Inpatient treatment of functional motor symptoms: a long-term follow-up study
- 581 Downloads
Functional neurological disorders are common, disabling and often difficult to treat. There is little consensus on the best approach to management. Multidisciplinary inpatient approaches are employed in some centres for patients with severe refractory symptoms, but their efficacy and, in particular, long-term outcomes are uncertain. We conducted a study using questionnaires completed retrospectively by patients treated at a specialised multidisciplinary inpatient programme at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery. Consecutive patients with functional motor symptoms admitted to this centre between 2006 and 2008 were invited to participate. Questionnaires were sent at least 2 years after discharge. We contacted 32 patients, and 26 responded. The majority had symptoms for at least 3 years prior to admission; 58 % of patients reported benefit from the programme on discharge. This self-reported benefit to symptoms and function was after a 2-year follow-up period in the majority of patients, but return to work or cessation of health-related financial benefits was uncommon even in those who improved. Seventy-four percent of those questioned stated they would recommend the programme to others with similar symptoms. Attribution of symptoms to stress or emotional state was correlated with favourable outcome. Our data suggest that multidisciplinary inpatient treatment for patients with refractory functional motor symptoms provides self-reported benefit in the long-term. Prospective analysis of such interventions and the determinants of benefit need assessment in order to improve the service and target treatment to patients most likely to benefit.
KeywordsPsychogenic Neurological Rehabilitation
TAS is funded by a Doctoral Research Fellowship awarded by the National Institute for Health Research. MJE is funded by a Clinician Scientist Fellowship awarded by the National Institute for Health Research. PK is funded by Parkinson’s UK.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Czarnecki K, Thompson JM, Seime R, Geda YE, Duffy JR, Ahlskog JE (2011) Functional movement disorders: successful treatment with a physical therapy rehabilitation protocol. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 38:311–316Google Scholar
- 5.Jankovic J, Cloninger CR, Fahn S, Hallett M, Lang AE, Williams DT (2005) Therapeutic approaches to psychogenic movement disorders. In: Hallett M, Fahn S, Jankovic J, Lang AE, Cloninger CR, Yudofsky SC (eds) Psychogenic movement disorders: neurology and neuropsychiatry (board review series). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, USA, pp 323–328Google Scholar
- 13.Sharpe M, Stone J, Hibberd C, Warlow C, Duncan R, Coleman R, Roberts R, Cull R, Pelosi A, Cavanagh J, Matthews K, Goldbeck R, Smyth R, Walker A, Walker J, MacMahon A, Murray G, Carson A (2010) Neurology out-patients with symptoms unexplained by disease: illness beliefs and financial benefits predict 1 year outcome. Psychol Med 40:689–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Stone J, Carson A, Duncan R, Roberts R, Warlow C, Hibberd C, Coleman R, Cull R, Murray G, Pelosi A, Cavanagh J, Matthews K, Goldbeck R, Smyth R, Walker J, Sharpe M (2010) Who is referred to neurology clinics? The diagnoses made in 3781 new patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 112:747–751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar