Journal of Neurology

, Volume 260, Issue 9, pp 2297–2305 | Cite as

Clinical efficacy of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of the DEFINE study

  • Amit Bar-Or
  • Ralf Gold
  • Ludwig Kappos
  • Douglas L. Arnold
  • Gavin Giovannoni
  • Krzysztof Selmaj
  • John O’Gorman
  • Monica Stephan
  • Katherine T. Dawson
Original Communication

Abstract

In the double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 DEFINE study in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, oral BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) significantly reduced the proportion of patients relapsed (primary endpoint), the annualized relapse rate (ARR), and confirmed disability progression (secondary endpoints) at two years compared with placebo. We investigated the efficacy of BG-12 240 mg twice daily (BID) and three times daily (TID) in patient subgroups stratified according to baseline demographic and disease characteristics including gender, age, relapse history, McDonald criteria, treatment history, expanded disability status scale score, T2 lesion volume, and gadolinium-enhancing lesions. The clinical efficacy of BG-12 was generally consistent across patient subgroups and reflected positive findings in the overall DEFINE study population. Treatment with BG-12 BID and TID reduced the proportion of patients relapsed and the ARR at two years compared with placebo in all patient subgroups. Reductions in the risk of relapse with BG-12 BID vs. placebo ranged from 68 % [hazard ratio 0.32 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.16–0.62)] to 26 % [0.74 (0.51–1.09)] and from 66 % [0.34 (0.23–0.50)] to 25 % [0.75 (0.42–1.36)] with BG-12 TID vs. placebo. BG-12 also reduced the risk of disability progression at two years compared with placebo in most subgroups of patients treated with the BID dosing regimen and in all subgroups treated with the TID regimen. These analyses indicate that treatment with BG-12 is consistently effective across a wide spectrum of patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis with varied demographic and disease characteristics.

Keywords

BG-12 Dimethyl fumarate Multiple sclerosis Randomized controlled trial Subgroup analysis 

Supplementary material

415_2013_6954_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (427 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 426 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    US Food and Drug Administration (2013) TECFIDERA™ prescribing information. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/204063lbl.pdf. Accessed 2 Apr 2013
  2. 2.
    Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL, Bar-Or A, Giavannoni G, Selmaj K, Tornatore C, Sweetser MT, Yang M, Sheikh SI, Dawson KT, on behalf of the DEFINE Study Investigators (2012) Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 367:1098–1107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fox RJ, Miller DH, Phillips JT, Hutchinson M, Havrdova E, Kita M, Yang M, Raghupathi K, Novas M, Sweetser MT, Viglietta V, Dawson KT, on behalf of the CONFIRM Study Investigators (2012) Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 367:1087–1097PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chofflon M (2005) Mechanisms of action for treatments in multiple sclerosis: Does a heterogeneous disease demand a multi-targeted therapeutic approach? BioDrugs 19:299–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Degenhardt A, Ramagopalan SV, Scalfari A, Ebers GC (2009) Clinical prognostic factors in multiple sclerosis: a natural history review. Nat Rev Neurol 5:672–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Disanto G, Berlanga AJ, Handel AE, Para AE, Burrell AM, Fries A, Handunnetthi L, De Luca GC, Morahan JM (2010) Heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis: scratching the surface of a complex disease. Autoimmune Dis 2011:932351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mowry EM (2011) Natural history of multiple sclerosis: early prognostic factors. Neurol Clin 29:279–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Renoux C (2011) Natural history of multiple sclerosis: long-term prognostic factors. Neurol Clin 29:293–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brex PA, Ciccarelli O, O’Riordan JI, Sailer M, Thompson AJ, Miller DH (2002) A longitudinal study of abnormalities on MRI and disability from multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 346:158–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Confavreux C, Vukusic S, Adeleine P (2003) Early clinical predictors and progression of irreversible disability in multiple sclerosis: an amnesic process. Brain 126:770–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Losseff NA, Miller DH, Kidd D, Thompson AJ (2001) The predictive value of gadolinium enhancement for long term disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis—preliminary results. Mult Scler 7:23–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scott TF, Schramke CJ, Novero J, Chieffe C (2000) Short-term prognosis in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 55:689–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Metz LM, McFarland HF, O’Connor PW, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Weinshenker BG, Wolinsky JS (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 58:840–846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ICH harmonised tripartite guideline—guideline for good clinical practice: E6 (R1) (1996) International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, June 10, 1996. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6_R1/Step4/E6_R1__Guideline.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2011
  16. 16.
    World Medical Association (2010) Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/. Accessed 22 Nov 2010
  17. 17.
    European Medicines Agency (EMA) (2006) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on clinical investigation of medicinal products for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003485.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2011
  18. 18.
    Hutchinson M, Fox RJ, Miller DH, Phillips JT, Kita M, Havrdova E, O’Gorman J, Zhang R, Novas M, Viglietta V, Dawson KT (2013) Clinical efficacy of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of the CONFIRM study. J Neurol. doi:10.1007/s00415-013-6968-1
  19. 19.
    Kappos L, Gold R, Miller DH, Macmanus DG, Havrdova E, Limmroth V, Polman CH, Schmierer K, Yousry TA, Eraksoy M, Meluzinova E, Dufek M, Yang M, Dawson K, O’Neill GN (2012) Effect of BG-12 on contrast-enhanced lesions in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses from the phase 2b study. Mult Scler 18:314–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coles AJ, Fox E, Vladic A, Gazda SK, Brinar V, Selmaj KW, Bass AD, Wynn DR, Margolin DH, Lake SL, Moran S, Palmer J, Smith MS, Compston DA (2011) Alemtuzumab versus interferon beta-1a in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: post hoc and subset analyses of clinical efficacy outcomes. Lancet Neurol 10:338–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Devonshire V, Havrdova E, Radue EW, O’Connor P, Zhang-Auberson L, Agoropoulou C, Haring DA, Francis G, Kappos L (2012) Relapse and disability outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod: subgroup analyses of the double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled FREEDOMS study. Lancet Neurol 11:420–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giovannoni G, Cook S, Rammohan K, Rieckmann P, Sørensen PS, Vermersch P, Hamlett A, Viglietta V, Greenberg S (2011) Sustained disease-activity-free status in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with cladribine tablets in the CLARITY study: a post hoc and subgroup analysis. Lancet Neurol 10:329–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Calabresi PA, Confavreux C, Giovannoni G, Galetta SL, Havrdova E, Lublin FD, Miller DH, O’Connor PW, Phillips JT, Polman CH, Radue EW, Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Wajgt A, Weinstock-Guttman B, Wynn DR, Lynn F, Panzara MA (2009) The efficacy of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of AFFIRM and SENTINEL. J Neurol 256:405–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miller AE, O’Connor P, Wolinsky JS, Confavreux C, Kappos L, Olsson TP, Truffinet P, Wang L, D’Castro L, Comi G, Freedman MS (2012) Pre-specified subgroup analyses of a placebo-controlled phase III trial (TEMSO) of oral teriflunomide in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 18:1625–1632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tremlett H, Zhao Y, Joseph J, Devonshire V (2008) Relapses in multiple sclerosis are age- and time-dependent. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:1368–1374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amit Bar-Or
    • 1
  • Ralf Gold
    • 2
  • Ludwig Kappos
    • 3
  • Douglas L. Arnold
    • 1
    • 4
  • Gavin Giovannoni
    • 5
  • Krzysztof Selmaj
    • 6
  • John O’Gorman
    • 7
  • Monica Stephan
    • 7
  • Katherine T. Dawson
    • 7
  1. 1.Montreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.St. Josef HospitalRuhr UniversityBochumGermany
  3. 3.University Hospital Basel, NeurologyBaselSwitzerland
  4. 4.NeuroRx ResearchMontrealCanada
  5. 5.Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and DentistryQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
  6. 6.Medical University of LodzLodzPoland
  7. 7.Biogen Idec Inc.WestonUSA

Personalised recommendations