Journal of Neurology

, Volume 257, Issue 3, pp 436–438 | Cite as

Beevor’s sign in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: an old sign with new implications

  • Katharina Eger
  • Berit Jordan
  • Sylvia Habermann
  • Stephan Zierz
Original Communication


Beevor’s sign, an upward deflection of the umbilicus on flexion of the neck, is the result of paralysis of the inferior portion of the rectus abdominis muscle, so that the upper fibers predominate, pulling the umbilicus upwards. The condition may be caused by spinal cord injury at or below the level of Th10. It has also been observed in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). Positive Beevor’s sign has been described as a sign of more than 90% sensitivity and specificity with regard to diagnosis of FSHD. We investigated 28 patients with FSHD, proven by genetic analysis, and 65 non-FSHD patients with other neuromuscular diseases. In 13 patients classical FSHD phenotype was observed, in 15 patients phenotype was atypical. Beevor’s sign was positive in 15 out of 28 FSHD patients as well as in two of the 65 non-FSHD patients. In patients with typical FSHD phenotype, Beevor’s sign was positive in 11/13. Only 4/15 patients with atypical FSHD phenotype showed Beevor’s sign. Beevor’s sign is less frequent in patients with atypical phenotype. Although Beevor’s sign is significantly more frequent in FSHD patients than in patients with other neuromuscular diseases, Beevor’s sign is not as sensitive as previously reported. However, especially in atypical cases, Beevor’s sign might help in the diagnosis of FSHD.


Facioscapulouhmeral muscular dystrophy FSHD Beevor’s sign 


  1. 1.
    Awerbuch GI, Nigro MA, Wishnow R (1990) Beevor’s sign and facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Arch Neurol 47:1208–1209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiodo A, Ho S (2005) Umbilical movement after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 28:255–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krasnianski M, Eger K, Neudecker S et al (2003) Atypical phenotypes in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 4q35 deletion. Arch Neurol 60:1421–1425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leon-Sarmiento FE, Bayona EA, Bayona-Prieto J (2007) A sudden Beevor’s sign. Clin Med Res 5:121–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pearce JM (2005) Beevor’s sign. Eur Neurol 53:208–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shahrizaila N, Wills AJ (2005) Significance of Beevor’s sign in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy and other neuromuscular diseases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:869–870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tashiro K (2001) Charles Edward Beevor (1854–1908). J Neurol 248:635–636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharina Eger
    • 1
  • Berit Jordan
    • 1
  • Sylvia Habermann
    • 1
  • Stephan Zierz
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurologische Klinik und PoliklinikUniversitätsklinikum Halle, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-WittenbergHalle/SaaleGermany

Personalised recommendations