Journal of Neurology

, Volume 260, Issue 1, pp 105–114 | Cite as

Long-term duodenal levodopa infusion in Parkinson’s disease: a 3-year motor and cognitive follow-up study

  • Maurizio Zibetti
  • Aristide Merola
  • Valeria Ricchi
  • Alice Marchisio
  • Carlo Alberto Artusi
  • Laura Rizzi
  • Elisa Montanaro
  • Dario Reggio
  • Claudio De Angelis
  • Mario Rizzone
  • Leonardo Lopiano
Original Communication

Abstract

Duodenal infusion of levodopa/carbidopa gel (Duodopa) is an effective treatment option for advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Long-term clinical experience up to 16 years suggests that the safety of this procedure is acceptable, while several observational studies showed that Duodopa reduces motor fluctuations and dyskinesias improving patients’ quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term motor and cognitive outcome of Duodopa treatment in advanced PD patients and its’ impact on the QoL. Twenty-five consecutive PD patients were assessed using the Unified PD rating scale (UPDRS), a battery of neuropsychological tests, and the PD questionnaire (PDQ-39) at baseline and after a mean period of three years of Duodopa treatment. Seventeen out of 25 patients reached the follow-up evaluation; five patients discontinued Duodopa and three patients died of causes unrelated to drug infusion. Duodopa improved motor complications (UPDRS-IV) and quality of life (PDQ-39). A sub-group of subjects (41 %) developed a significant deterioration of cognitive functions over time. The most common adverse events were dislocation and the kinking of the intestinal tube. In conclusion, Duodopa therapy is effective in the long-term treatment of advanced PD patients. Continuous enteral levodopa infusion achieves a reduction of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias improving patients’ QoL, despite the progression of PD motor symptoms and a significant decline in cognitive functions in a sub-group of patients.

Keywords

Parkinson’s disease Levodopa/carbidopa duodenal infusion Motor fluctuations Dyskinesias 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

The study has been approved by the San Giovanni Battista Molinette Hospital ethics committee and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

References

  1. 1.
    Fernandez HH, Odin P (2011) Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel for treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease. Curr Med Res Opin 27:907–919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nilsson D, Nyholm D, Aquilonius SM (2001) Duodenal levodopa infusion in Parkinson’s disease—long-term experience. Acta Neurol Scand 104:343–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kurth MC, Tetrud JW, Tanner CM et al (1993) Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of duodenal infusion of levodopa/carbidopa in Parkinson’s disease patients with ‘on–off’ fluctuations. Neurology 43:1698–1703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nyholm D, Askmark H, Gomes-Trolin C et al (2003) Optimizing levodopa pharmacokinetics: intestinal infusion versus oral sustained-release tablets. Clin Neuropharmacol 26:156–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nyholm D, Nilsson Remahl AI, Dizdar N et al (2005) Duodenal levodopa infusion monotherapy vs oral polypharmacy in advanced Parkinson disease. Neurology 64:216–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Antonini A, Isaias IU, Canesi M et al (2007) Duodenal levodopa infusion for advanced Parkinson’s disease: 12-month treatment outcome. Mov Disord 22:1145–1149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Antonini A, Mancini F, Canesi M, Zangaglia R, Isaias IU, Manfredi L, Pacchetti C, Zibetti M, Natuzzi F, Lopiano L, Nappi G, Pezzoli G (2008) Duodenal levodopa infusion improves quality of life in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Neurodegener Dis 5:244–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eggert K, Schrader C, Hahn M et al (2008) Continuous jejunal levodopa infusion in patients with advanced Parkinson disease: practical aspects and outcome of motor and non-motor complications. Clin Neuropharmacol 31:151–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Puente V, De Fabregues O, Oliveras C et al (2010) Eighteen month study of continuous intraduodenal levodopa infusion in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease: impact on control of fluctuations and quality of life. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 16:218–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Santos-García D, Sanjurjo LF, Macías M, Llaneza M, Carpintero P, de la Fuente-Fernández R (2012) Long-term exposure to duodenal levodopa/carbidopa infusion therapy improves quality of life in relation especially to mobility, activities of daily living, and emotional well-being. Acta Neurol Scand 125:187–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fasano A, Ricciardi L, Lena F, Bentivoglio AR, Modugno N (2012) Intrajejunal levodopa infusion in advanced Parkinson’s disease: long-term effects on motor and non-motor symptoms and impact on patient’s and caregiver’s quality of life. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 16:79–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Honig H, Antonini A, Martinez-Martin P, Forgacs I, Faye GC, Fox T, Fox K, Mancini F, Canesi M, Odin P, Chaudhuri KR (2009) Intrajejunal levodopa infusion in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot multicenter study of effects on nonmotor symptoms and quality of life. Mov Disord 24:1468–1474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Devos D, French DUODOPA Study Group (2009) Patient profile, indications, efficacy and safety of duodenal levodopa infusion in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 24:993–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nyholm D, Lewander T, Johansson A et al (2008) Enteral levodopa/carbidopa infusion in advanced Parkinson disease: long-term exposure. Clin Neuropharmacol 31:63–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nyholm D, Klangemo K, Johansson A (2012) Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion long-term therapy in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03679.x Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ (1992) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:181–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Emre M, Aarsland D, Brown R et al (2007) Clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 22:1689–1707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nilsson D, Hansson LE, Johansson K, Nyström C, Paalzow L, Aquilonius SM (2008) Long-term intraduodenal infusion of a water based levodopa–carbidopa dispersion in very advanced Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand 97:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tomlinson CL, Stowe R, Patel S, Rick C, Gray R, Clarke CE (2010) Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 25:2649–2653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perozzo P, Rizzone M, Bergamasco B et al (2001) Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease: comparison of pre- and postoperative neuropsychological evaluation. J Neurol Sci 192:9–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raven JC (ed) (1962) Coloured progressive matrices. Lewin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e Taratura italiana di Test Neuropsicologici. Italian J Neurol Sci 6:23–24Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G, MDB Group (1996) The Mental Deterioratum Battery: normative data, diagnostic reliability and qualitative analyses of cognitive impairment. Eur Neurol 36:378–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Giovagnoli AR, Del Pesce M, Mascheroni S, Simoncelli M, Laiacona M, Capitani E (1996) Trail making test: normative values from 287 normal adult controls. Italian J Neurol Sci 17:305–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B (2000) The FAB. A frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology 55:1621–1626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Freedman M, Leach L, Kaplan E, Winocur G, Shulman KJ, Delis DC (1994) Clock drawing. A neuropsichological analysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zappalà G, Measso G, Cavarzean F, Grigoletto F, Lebowitz B, Pirozzolo F, Amaducci L, Massari D, Crook T (1995) Aging and memory: corrections for age, sex and education for three widely used memory tests. Italian J Neurol Sci 16:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Caviness JN, Driver-Dunckley E, Connor DJ, Sabbagh MN, Hentz JG, Noble B, Evidente VG, Shill HA, Adler CH (2007) Defining mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 22:1272–1277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Peto V, Greenhall R, Hyman N (1997) The Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): development and validation of a Parkinson’s disease summary index score. Age Ageing 26:353–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Levy G, Schupf N, Tang MX et al (2002) Combined effect of age and severity on the risk of dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 51:722–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Foltynie T, Brayne C, Barker RA (2002) The heterogeneity of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 249:138–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen JP et al (2006) The rate of cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 61:1906–1911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Burn DJ, Rowan EN, Allan LM, Molloy S, O’Brien JT, McKeith IG (2006) Motor subtype and cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease, Parkinson’s disease with dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:585–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurizio Zibetti
    • 1
  • Aristide Merola
    • 1
  • Valeria Ricchi
    • 1
  • Alice Marchisio
    • 1
  • Carlo Alberto Artusi
    • 1
  • Laura Rizzi
    • 1
  • Elisa Montanaro
    • 1
  • Dario Reggio
    • 2
  • Claudio De Angelis
    • 2
  • Mario Rizzone
    • 1
  • Leonardo Lopiano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeuroscienceUniversity of TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.Division of Endoscopy, San Giovanni BattistaMolinette Hospital of TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations