Journal of Neurology

, 255:1038 | Cite as

Clinical features and associated syndromes of mal de debarquement

  • Y.-H. Cha
  • J. Brodsky
  • G. Ishiyama
  • C. Sabatti
  • R. W. Baloh



To investigatethe clinical features and naturalhistory of mal de debarquement(MdD).


Retrospective casereview with follow-up questionnaireand telephone interviews.


University Neurotology Clinic.


Patients seen between1980 and 2006 who developed apersistent sensation of rocking orswaying for at least 3 days after exposureto passive motion.

Main outcome measure

Clinical features,diagnostic testing, and questionnaireresponses.


Of 64 patients(75 % women) identifiedwith MdD, 34 completed follow-upquestionnaires and interviews in2006. Most patients had normalneurological exams, ENGs andbrain MRIs. The average age of thefirst MdD episode was 39 ± 13years. A total of 206 episodes wereexperienced by 64 patients. Ofthese, 104 episodes (51 %) lasted> 1 month; 18 %, > 1 year; 15 %, > 2years; 12 %, > 4 years, and 11 %, > 5years. Eighteen patients (28 %) subsequentlydeveloped spontaneousepisodes of MdD-like symptomsafter the initial MdD episode.There was a much higher rate ofmigraine in patients who went onto develop spontaneous episodes(73 %) than in those who did not(22 %). Subsequent episodes werelonger than earlier ones in mostpatients who had multiple episodes.Re-exposure to passivemotion temporarily decreasedsymptoms in most patients (66 %).Subjective intolerance to visualmotion increased (10 % to 66 %)but self-motion sensitivity did not(37 % to 50 %) with onset of MdD.


The majority of MdDepisodes lasting longer than 3 daysresolve in less than one year but theprobability of resolution declineseach year. Many patients experiencemultiple MdD episodes. Somepatients develop spontaneousepisodes after the initial motiontriggeredepisode with migrainebeing a risk factor.

Key words

mal de debarquement vestibular adaptation motion sensitivity visual motion migraine 


  1. 1.
    Bles W, Vianney de Jong JM, de Wit G(1983) Compensation for labyrinthinedefects examined by use of a tiltingroom. Acta Otolaryngol 95:576–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Britton TC, Day BL, Brown P, RothwellJC, Thompson PD, Marsden CD (1993)Postural electromyographic responsesin the arm and leg following galvanicvestibular stimulation in man. ExpBrain Res 94:143–151Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown JJ, Baloh RW (1987) Persistentmal de debarquement: a motion inducedsubjective disorder of balance.Am J Otolaryngol 8:219–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flanagan MB, May JG, Dobie TG (2004)The role of vection, eye movementsand postural instability in the etiologyof motion sickness. J Vest Res 14:335–346Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gordon CR, Spitzer O, Doweck I,Melamed Y, Shupak A (1995) Clinicalfeatures of mal de debarquement: adaptationand habituation to sea conditions.J Vest Res 5:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gordon CR, Spitzer O, Shupak A,Doweck I (1992) Survey of mal dedebarquement BMJ 304:544PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hain TC, Hanna PA, Rheinberger MA(1999) Mal de Debarquement. ArchOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:615–620Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Headache Classification Subcommitteeof the International Headache Society(2004) The International Classificationof Headache Disorders 2nd edition.Cephalalgia 24(Suppl 1):1–160Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Irwin JA (1881) The pathology ofseasickness. Lancet 2:907–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jeka J, Oie K, Schoner G, Dijkstra T,Henson E (1998) Position and velocitycoupling of postural sway to somatosensorydrive. J Neurophysiol 79:1661–1674PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kavounoudias A, Roll R, Roll JP (2001)Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contributejointly to human erect postureregulation. J Physiol 532:869–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lewis RF (2004) Frequency-specificmal de debarquement. Neurology63:1983–1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M,Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF, AMPPAdvisory Group (2007) Migraine prevalence,disease burden, and the needfor preventive therapy. Neurology 68:343–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mair IWS (1996) The mal de debarquementsyndrome. J Audiol Med 5:21–25Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mergner T, Maurer C, Peterka RJ(2003) A multisensory posture controlmodel of human upright stance. ProgBrain Res 142:189–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moeller L, Lempert T (2007) Mal dedebarquement: pseudo-hallucinationsfrom vestibular memory? J Neurol 254:813–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peterka RJ, Benolken MS (1995) Roleof somatosensory and vestibular cuesin attenuating visually induced humanpostural sway. Exp Brain Res 105:101–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reason JT (1978) Motion sicknessadaptation: a neural mismatch model.Journal of the Royal Society ofMedicine 71:819–829Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y.-H. Cha
    • 1
  • J. Brodsky
    • 2
  • G. Ishiyama
    • 1
  • C. Sabatti
    • 3
  • R. W. Baloh
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of NeurologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of StatisticsUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Dept. of Human GeneticsUniversity of CaliforniaUCLA Hum GeneticsLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations