Global functional connectivity reveals highly significant differences between the vegetative and the minimally conscious state
- 822 Downloads
A major challenge in the diagnosis of disorders of consciousness is the differential diagnosis between the vegetative state (VS) and the minimally conscious state (MCS). Clinically, VS is defined by complete unawareness, whereas MCS is defined by the presence of inconsistent but clearly discernible behavioural signs of consciousness. In healthy individuals, pain cries have been reported to elicit functional activation within the pain matrix of the brain, which may be interpreted as empathic reaction. In this study, pain cries were presented to six VS patients, six MCS patients, and 17 age-matched healthy controls. Conventional task-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) showed no significant differences in functional activation between the VS and MCS groups. In contrast to this negative finding, the application of a novel data-driven technique for the analysis of the brain’s global functional connectivity yielded a positive result. The weighted global connectivity (WGC) was significantly greater in the MCS group compared to the VS group (p < 0.05, family-wise error corrected). Using areas of significant WGC differences as ‘seed regions’ in a secondary connectivity analysis revealed extended functional networks in both MCS and healthy groups, whereas no such long-range functional connections were observed in the VS group. These results demonstrate the potential of functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) as a clinical tool for differential diagnosis in disorders of consciousness.
KeywordsTraumatic brain injury Anoxic brain injury Coma Consciousness Functional connectivity Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome
CS would like to thank the Chief Scientist Office of Scotland for partly funding this research. SM and CS acknowledge the support of the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) through the SINAPSE initiative (Scottish Imaging Network: A Platform for Scientific Excellence; http://www.sinapse.ac.uk). BK, SL, AM, FM and TY were supported by the German Research Society (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG). In addition BK acknowledges the support from the European Union (Grant DECODER).
Ethics standard statement
The study was approved by the local ethics committee.
Conflicts of Interest
- 3.Baars BJ (1988) A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- 8.Boly M, Faymonville ME, Peigneux P, Lambermont B, Damas P, Del Fiore G, Degueldre C, Franck G, Luxen A, Lamy M, Moonen G, Maquet P, Laureys S (2004) Auditory processing in severely brain injured patients: differences between the minimally conscious state and the persistent vegetative state. Arch Neurol 61:233–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Boly M, Tshibanda L, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhomme Q, Schnakers C, Ledoux D, Boveroux P, Garweg P, Lambernmont B, Phillips C, Luxen A, Moonen G, Bassetti C, Maquet P, Laureys S (2009) Functional connectivity in the default network during resting state is preserved in a vegetative but not in a brain dead patient. Hum Brain Mapp 30:2393–2400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Bradley MM, Lang PJ (1999). International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical report B-2: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
- 16.Damasio AR (1999) The feeling of what happens: body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt, San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kotchoubey B (2009). Vegetative state. In: Squire L (ed) Encyclopedia of neuroscience, vol 10. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 61–66Google Scholar
- 23.Kotchoubey B, Yu T, Markl A, Vogel D, Müller F, Lang S (2011) On the way to the deep layers of consciousness. Adv Clin Neurosci Rehabil 11:10–13Google Scholar
- 37.Sander K, Frome Y, Scheich H (2007) FMRI activations of amygdala, cingulate cortex, and auditory cortex by infant laughing and crying. Hum Brain Mapp 18:1007–1022Google Scholar
- 38.Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, Ventura M, Boly M, Majerus S, Moonen G, Laureys S (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurology 9, Article 35Google Scholar