Advertisement

Journal of Neurology

, Volume 259, Issue 7, pp 1426–1432 | Cite as

Clinical applications of susceptibility weighted imaging in patients with major stroke

  • Poyin Huang
  • Chun-Hung Chen
  • Wei-Chen Lin
  • Ruey-Tay Lin
  • Gim-Thean Khor
  • Ching-Kuan Liu
Original Communication

Abstract

Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) is a newly developed magnetic resonance (MR) protocol. Recent studies have found that SWI may be useful in the field of cerebrovascular diseases, especially for detecting the presence of prominent veins, microbleeds and the susceptibility vessel sign (SVS). Some authors have even suggested that SWI can be used to predict outcome. We conducted a prospective study of patients hospitalized with middle cerebral artery territory infarction receiving MRI within 2 days of stroke onset. The presence of prominent veins, microbleeds and SVS in SWI was analyzed along with hospital characteristics of the patients. A total of 44 patients were enrolled. Among the 44 patients, 15 (34.1%) patients showed prominent veins, 19 (43.2%) showed SVS, and 14 (31.8%) showed microbleeds. The presence of SVS and prominent veins was not associated with prognosis. Though not statistically significant (p = 0.06), patients with SVS were more likely to develop later brain edema. SVS was significantly associated with arterial occlusion (p = 0.008) based on the MR angiogram, and microbleeds were significantly associated with later hemorrhagic transformation (p = 0.018). In our study, SWI could not be used to predict outcome as previously suggested. However, the presence of microbleeds may predict further hemorrhagic transformation, and the presence of SVS could be used to detect intra-arterial thrombus. Patients with SVS were also more likely to develop later brain edema. Including SWI in routine MR protocols for major acute ischemic stroke would be worthwhile.

Keywords

Susceptibility weighted imaging Stroke 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was partially supported by a grant from the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital-KMUH96-6G-33.

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Tsui YK, Tsai FY, Hasso AN, Greensite F, Nguyen BV (2009) Susceptibility-weighted imaging for differential diagnosis of cerebral vascular pathology: a pictorial review. J Neurol Sci 287(1–2):7–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kesavadas C, Santhosh K, Thomas B et al (2009) Signal changes in cortical laminar necrosis-evidence from susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroradiology 51(5):293–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, Haacke EM (2009) Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 2. Am J Neuroradiol 30(2):232–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Santhosh K, Kesavadas C, Thomas B et al (2009) Susceptibility weighted imaging: a new tool in magnetic resonance imaging of stroke. Clin Radiol 64(1):74–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang P, Lin WC, Huang PK, Khor GT (2009) Susceptibility weighted imaging in a patient with paroxysmal sympathetic storms. J Neurol 256(2):276–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hermier M, Nighoghossian N (2004) Contribution of susceptibility-weighted imaging to acute stroke assessment. Stroke 35(8):1989–1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Viallon M, Altrichter S, Pereira VM et al (2010) Combined use of pulsed arterial spin-labeling and susceptibility-weighted imaging in stroke at 3T. Eur Neurol 64(5):286–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kesavadas C, Thomas B, Pendharakar H, Sylaja PN (2011) Susceptibility weighted imaging: does it give information similar to perfusion weighted imaging in acute stroke? J Neurol 258(5):932–934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rovira A, Orellana P, Alvarez-Sabín J et al (2004) Hyperacute ischemic stroke: middle cerebral artery susceptibility sign at echo-planar gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 232(2):466–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schellinger P, Fiebach JB, Hacke W (2003) Imaging-based decision making in thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke. Present status. Stroke 34:575–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hermier M, Nighoghossian N, Derex L et al (2003) Hypointense transcerebral veins at T2*-weighted MRI: a marker of hemorrhagic transformation risk in patients treated by intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 23:1362–1370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YC et al (2004) Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 52:612–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reichenbach JR, Venkatesan R, Schillinger DJ et al (1997) Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent. Radiology 204:272–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rauscher A, Sedlacik J, Barth M et al (2005) Magnetic susceptibility-weighted MR phase imaging of the human brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:736–742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tong KA, Ashwal S, Holshouser BA et al (2003) Hemorrhagic shearing lesions in children and adolescents with posttraumatic diffuse axonal injury: improved detection and initial results. Radiology 227:332–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thamburaj K, Radhakrishnan VV, Thomas B et al (2008) Intratumoral microhemorrhages on T2*-weighted gradient-echo imaging helps differentiate vestibular schwannoma from meningioma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(3):552–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomas B, Somasundaram S, Thamburaj K et al (2008) Clinical applications of susceptibility weighted MR imaging of the brain d a pictorial review. Neuroradiology 50:105–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tan IL, van Schijndel RA, Pouwels PJ et al (2000) MR venography of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1039–1042PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flacke S, Urbach H, Keller E et al (2000) Middle cerebral artery (MCA) susceptibility sign at susceptibility-based perfusion MR imaging: clinical importance and comparison with hyperdense MCA sign at CT. Radiology 215:476–482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moulin T, Crepin Leblond T, Chopard JL et al (1993) Hemorrhagic infarcts. Eur Neurol 34:64–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kidwell CS, Saver JL, Villablanca JP et al (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging detection of microbleeds before thrombolysis: an emerging application. Stroke 33:95–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Roob G et al (1999) Histopathologic analysis of foci of signal loss on gradient-echo T2*-weighted MR images in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: evidence of microangiopathy-related microbleeds. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:637–642PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Poyin Huang
    • 1
  • Chun-Hung Chen
    • 1
  • Wei-Chen Lin
    • 2
  • Ruey-Tay Lin
    • 1
  • Gim-Thean Khor
    • 1
  • Ching-Kuan Liu
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyKaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyKaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyKaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang HospitalKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations