Characterization of cognitive and motor performance during dual-tasking in healthy older adults and patients with Parkinson’s disease
- 1.1k Downloads
The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of dual-tasking on cognitive performance and gait parameters in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) without dementia. The impact of cognitive task complexity on cognition and walking was also examined. Eighteen patients with PD (ages 53–88, 10 women; Hoehn and Yahr stage I-II) and 18 older adults (ages 61–84; 10 women) completed two neuropsychological measures of executive function/attention (the Stroop Test and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test). Cognitive performance and gait parameters related to functional mobility of stride were measured under single (cognitive task only) and dual-task (cognitive task during walking) conditions with different levels of difficulty and different types of stimuli. In addition, dual-task cognitive costs were calculated. Although cognitive performance showed no significant difference between controls and PD patients during single or dual-tasking conditions, only the patients had a decrease in cognitive performance during walking. Gait parameters of patients differed significantly from controls at single and dual-task conditions, indicating that patients gave priority to gait while cognitive performance suffered. Dual-task cognitive costs of patients increased with task complexity, reaching significantly higher values then controls in the arithmetic task, which was correlated with scores on executive function/attention (Stroop Color-Word Page). Baseline motor functioning and task executive/attentional load affect the performance of cognitive tasks of PD patients while walking. These findings provide insight into the functional strategies used by PD patients in the initial phases of the disease to manage dual-task interference.
KeywordsParkinson’s disease Dual-task Cognition Gait
This research was supported by the National Institute for Translational Medicine (INCT-TM). I. I. Argimon is a National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) research fellow. D. B. Lima is a CAPES Ministry of Education and Culture fellowship and H. B. Oliveira is a FAPERGS fellowship.
Conflicts of interest
The authors also declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.Rochester L, Hetherington V, Jones D, Nieuwboer A, Willems AM, Kwakkel G et al (2004) Attending to the task: interference effects of functional tasks on walking in Parkinson’s disease and the roles of cognition, depression, fatigue, and balance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:1578–1585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Gorestein C, Andrade L (1998) Inventário de depressão de Beck: propriedades psicométricas da versão em português. Rev Psiquiatr Clín 25:245–250Google Scholar
- 16.Fahn S, Elton RL, Members of the UPDRS Development Committee (1987) The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB, Goldstein M (eds) Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. Macmillan Healthcare Information, Florham Park pp 153–163, 293–304Google Scholar
- 17.Kongs SK, Thompson LL, Iverson GL, Heaton RK (2000) Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 Card Version. Psychological Assessment Resources, LutzGoogle Scholar
- 18.Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O (2006) A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms and commentary. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 23.Paolo AM, Tröster AI, Axelrod BN, Koller WC (1995) Construct validity of the WCST in normal elderly and persons with Parkinson’s disease. Arch Clin Neuropsych 10:463–473Google Scholar
- 32.Hausdorff JM (2005) Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2(19)Google Scholar
- 56.Brauer SG, Woollacott MH, Lamont R, Clewett S, O’Sullivan J, Silburn P, Mellick GD, Morris ME (2011) Single and dual task gait training in people with Parkinson’s disease: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Neurol 11(90)Google Scholar