Alteration of cerebral perfusion in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus measured by 3D perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging
- 115 Downloads
It is controversial whether alteration of cerebral perfusion plays an important role in the pathophysiology of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and can help to predict the outcome after shunt surgery.
Materials and Methods
28 patients with suspected NPH were examined clinically (Homburg Hydrocephalus Scale, walking test, incontinence protocol) and by 3D dynamic susceptibility based perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (PWI–MRI) before and after cerebrospinal fluid release (spinal tap test, STT). The perfusion parameters (negative integral (NI), time of arrival (T0), time to peak (TTP), mean transit time, and the difference TTP—T0 were analysed.
Three different groups of patients were identified preoperatively: In group 1 seven patients showed an increase in the cerebral perfusion and a clinical improvement after STT. The second group (9 patients) also revealed an increase of the cerebral perfusion, but no significant alteration of the clinical assessment could be found. In the third group neither the cerebral perfusion nor the clinical assessment changed. 14 of the 16 patients (group 1 and 2) were examined three months after shunt placement. 11 patients showed a good or excellent result, 2 patients revealed a fair assessment, and only 1 patient had transiently improved. No patient was downgraded after shunting. In the patient group 1 and 2 the NI increased significantly (effect size: 34%), whereas in group 3 no significant alteration of NI was observed.
PWI–MRI improves the prediction of outcome after shunt placement in patients with NPH and can offer new insights into the pathophysiology.
Key wordsnormal pressure hydrocephalus brain perfusion magnetic resonance imaging
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Meier U (2001) The Importance of the Intrathecal Infusion Test in the Diagnostics of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Biomed Tech (Berl) 46(7–8):191–199Google Scholar
- 8.Kiefer M, Steudel WI (1994) Moderne Diagnostik und Therapie des hydrocephalus beim älteren Patienten. Saarländisches Ärzteblatt 10:498–504Google Scholar
- 12.Hertel F, Walter C, Schmitt M, Morsdorf M, Jammers W, Busch HP, Bettag M (2003) Is a Combination of Tc– SPECT or Perfusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Spinal Tap Test Helpful in the Diagnosis of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74(4):479–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Bortz J, Lienert GA, Boehnke K (2000) Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik. 2nd ed. Berlin, Springer VerlagGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kirk RE (1982) Experimental design. Monterey, CA: Brooks/ColeGoogle Scholar
- 17.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
- 20.Mori K, Maeda M, Asegawa S, Iwata J (2002) Quantitative Local Cerebral Blood Flow Change After Cerebrospinal Fluid Removal in Patients With Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Measured by a Double Injection Method With N–Isopropyl–p–[123I] Iodoamphetamine. Acta Neurochir. (Wien. ) 144(3):255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kristensen B, Malm J, Fagerland M, Hietala SO, Johansson B, Ekstedt J, Karlsson T (1996) Regional Cerebral Blood Flow, White Matter Abnormalities, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Hydrodynamics in Patients With Idiopathic Adult Hydrocephalus Syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 60(3):282–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar