Journal of Neurology

, Volume 260, Issue 4, pp 1009–1013 | Cite as

Normal pressure hydrocephalus or progressive supranuclear palsy? A clinicopathological case series

  • Nadia K. Magdalinou
  • Helen Ling
  • James D. Shand Smith
  • Jonathan M. Schott
  • Laurence D. Watkins
  • Andrew J. Lees
Original Communication


Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a poorly understood condition, which typically presents with the triad of balance impairment, urinary incontinence and subacute cognitive decline, while brain imaging shows a marked enlargement of the cerebral ventricles. Few patients with iNPH have come to post-mortem. We identified four patients from the Queen Square Brain Bank archival collection, who had received a diagnosis of iNPH during life, and reviewed their clinical, radiological and pathological characteristics. At post mortem examination, one patient had Parkinson’s disease (PD) while the other three had progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). All four had presented with pure akinesia with gait freezing, accompanied by unsteadiness and falls. An awareness that PSP or PD can mimic the clinical symptoms of iNPH may help to avoid invasive and futile cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures.


Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) Ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt Pure akinesia with gait freezing (PAGF) Alzheimer’s disease (AD) 


Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a clinical syndrome characterised by unsteadiness of gait, urinary incontinence and cognitive decline, which can respond to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage [1]. The radiological “hallmark” of NPH is markedly enlarged ventricles in the absence of involutional change in the brain. NPH has been categorized as either idiopathic (iNPH) or secondary (following head trauma, intracranial haemorrhage, tumour, meningitis or complication of cranial surgery).

iNPH remains a controversial entity, and of the relatively few patients coming to autopsy, a significant proportion have been noted to have co-existing neurodegenerative or vascular pathologies [2, 3]. Whether those pathologies are the primary cause of the syndrome or an additional incidental disease process in the elderly population affected is uncertain.

Two recent reviews have reported the post-mortem findings of 38 patients that had been clinically diagnosed with iNPH with vascular changes (71 %), Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (61 %), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) (2.6 %) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD) (2.6 %) being the most frequent co-existing pathologies. None of these patients had iNPH as the only final clinical diagnosis [2, 3] and no specific neuropathological changes for iNPH were identified [5]. Some of the patients had an unsuccessful shunt procedure, raising questions about the accuracy of diagnosis in these particular cases.

In a prospective study of 37 patients who underwent shunting for iNPH, a high prevalence of AD pathology was found in cortical biopsies obtained during shunt insertion. Patients with moderate to severe pathology failed to demonstrate benefit on any study measures assessing gait, cognition and bladder control at 4 months follow-up [4].

Hydrocephalus in elderly rats can induce both amyloid beta (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau accumulation in a pattern similar to human AD. CSF dynamics also appeared to impair Aβ clearance as a result of impaired CSF circulation [5].

In the present study, we aimed to review the clinical, radiological and pathological characteristics of four patients who had received a clinical diagnosis of iNPH.


We reviewed the database of 1,450 brains in the Queen Square Brain Bank (QSBB). The retention of and access to clinical records and pathological material at QSBB has generic ethical approval from the London Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee.

Our inclusion criteria were patients aged 50 years or above exhibiting: (1) presence of at least two of the following symptoms or signs (a) a progressive gait impairment, (b) severe urinary difficulties, (c) cognitive decline; and (2) markedly enlarged cerebral ventricles on computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head who underwent an invasive diagnostic (high volume lumbar puncture) or therapeutic procedure (insertion of a ventriculo-peritoneal [VP] shunt) [6] for the evaluation or treatment of suspected NPH. Patients with a history of congenital hydrocephalus, venous sinus thrombosis, central nervous system infections or obstructive lesions were excluded.

A systematic review of all available medical records was performed. Case notes were reviewed by one of the authors (NKM). The neuropathological diagnosis of all cases was made by a neuropathologist at the QSBB (JH or TR). Case 3 has been previously published [7].


In four cases (0.3 %), a clinical diagnosis of NPH was made by either a neurosurgeon or neurologist. All patients had been assessed during life by at least one neurologist, and three out of four by a movement disorders specialist. Their demographic and clinical features are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Table showing clinical characteristics of four patients initially diagnosed with normal pressure hydrocephalus


Case 1

Case 2

Case 3 [7]

Case 4

Age of onset (years)










Presenting complaint

Difficulty walking, unsteadiness

Poor mobility, recurrent falls

Difficulty walking

Unsteadiness, falls

Disease duration at presentation

3 years

2 years

4 months

2 years

Initial clinical features

Generalised slowing down, no tremor, postural instability, deterioration in handwriting, but no micrographia

Mild cognitive impairment, dysarthria, generalised slowing down, no tremor, brisk lower limb reflexes

Hypomimia, no hypophonia, slow and broad-based gait, difficulty in gait initiation and turning, mild right sided rigidity and bradykinesia, no tremor, micrographia

Unsteady gait, tendency to veer to the left, no tremor or rigidity, mild urinary urgency and occasional incontinence, mild cognitive decline and bradyphrenia, micrographia

Late clinical features

Severe hypomimia and hypophonia, severe axial and mild symmetrical limb rigidity, no bradykinesia, freezing, positive Applause sign, significant cognitive decline (MMSE 14/30)

Slurring dysarthria and hypophonia, mild symmetrical limb rigidity and bradykinesia, wide-based unsteady gait, bradyphrenia and cognitive decline, grasp and palmomental reflexes bilaterally

Mild hypomimia, moderate hypophonia and dysarthria, gait initiation failure and freezing, severe axial and moderate symmetrical limb rigidity, mild bradykinesia, bradyphrenia and cognitive decline (MMSE 22/30)

Slurring dysarthria and dysphagia, frontalis overactivity, severe axial rigidity, moderate bilateral cogwheel rigidity, unsteady gait even when using frame, freezing episodes, utilisation behaviour and perseveration, dysexecutive syndrome

Eye movement signs (years after presentation)

4 years

3 years

4 years

6 years

Slow hypometric vertical saccades

Marked restriction in vertical eye movements

Slow horizontal and vertical saccades

Reduced upgaze

Reduced vertical gaze

Slow horizontal saccades

Urinary symptoms (years after presentation)

3 years

5 years

4 years

At presentation

Urinary urgency and incontinence

Urinary incontinence at night

Urinary incontinence

Urinary urgency and incontinence

l-dopa response


No response

No response

No record of response

Maximum l-dopa treatment

600 mg/day

900 mg/day

400 mg/day

300 mg/day

Response to CSF removal

Borderline improvement

Significant improvement

Significant improvement

N/A—VP shunt without a trial of CSF removal

VP shunt

Suggested by neurosurgeons, but advised against by neurologist

Suggested by neurosurgeons, but advised against by neurologist

VP shunt inserted with some improvement in gait and cognitive function

VP shunt inserted with moderate improvement in gait and cognitive function

Secondary NPH risk factors


Subarachnoid haemorrhage


Anterior cervical decompression for spondylosis, syringomyelia

Initial clinical diagnosis

NPH and secondary parkinsonism




Final clinical diagnosis





Time from initial to revision of diagnosis

4 years

2 years

4 years

4 years

Disease duration (y)





Pathological diagnosis





Pathological ageing

Pathological ageing

SVD (moderate)

Pathological ageing

SVD (moderate)

Amyloid angiopathy (moderate)

SVD (mild)

NPH normal pressure hydrocephalus, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, VP ventriculo-peritoneal, PSP progressive supranuclear palsy, PAGF pure akinesia with gait freezing, SVD small vessel disease

All four patients presented with difficulty walking and falls, postural instability, and mild subcortical or executive dysfunction. Three patients had mild difficulties with swallowing. Case 4 had urinary urgency. Two had risk factors for secondary NPH (Table 1).

Neurological findings of all patients prior to the diagnosis of NPH revealed a slow, broad based and unsteady gait with minimal limb rigidity. None of the patients had tremor or an eye movement abnormality. The Mini-Mental Score Examination (MMSE) ranged from 26 to 28 out of 30.

On neuroimaging (two patients had CTs and two had MRIs), all patients had ventricular dilatation disproportionate to the degree of cortical atrophy on visual assessment. In the second MRI of case 4 (6 years into the disease) midbrain atrophy and the ‘hummingbird’ sign was also noted.

Three patients had transient improvement in 10-m walk and mental tasks (cases 1, 2 and 3) after 13–40 mls of CSF withdrawal. CSF opening pressure was 13 cmH2O in case 1 and 21 cmH2O in case 3. It was not recorded in case 2 as lumbar puncture was done with patient seated. case 4 did not undergo trial of CSF withdrawal prior to VP shunting as gait dysfunction, cognitive decline, urinary disturbance and imaging studies were thought to be highly typical of NPH.

Two patients underwent VP shunting with transient improvement in gait and cognition. In the other two patients (cases 1 and 2), VP shunting was suggested by neurosurgeons but the decision was made by neurologists not to proceed, as they felt there was an underlying co-existing neurodegenerative condition.

All four patients had striking gait instability, falls and freezing initially. Progressive cognitive decline, significant urinary disturbance, eye movement abnormalities, hypomimia and hypophonia occurred later in the disease course. These later features prompted the neurologists that shunt-responsive NPH was not the underlying diagnosis.

At post-mortem, case 1 was found to have Parkinson’s disease (PD) and the other three patients had pathologies consistent with PSP. All patients had additional mild to moderate pathological ageing changes and three patients had evidence of small vessel disease. Figure 1 shows moderate dilatation of left lateral ventricle with frontal atrophy in case 4.
Fig. 1

Case 4 (pathological diagnosis: PSP) showing moderate dilatation of left lateral ventricle with frontal atrophy


We report four patients in whom an initial diagnosis of iNPH was considered and who had at least a transient response to large volume CSF drainage or VP shunt. However, all patients subsequently deteriorated, and further progression of their disease led to the revision of the final clinical diagnosis to PSP. None of the cases had iNPH as their most likely clinical diagnosis at the time of death. One patient had a pathological diagnosis of PD, while PSP was confirmed in the other three cases. The QSBB collection is probably biased towards cases with an unclear clinical diagnosis and this could account for the high prevalence of neurodegenerative pathology among its cases diagnosed as iNPH.

All four patients had presented with gait ignition failure and freezing, a clinical picture most commonly associated with diffuse cerebrovascular disease and less commonly with PSP or PD [8, 9]. The PSP-PAGF (pure akinesia with gait freezing) subtype usually develops vertical supranuclear gaze palsy later in the disease course, and in post-mortem has milder tau pathology when compared to the classical Richardson’s syndrome [9]. In the present series, eye-movement abnormalities also occurred late in the disease course, and thus none of the patients fulfilled the NINDS-SPSP criteria for PSP in the early stages [10]. Furthermore, none of the patients had the “extended lumbar drainage protocol” which is regarded as the gold standard for the presumptive diagnosis of NPH, increasing the chance of long-term benefit from shunting to 80 % [11].

All of the patients followed a relatively benign disease course, remaining independent until a few months before death, when significant cognitive and mobility impairment, urinary incontinence and, in case 4, severe dysphagia and unintelligible speech ensued.

Excess ventricular expansion with disproportionally large ventricles for the degree of cortical atrophy can occur in PSP [12]. Recurrent falls can also lead to head injuries and subdural haematomas in patients with PSP, resulting in secondary NPH. In our series, two patients carried a risk of developing secondary NPH as a result of previous subarachnoid haemorrhage and syringomyelia warranting spinal surgery. Case 1 had sustained a left neck of femur fracture after a fall.

In a recent Mayo Clinic community-based study, iNPH was found to be relatively rare (1.19 per 100,000 per year) with an incidence approximating that of PSP [6]. Additional or alternative neurologic diagnoses later emerged in 5 of 12 patients, one having pathologically proven PSP. None of these patients had sustained definitive improvement after shunting and in the PSP case, it was speculated that the later-diagnosed disorder had been responsible for the entire clinical picture [6].

At the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, 24 out of 87 patients (age 56–92 years) who were diagnosed as iNPH and underwent VP shunting from 2004 to 2011 showed progressive neurological features, which could not be accounted for by a diagnosis of optimally treated NPH. These 24 patients were later referred to neurologists for further assessment, and their revised clinical diagnoses are summarised in Table 2. Fourteen of the patients have since died, although none received post mortem examination. The remaining 49 patients reported benefit from shunting ranging from modest to excellent.
Table 2

Revised clinical diagnosis for patients diagnosed as iNPH (with VP shunts) in the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery

Clinical diagnosis

Number of patients (n = 24)

PD/atypical parkinsonism/progressive gait apraxia/vascular parkinsonism


AD/vascular dementia/progressive cognitive decline


‘Progression of underlying condition, undergoing investigations’


PD Parkinson’s disease, AD Alzheimer’s disease

The transient improvement following CSF removal in all cases raises the question of whether this may be a useful therapeutic strategy in PSP. Although therapeutic CSF drainage has not been used in PSP, it has been used in vascular parkinsonism (VP). Out of 40 patients with VP who were treated with large-volume CSF removal, almost 40 % reported significant gait improvement [13]. Although a placebo response cannot be excluded, one possible explanation for this initial clinical improvement could be renewal of ‘stagnant’ CSF, which increases the ability to ‘clear’ potentially toxic metabolites, such as Aβ or tau proteins. Alteration in ventricular compliance may also cause partly reversible gait dysfunction via disruption of ascending and descending periventricular tracts [7].

Cognitive impairment in NPH might also be a result of a combination of CSF dynamic disturbance and its resulting biochemical abnormalities [14]. In a recent study of 21 patients with NPH, a combination of Aβ and total tau levels in ventricular CSF predicted favourable surgical outcomes with a sensitivity of 80 % and a specificity of 82.4 % [15]. VP shunting in 35 patients with NPH led to a reduction in CSF neurofilament proteins which are markers of axonal damage, resolution of periventricular white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and clinical improvement in 28 patients 3 months after shunt insertion [16]. In another study, 12 of 17 patients with NPH had parkinsonism (71 %) which significantly improved and, in 11 patients WMH resolved following CSF tap tests or shunt operations [17]. Nevertheless, it is not known if these biochemical, radiological and clinical improvements are sustained in long-term follow-up.


iNPH is uncommon and a diagnosis of exclusion [2]. The absence of urinary incontinence and the presence of a supranuclear gaze palsy in a suspected case of iNPH should lead to reconsideration of the diagnosis and raise the possibility of the PAGF variant of PSP which is unresponsive to shunting.



We wish to thank the donors and their families, without whom this work would not have been possible. We received funding from the Reta Lila Weston Trust.

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Etical standard

All human studies must state that they have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down by the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.


  1. 1.
    Bergsneider M et al (2005) Surgical management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57(3 Suppl):S29–S39 discussion ii-vPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cabral D et al (2011) Frequency of Alzheimer’s disease pathology at autopsy in patients with clinical normal pressure hydrocephalus. Alzheimer’s & dementia: j Alzheimer’s Assoc 7(5):509–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leinonen V et al (2012) Post-mortem findings in 10 patients with presumed normal-pressure hydrocephalus and review of the literature. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 38(1):72–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamilton R et al (2010) Lack of shunt response in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with Alzheimer disease pathology. Ann Neurol 68(4):535–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silverberg GD et al (2010) Amyloid and Tau accumulate in the brains of aged hydrocephalic rats. Brain Res 1317:286–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klassen BT, Ahlskog JE (2011) Normal pressure hydrocephalus: how often does the diagnosis hold water? Neurology 77(12):1119–1125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schott JM et al (2007) Shunt responsive progressive supranuclear palsy? Mov Disord 22(6):902–903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Factor SA (2008) The clinical spectrum of freezing of gait in atypical parkinsonism. Mov Disord 23(Suppl 2):S431–S438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williams DR et al (2007) Pure akinesia with gait freezing: a third clinical phenotype of progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov disord: off J Mov Disord Soc 22(15):2235–2241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Litvan I et al (1996) Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDS-SPSP international workshop. Neurology 47(1):1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marmarou A et al (2005) The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57(3 Suppl):S17–S28 discussion ii-vPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paviour DC et al (2006) Longitudinal MRI in progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy: rates and regions of atrophy. Brain: J Neurol 129(Pt 4):1040–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ondo WG, Chan LL, Levy JK (2002) Vascular parkinsonism: clinical correlates predicting motor improvement after lumbar puncture. Mov Disord 17(1):91–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tarnaris A et al (2011) Cognitive, biochemical, and imaging profile of patients suffering from idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Alzheimer’s and Dementia 7(5):501–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tarnaris A et al (2011) Use of cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-beta and total tau protein to predict favorable surgical outcomes in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 115(1):145–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tullberg M et al (2007) Ventricular cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament protein levels decrease in parallel with white matter pathology after shunt surgery in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur J Neurol 14(3):248–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akiguchi I et al (2008) Shunt-responsive parkinsonism and reversible white matter lesions in patients with idiopathic NPH. J Neurol 255(9):1392–1399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadia K. Magdalinou
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Helen Ling
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • James D. Shand Smith
    • 5
  • Jonathan M. Schott
    • 4
  • Laurence D. Watkins
    • 5
  • Andrew J. Lees
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Reta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological StudiesUCLLondonUK
  2. 2.Sara Koe PSP Research Centre, Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders, Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.Dementia Research Centre, Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
  5. 5.Victor Horsley Department of NeurosurgeryNational Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryLondonUK

Personalised recommendations