Journal of Neurology

, Volume 256, Issue 5, pp 726–733 | Cite as

Eye-movement training-induced plasticity in patients with post-stroke hemianopia

  • Gereon Nelles
  • Anja Pscherer
  • Armin de Greiff
  • Michael Forsting
  • Horst Gerhard
  • Joachim Esser
  • H. Christoph Diener
Original Communication


Substantial disability in patients with hemianopia results from reduced visual perception. Previous studies have shown that these patients have impaired saccades. Improving exploratory eye movements with appropriate training of saccades may help to partially compensate for the visuoperceptive impairment during daily life activities. The changes in cortical control of eye movements that may be induced by these training strategies, however, are not known. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study the training effects of eye-movement training on cortical control of saccades. Brain activation during visually guided saccades was measured in eight patients with an occipital cortical lesion causing homonymous hemianopia. Starting 8 weeks after the stroke, patients received 4 weeks of visual field training. The fMRI measurements were performed at baseline and after training. In five patients, follow-up fMRI was performed 4 weeks after the end of training. Differences in activation between rest and saccades as well as before and after training were assessed with statistical parametric mapping software (SPM’99). Twelve healthy subjects were scanned twice at a 4-week interval. In patients, significant activation at baseline was found in the frontal and parietal eye fields (FEF and PEF, respectively) bilaterally and in the supplementary eye field (SEF). Immediately after training, an area of increased activation was found in the left extrastriate cortex of the affected hemisphere. At follow-up, relatively more activation was found in the right peristriate cortex and in the SEF of the unaffected side. A relative decrease of activation was found in the left FEF. In this group of patients, eye-movement training induced altered brain activation in the striate and extrastriate cortex as well as in oculomotor areas.


Eye movement Functional magnetic resonance imaging Hemianopia Rehabilitation Saccades Stroke Visual field deficit 



Anterior posterior commissural line


Frontal eye fields


Posterior cerebral artery


Parietal eye field


Supplementary eye fields


Statistical parametric mapping



Supported by “Interne Forschungsförderung der Universität Essen, IFORES”.


  1. 1.
    Zihl J (1995) Visual scanning behavior in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 33:287–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kasten E, Wust S, Behrens-Baumann W, Sabel BA (1998) Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness. Nat Med 4:1083–1087PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kasten E, Bunzenthal U, Sabel BA (2006) Visual field recovery after vision restoration therapy (VRT) is independent of eye movements: an eye tracker study. Behav Brain Res 175:18–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kerkhoff G, Munssinger U, Meier EK (1994) Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness. Arch Neurol 51:474–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolognini N, Rasi F, Coccia M, Ladavas E (2005) Visual search improvement in hemianopic patients after audio–visual stimulation. Brain 128:2830–2842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poggel DA, Kasten E, Sabel BA (2004) Attentional cueing improves vision restoration therapy in patients with visual field defects. Neurology 63:2069–2076PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nelles G, Esser J, Eckstein A, Tiede A, Gerhard H, Diener H (2001) Compensatory visual field training in recovery from hemianopia after stroke. Neurosci Lett 306:189–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Rivaud S, Gaymard B, Muri R, Vermersch AI (1995) Cortical control of saccades. Ann Neurol 37:557–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bodis-Wollner I, Bucher SF, Seelos KC, Paulus W, Reiser M, Oertel WH (1997) Functional MRI mapping of occipital and frontal cortical activity during voluntary and imagined saccades. Neurology 49:416–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nelles G, de Greiff A, Pscherer A, Stude P, Forsting M, Hufnagel A, Gerhard H, Esser J, Diener HC (2007) Saccade induced cortical activation in patients with post-stroke visual field defects. J Neurol 254:1244–1252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kinsbourne M (1974) Lateral interactions in the brain. In: Kinsbourne M, Smith WL (eds) Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function. C.C. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Albert ML (1973) A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 23:658–664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heilmann KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E (1992) Neglect and related disorder. In: Heilmann KM, Valenstein E (eds) Clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frackowiak R, Friston K, Frith C, Dolan R, Mazziotta J (1997) Human brain function. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Price CJ, Buchel C, Worsley KJ (1999) Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage 10:385–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Coplanar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Thieme Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anderson TJ, Jenkins IH, Brooks DJ, Hawken MB, Frackowiak RS, Kennard C (1994) Cortical control of saccades and fixation in man. A PET study. Brain 117:1073–1084PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luna B, Thulborn KR, Strojwas MH, McCurtain BJ, Berman RA, Genovese CR, Sweeney JA (1998) Dorsal cortical regions subserving visually guided saccades in humans: an fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 8:40–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bittar RG, Ptito M, Faubert J, Dumoulin SO, Ptito A (1999) Activation of the remaining hemisphere following stimulation of the blind hemifield in hemispherectomized subjects. Neuroimage 10:339–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nelles G, Widman G, de Greiff A, Meistrowitz A, Dimitrova A, Weber J, Forsting M, Esser J, Diener HC (2002) Brain representation of hemifield stimulation in poststroke visual field defects. Stroke 33:1286–1293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henriksson L, Raninen A, Näsänen R, Hyvärinen L, Vanni S (2007) Training-induced cortical representation of a hemianopic hemifield. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78:74–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Darian-Smith C, Gilbert CD (1994) Axonal sprouting accompanies functional reorganization in adult cat striate cortex. Nature 368:737–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tardif E, Clarke S (2002) Commissural connections of human superior colliculus. Neuroscience 111:363–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schoenfeld MA, Heinze HJ, Woldorff MG (2002) Unmasking motion-processing activity in human brain area V5/MT + mediated by pathways that bypass primary visual cortex. Neuroimage 17:769–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ffytche DH, Skidmore BD, Zeki S (1995) Motion-from-hue activates area V5 of human visual cortex. Proc Biol Sci 260:353–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu Y, Rouiller EM (1999) Mechanisms of recovery of dexterity following unilateral lesion of the sensorimotor cortex in adult monkeys. Exp Brain Res 128:149–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kimmig H, Greenlee MW, Gondan M, Schira M, Kassubek J, Mergner T (2001) Relationship between saccadic eye movements and cortical activity as measured by fMRI: quantitative and qualitative aspects. Exp Brain Res 141:184–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sommer MA, Tehovnik EJ (1997) Reversible inactivation of macaque frontal eye field. Exp Brain Res 116:229–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schiller PH, True SD, Conway JL (1980) Deficits in eye movements following frontal eye field and superior colliculus ablations. J Neurophysiol 44:1175–1189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marshall RS, Ferrera JJ, Barnes A, Xian Z, O’Brien KA, Chmayssani M, Hirsch J, Lazar RM (2008) Brain activity associated with stimulation therapy of the visual borderzone in hemianopic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22:136–144PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gereon Nelles
    • 1
    • 5
  • Anja Pscherer
    • 1
  • Armin de Greiff
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael Forsting
    • 1
    • 2
  • Horst Gerhard
    • 3
  • Joachim Esser
    • 1
    • 4
  • H. Christoph Diener
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurologische Klinik und PoliklinikUniversitätsklinikum EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und NeuroradiologieUniversitätsklinikum EssenEssenGermany
  3. 3.Neurologische Klinik Philippusstift gGmbH EssenEssenGermany
  4. 4.Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Abteilung für Erkrankungen des vorderen AugenabschnittesUniversitätsklinikum EssenEssenGermany
  5. 5.KölnGermany

Personalised recommendations