, Yelnik J (1993) The primate motor thalamus analysed with reference to subcortical afferent territories. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 60(1–3):32–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.-S. Kang
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. C. Klein
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Baudrexel
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. Deichmann
    • 2
  • D. Nolte
    • 3
  • R. Hilker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyGoethe-University of FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.Brain Imaging Center (BIC)Goethe-University of FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity of GiessenGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations