Management of right-to-left shunt in cryptogenic cerebrovascular disease: results from the observational Austrian paradoxical cerebral embolism trial (TACET) registry
- 366 Downloads
Paradoxical embolism due to a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a possible cause of ischemic stroke, particularly in young cryptogenic stroke patients. In most cases, however, it is difficult to establish a firm etiological association and the debate about management is ongoing. The Austrian Paradoxical Cerebral Embolism Trial was designed as a prospective, national, multi-center, non-randomized registry to add further data on this topic before the completion of randomized controlled trials. Over 27 months 188 cryptogenic stroke/TIA patients ≤55 years were entered by 15 Austrian stroke units. Contrast transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated a cardiac right-to-left shunt (RLS) in 176 patients; a pulmonary RLS was assumed in 10, and 2 showed both. Ninety-seven (55 %) patients with cardiac RLS underwent interventional treatment, and this was more likely for patients with stroke as index event, a symptomatic infarction on MRI and a large size of PFO. Over 2 years, recurrences occurred at a rate of approximately 1.3 % for stroke and 4.3 % for TIA, and were especially frequent in patients with pulmonary RLS. When comparing outcomes in patients with cardiac RLS there was a trend for fewer recurrences with interventional management (closure: four TIA in four patients vs. medical: three strokes and seven TIA in nine patients; p = 0.066 for events, p = 0.085 for patients). The complication rate was 13.4, and 5.7 % had residual shunting. The possible causes for paradoxical embolism in young patients with cryptogenic stroke appear more variable than usually considered, and other causes than PFO should not be neglected. Interventional treatment of a cardiac RLS may offer a small benefit, but has to be weighed against possible complications and the problem of establishing causality.
KeywordsParadoxical cerebral embolism Cryptogenic stroke Patent foramen ovale Right-to-left shunt Pulmonary arteriovenous malformation Transcatheter closure
The study was financially supported by the Austrian Society of Stroke Research.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.
- 5.Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, Albers GW, Bush RL, Fagan SC, Halperin JL, Johnston SC, Katzan I, Kernan WN, Mitchell PH, Ovbiagele B, Palesch YY, Sacco RL, Schwamm LH, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Turan TN (2011) American heart association stroke council, council on cardiovascular nursing, council on clinical cardiology, and interdisciplinary council on quality of care and outcomes research. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke 42(1):227–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Goldstein LB, Adams R, Alberts MJ, Appel LJ, Brass LM, Bushnell CD, Culebras A, DeGraba TJ, Gorelick PB, Guyton JR, Hart RG, Howard G, Kelly-Hayes M, Nixon JV (2006) American heart association; American stroke association stroke council. Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American heart association/American stroke association stroke council: cosponsored by the atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease interdisciplinary working group; cardiovascular nursing council; clinical cardiology council; nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism council; and the quality of care and outcomes research interdisciplinary working group. Circulation 113(24):e873–e923PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Mono ML, Geister L, Galimanis A, Jung S, Praz F, Arnold M, Fischer U, Wolff S, Findling O, Windecker S, Wahl A, Meier B, Mattle HP, Nedeltchev K (2011) Patent foramen ovale may be causal for the first stroke but unrelated to subsequent ischemic events. Stroke (Epub a head)Google Scholar
- 20.Mas JL, Zuber M (1995) Recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both and cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack. French study group on patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysm. Am Heart J 130(5):1083–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Bertolini A, Pezzini A, Padovani A, Caso V, Venti M, Alberti A, Palmiero RA, Cerrato P, Silvestrelli G, Lanari A, Previdi P, Corea F, Balducci A, Ferri R, Falcinelli F, Filippucci E, Chiocchi P, Grandi FC, Ferigo L, Musolino R, Bersano A, Ghione I, Sacco S, Carolei A, Baldi A (2011) FORI (foramen ovale registro Italiano) investigators. Risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack and patent foramen ovale: the FORI (foramen ovale registro Italiano) study. Cerebrovasc Dis 31(2):109–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar