Advertisement

Journal of Neurology

, Volume 253, Issue 1, pp 65–72 | Cite as

Effect of physical countermaneuvers on orthostatic hypotension in familial dysautonomia

  • M. Tutaj
  • H. Marthol
  • D. Berlin
  • C. M. Brown
  • F. B. Axelrod
  • M. J. Hilz
ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION

Abstract

Familial dysautonomia (FD) patients frequently experience debilitating orthostatic hypotension. Since physical countermaneuvers can increase blood pressure (BP) in other groups of patients with orthostatic hypotension, we evaluated the effectiveness of countermaneuvers in FD patients.

In 17 FD patients (26.4 ± 12.4 years, eight female), we monitored heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR) and calf volume while supine, during standing and during application of four countermaneuvers: bending forward, squatting, leg crossing, and abdominal compression using an inflatable belt. Countermaneuvers were initiated after standing up,when systolic BP had fallen by 40mmHg or diastolic BP by 30mmHg or presyncope had occurred.

During active standing, blood pressure and TPR decreased, calf volume increased but CO remained stable.Mean BP increased significantly during bending forward (by 20.0 (17 – 28.5) mmHg; P = 0.005) (median (25th – 75th quartile)), squatting (by 50.8 (33.5 – 56) mmHg; P = 0.002), and abdominal compression (by 5.8 (–1 – 34.7) mmHg; P = 0.04) – but not during leg–crossing. Squatting and abdominal compression also induced a significant increase in CO (by 18.1 (–1.3 – 47.9) % during squatting (P = 0.02) and by 7.6 (0.4 – 19.6) % during abdominal compression (P=0.014)). HR did not change significantly during the countermaneuvers. TPR increased significantly only during squatting (by 37.2 (11.8 – 48.2) %; P = 0.01). However, orthopedic problems or ataxia prevented several patients from performing some of the countermaneuvers. Additionally, many patients required assistance with the maneuvers.

Squatting, bending forward and abdominal compression can improve orthostatic BP in FD patients, which is achieved mainly by an increased cardiac output. Squatting has the greatest effect on orthostatic blood pressure in FD patients. Suitability and effectiveness of a specific countermaneuver depends on the orthopedic or neurological complications of each FD patient and must be individually tested before a therapeutic recommendation can be given.

Key words

physical maneuvers familial dysautonomia syncope autonomic failure impedance cardiography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Axelrod FB, Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Berlin D, Kopin IJ (1996) Pattern of plasma levels of catecholamines in familial dysautonomia. Clin Auton Res 6:205–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Axelrod FB, Hilz MJ (2000) Familial dysautonomia. In: Appenzeller O (ed) Handbook of Clinical Neurology. The Autonomic Nervous System. Part II – Dysfunctions. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 143–160 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Axelrod FB, Krey L, Glickstein JS, Allison JW, Friedman D (1995) Preliminary observations on the use of midodrine in treating orthostatic hypotension in familial dysautonomia. J Auton Nerv Syst 55:29–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernstein DP (1986) Continuous noninvasive real–time monitoring of stroke volume and cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance. Crit Care Medicine 14:898–901Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bouvette CM, McPhee BR, Opfer– Gehrking TL, Low PA (1996) Role of physical countermaneuvers in the management of orthostatic hypotension: efficacy and biofeedback augmentation. Mayo Clin Proc 71:847–853PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown CM, Hainsworth R (1999) Assessment of capillary fluid shifts during orthostatic stress in normal subjects and subjects with orthostatic intolerance. Clin Auton Res 9:69–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown CM, Stemper B, Welsch G, Brys M, Axelrod FB, Hilz MJ (2003) Orthostatic challenge reveals impaired vascular resistance control, but normal venous pooling and capillary filtration in familial dysautonomia. Clin Sci (Lond) 104:163–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cybulski G, Kozluk E, Michalak E, Niewiadomski W, Piatkowska A (2004) Holter–type impedance cardiography device. A system for continuous and non–invasive monitoring of cardiac haemodynamics. Kardiol Pol 61:138–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hanson P, Slane PR, Rueckert PA, Clark SV (1995) Squatting revisited: comparison of haemodynamic responses in normal individuals and heart transplantation recipients. Br Heart J 74:154–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krediet CTP, van Dijk N, Linzer M, van Lieshout JJ, Wieling W (2002) Management of Vasovagal Syncope. Controlling or Aborting Faints by Leg Crossing and Muscle Tensing. Circulation 106:1684–1689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O'Donnel TV, McIlroy MB (1962) The circulatory effects of squatting. Am Heart J 84:347–358Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rowell LB, Detry JM, Blackmon JR, Wyss C (1972) Importance of the splanchnic vascular bed in human blood pressure regulation. J Appl Physiol 32:213–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sato T, Nishinaga M, Kawamoto A, Ozawa T, Takatsuji H (1993) Accuracy of a continuous blood pressure monitor based on arterial tonometry. Hypertension 21:866–874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sharpey–Schafer EP (1956) Effects of squatting on the normal and failing circulation. BMJ 1:1072–1074Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Slaugenhaupt SA, Blumenfeld A, Gill SP, Leyne M, Mull J, Cuajungco MP, Liebert CB, Chadwick B, Idelson M, Reznik L, Robbins C, Makalowska I, Brownstein M, Krappmann D, Scheidereit C, Maayan C, Axelrod FB, Gusella JF (2001) Tissue–specific expression of a splicing mutation in the IKBKAP gene causes familial dysautonomia. Am J Hum Genet 68:598–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smit AA, Wieling W, Fujimura J, Denq JC, Opfer–Gehrking TL, Akarriou M, Karemaker JM, Low PA (2004) Use of lower abdominal compression to combat orthostatic hypotension in patients with autonomic dysfunction. Clin Auton Res 14:167–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stemper B, Axelrod FB, Marthol H, Brown CM, Brys M, Welsch G, Hilz MJ (2003) Terminal vessel hyperperfusion despite organ hypoperfusion in familial dysautonomia. Clin Sci (Lond) 105:295–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stemper B, Bernardi L, Axelrod FB, Welsch G, Passino C, Hilz MJ (2004) Sympathetic and parasympathetic baroreflex dysfunction in familial dysautonomia. Neurology 63:1427–1431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tanaka H, Yamaguchi H, Tamai H (1997) Treatment of orthostatic intolerance with inflatable abdominal band. Lancet 349:175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ten Harkel ADJ, van Lieshout JJ, Wieling W (1994) Effects of leg muscle pumping and tensing on orthostatic arterial pressure: a study in normal subjects and patients with autonomic failure. Clin Sci 87:553–558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    The Consensus Committee of the American Autonomic Society and the American Academy of Neurology (1996) Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, pure autonomic failure and multiple system atrophy. Neurology 46:1470Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    van Dijk N, de Bruin IG, Gisolf J, Bruin–Bon HA, Linzer M, van Lieshout JJ, Wieling W (2005) Hemodynamic effects of leg crossing and skeletal muscle tensing during free standing in patients with vasovagal syncope. J Appl Physiol 98:584–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wieling W, Lieshout JJ van, Leeuwen AM van (1993) Physical manoeuvres that reduce postural hypotension in autonomic failure. Clin Auton Res 3:57–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Tutaj
    • 2
    • 4
  • H. Marthol
    • 1
    • 4
  • D. Berlin
    • 4
  • C. M. Brown
    • 3
  • F. B. Axelrod
    • 4
  • M. J. Hilz
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyJagiellonian UniversityKrakowPoland
  3. 3.Division of PhysiologyUniversity of FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
  4. 4.Autonomic Diseases Laboratory, Department of NeurologyNew York University School of MedicineNew York, NY10016

Personalised recommendations