Sex ratio of multiple sclerosis in persons born from 1930 to 1979 and its relation to latitude in Norway
- 432 Downloads
A remarkable increase in female to male ratio of multiple sclerosis (MS) is recognised in high incidence areas. Norway is a high-risk area for MS, spanning latitudes 58–71°N. We studied whether the sex ratio has changed over time and whether it differs by clinical phenotype or by latitude. Population-based epidemiological data and data from the Norwegian MS Registry on patients born from 1930 to 1979 were combined in this study. Place of birth was retrieved from the Norwegian Population Registry and information on clinical subtypes was obtained from the Norwegian MS Registry. The female to male ratio ranged from 1.7 to 2.7 (median 2.0) in 5,469 patients born in Norway, and increased slightly by 5-year blocks of year of birth (p = 0.043). The sex ratio was 2.6:1 in 825 patients born 1970–1979, which is significantly higher than in those born 1930–1969 (p < 0.001). In patients with relapsing remitting onset, the sex ratio was 2.4:1, while it was 1.1:1 in those with primary progressive disease. The sex ratio did not differ between the south, the middle and the north of the country. The overall sex ratio of MS is strongly determined by cases with relapsing remitting onset. We did not observe the remarkable increase in sex ratios of MS reported from other high-risk areas. The high sex ratio in the youngest birth cohorts may change as an increasing proportion of cases in this age group is being diagnosed. Sex ratio was not associated with latitude.
KeywordsMultiple sclerosis Clinical phenotype Sex ratio Vitamin D Latitude Ultraviolet radiation
The authors wish to thank Cathrine Smestad for data collection from the Oslo MS registry. This work was financially supported by the Neuromuscular Diseases Research Group at the University of Tromsø.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 11.Freisling H, Fahey MT, Moskal A, Ocke MC, Ferrari P, Jenab M, Norat T, Naska A, Welch AA, Navarro C, Schulz M, Wirfalt E, Casagrande C, Amiano P, Ardanaz E, Parr C, Engeset D, Grioni S, Sera F, Bueno-de-Mesquita B, van der Schouw YT, Touvier M, Boutron-Ruault MC, Halkjaer J, Dahm CC, Khaw KT, Crowe F, Linseisen J, Kroger J, Huybrechts I, Deharveng G, Manjer J, Agren A, Trichopoulou A, Tsiotas K, Riboli E, Bingham S, Slimani N (2010) Region-specific nutrient intake patterns exhibit a geographical gradient within and between European countries. J Nutr 140:1280–1286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, McFarland HF, Paty DW, Polman CH, Reingold SC, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Sibley W, Thompson A, van den NS, Weinshenker BY, Wolinsky JS (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50:121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Ponsonby AL, Lucas RM, van der Mei IA, Dear K, Valery PC, Pender MP, Taylor BV, Kilpatrick TJ, Coulthard A, Chapman C, Williams D, McMichael AJ, Dwyer T (2012) Offspring number, pregnancy, and risk of a first clinical demyelinating event: the AusImmune Study. Neurology 78:867–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar