Journal of Neurology

, Volume 255, Issue 11, pp 1756–1761

The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) in Parkinson’s disease and correlations with formal measures of executive functioning

  • C. F. Lima
  • L. P. Meireles
  • R. Fonseca
  • S. L. Castro
  • C. Garrett
ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION

Abstract

Background

The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) is a short tool for the assessment of executive functions consisting of six subtests that explore different abilities related to the frontal lobes. Several studies have indicated that executive dysfunction is the main neuropsychological feature in Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Goals

To evaluate the clinical usefulness of the FAB in identifying executive dysfunction in PD; to determine if FAB scores in PD are correlated with formal measures of executive functions; and to provide normative data for the Portuguese version of the FAB.

Methods

The study involved 122 healthy participants and 50 idiopathic PD patients. We compared FAB scores in normal controls and in PD patients matched for age, education and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score. In PD patients, FAB results were compared to the performance on tests of executive functioning.

Results

In the healthy subjects, FAB scores varied as a function of age, education and MMSE. In PD, FAB scores were significantly decreased compared to normal controls, and correlated with measures of executive functions such as phonemic and semantic verbal fluency tests, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Trail Making Test Part A and Part B.

Conclusion

The FAB is a useful tool for the screening of executive dysfunction in PD, showing good discriminant and concurrent validities. Normative data provided for the Portuguese version of this test improve the accuracy and confidence in the clinical use of the FAB.

Key words

executive functions Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) Parkinson’s disease Portuguese norms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Appollonio I, Leone M, Isella V, Piamarta F, Consoli T, Villa M, Forapani E, Russo A, Nichelli P (2005) The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): Normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci 26:108–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baeta E (2002) Bateria para avaliação neuropsicológica de adultos com epilepsia (Battery for neuropsychological assessment of adults with epilepsy). Psicologia 16:79–96Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barkley RA (2001) The executive functions and self-regulation: An evolutionary neuropsychological perspective. Neuropsych Rev 11(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beato R, Nitrini R, Formigoni A, Caramelli P (2007) Brazilian version of the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): Preliminary data on administration to healthy elderly. Dement Neuropsychol 1:59–65Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burgess P (2003) Assessment of executive function. In: Halligan P, Kischka U, Marshall J (eds) Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 302–321Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calabresi P, Picconi B, Parnetti L, Di Filippo M (2006) A convergent model for cognitive dysfunctions in Parkinson’s disease: the critical dopamineacetylcholine synaptic balance. Lancet Neur 5:974–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dubois R, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B (2000) The FAB: A frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology 55:1621–1628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P (1975) Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psych Res 12:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Funahashi S (2000) Neuronal mechanisms of executive control by the prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Res 39:147–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grant D, Berg A (1993) Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. USA: Psychological Assessment Resources, IncGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guerreiro M, Silva AP, Botelho MA, Castro-Caldas A, Garcia C (2003) Avaliação Breve do Estado Mental (Brief assessment of mental state). In: Mendonça A, Garcia C, Guerreiro M (eds) Grupo de Estudos de Envelhecimento Cerebral e Demência: Escalas e Testes na Demência, pp 27–32Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heyder K, Suchan B, Daum I (2004) Cortico-subcortical contributions to executive control. Acta Psychologica 115:271–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Higginson C, King D, Levine D, Wheelock V, Khamphay N, Sigvardt K (2003) The relationship between executive function and verbal memory in Parkinson’s disease. Brain and Cognition 52:343–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 17(5):427–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lavarone A, Ronga B, Pellegrino L, Loré E, Vitaliano S, Galeone F, Carlomagno S (2004) The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): Normative data from an Italian sample and performance of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Func Neurol 19(3):191–195Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lezak M, Howieson D, Loring D (2004) Neuropsychological assessment (4th Edition). Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manchester D, Priestley N, Jackson H (2004) The assessment of executive functions: coming out of the office. Brain Injury 18(11):1067–1081CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morris R, Worsley C (2003) Neuropsychological presentation of Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. In: Halligan P, Kischka U, Marshall J (eds) Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 506–527Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oguro H, Yamaguchi S, Abe S, Ishida Y, Bokura H, Kobayashi S (2006) Differentiating Alzheimer’s disease from subcortical vascular dementia with the FAB test. J Neurol 253:1490–1494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paviour D, Winterburn D, Simmonds S, Burgess G, Wilkinson L, Fox N, Lees A, Jahanshahi M (2005) Can the frontal assessment battery (FAB) differentiate bradykinetic rigid syndromes? Relation of the FAB to formal neuropsychological testing. Neurocase 11:274–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Riedel O, Klotsche J, Spottke A, Deuschl G, Forstl H, Henn F, Heuser I, Oertel W, Reichmann H, Riederer P, Trenkwalder C, Dodel R, Wittchen H (2008) Cognitive impairment in 873 patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: Results from the German Study on Epidemiology of Parkinson’s Disease with Dementia (GEPAD). J Neurol 255(2):255–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rodriguez del Alamo A, Catalán Alonso MJ, Carrasco Marín L (2003) FAB: A preliminar Spanish application of the frontal assessment battery to 11 groups of patients. Rev Neurol 36(7):605–608Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Simões MR (2004) Matrizes Progressivas Coloridas de Raven. In: Almeida L, Simões MR, Machado C, Gonçalves M (eds) Instrumentos de avaliação psicológica validados para a população portuguesa (Psychological assessment tools validated for the Portuguese population). Editora Quarteto: Coimbra, pp 141–171 (Vol II)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stuss D, Alexander M (2000) Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A conceptual view. Psychol Res 63:289–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wechsler D (in press). Wechsler Memory Scale – Third Edition (WMS-III). Lisboa: Cegoc-TeaGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Worthington AD (2003) The natural recovery and treatment of executive disorders. In: Halligan P, Kischka U, Marshall J (eds) Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 322–339Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. F. Lima
    • 1
  • L. P. Meireles
    • 1
  • R. Fonseca
    • 2
  • S. L. Castro
    • 1
  • C. Garrett
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and EducationUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Dept. of Neurology, Hospital de S. JoãoFaculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations