Journal of Neurology

, 256:450 | Cite as

Distal and proximal prehension is differentially affected by Parkinson‘s disease

The effect of conscious and subconscious load cues
ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION

Abstract

Prehension movements consist of distal (grasp) and proximal (reach, lift) components. The proximal lifting movements (achieved at the wrist) of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) are characterized by bradykinesia. With respect to the distal component, PD patients show pathologically high grip forces (generated by the fingers) and slowing of force development indicative of disturbed sensorimotor adjustments during prehension. Combining kinematic and force analyses of prehension movements, we investigated whether PD differentially affects the adjustments of the distal or proximal prehension components to current load conditions. First, PD patients (n = 12) and healthy, age-matched control subjects grasped and lifted light and heavy objects without any load cues. Then, they were presented with cues that indicated changes in object load. These load cues were either consciously perceived or rendered subconscious through use of the technique of metacontrast masking. Consistent with the functional organization of the basal ganglia, patients with PD could adapt distal prehension components (grip force) to current load conditions using both types of cues. However, they were impaired in adjusting proximal prehension components (lift velocity). While controls were able to normalize lift velocity with the help of both conscious and subconscious load cues, the PD patients could use neither form of cue, and retained a pathological overshoot in lift velocity. Our results demonstrate that visuomotor integration during prehension movements differs at distal and more proximal joints and that deficits in this integration are pronounced for the latter in Parkinson’s disease.

Key words

reach-to-grasp movement grip force bradykinesia visuo-motor transformation coordination 

References

  1. 1.
    Benecke R, Rothwell JC, Dick JPR, Day BL, Marsden CD (1987) Disturbance of sequential movements in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain 110:361–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castiello U (2005) The neuroscience of grasping. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dafotakis M, Fink GR, Allert N, Nowak DA (2008) The impact of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on bradykinesia of proximal and distal upper limb muscles in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 255:429–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DeLong MR, Georgopoulos AP, Crutcher MD, Mitchell SJ, Richardson RT, Alexander GE (1984) Functional organisation of the basal ganglia: contributions of sinle-cell recording studies. Ciba Foundation Symposium 107:64–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fahn S, Elton RL (1987) The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB, Goldstein M (eds) Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. Florham Park: Mac Millan, pp 153–163Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fellows SJ, Kronenbuerger M, Allert N, et al. (2006) The effect of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on precision grip abnormalities in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 12:149–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fellows SJ, Noth J (2004) Grip force abnormalities in de novo Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 19:560–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fellows SJ, Noth J, Schwarz M (1998) Precision grip and Parkinson’s disease. Brain 121:1771–1784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fellows SJ, Tabaza R, Heumann M, et al. (2002) Modification of a functional motor task by non-consciously perceived sensory stimuli. NeuroReport 13:637–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jeannerod M, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G, Sakata H (1995) Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends Neurosci 18:314–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeannerod M, Paulignan Y, Weiss PH (1998) Grasping an object: one movement, several components. Novartis Foundation Symposium 218:5–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johansson RS (1991) How is grasping modified by somatosensory input? In: Humphrey GK, Freund H-J (eds) Motor control: concepts and issues. Chichester: Wiley, pp 331–355Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johansson RS, Cole KJ (1994) Grasp stability during manipulative actions. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 72:511–524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klotz W, Neumann O (1999) Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance 25:976–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Negrotti A, Secchi C, Gentilucci M (2005) Effects of disease progresion and L-dopa therapy on the control of reaching-grasping in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 43:450–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Neumann O, Klotz W (1994) Motor response to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In: Umilta C, Moscovitch M (eds) Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, pp 123–150Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nowak DA, Topka H, Tisch S, Hariz M, Limousin P, Rothwell JC (2005) The beneficial effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation on manipulative finger force control in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol 193:427–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taha JM, Favre J, Baumann TK, Burchiel KJ (1996) Characteristics and somatotopic organisation of kinesthetic cells in the globus pallidus of patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosurg 85:1005–1012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weiss PH, Stelmach GE, Adler CH, Waterman C (1996) Parkinsonian arm movements as altered by task difficulty. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2:215–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weiss PH, Stelmach GE, Chaiken A, Adler CH (1999) Use of advance information for complex movements in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 5:19–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weiss PH, Stelmach GE, Hefter H (1997) Programming of a movement sequence in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 120(Pt 1):91–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wenzelburger R, Kopper F, Zhang B-R, et al. (2003) Subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson’s disease preferentially improves akinesia of proximal arm movements compared to finger movements. Mov Disord 18:1162–1169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. H. Weiss
    • 1
  • M. Dafotakis
    • 1
  • L. Metten
    • 2
  • J. Noth
    • 2
  1. 1.Cognitive Neurology Section, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3)Research Center JülichJülichGermany
  2. 2.Neurologische KlinikUniversitätsklinikum AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations