Journal of Neurology

, Volume 252, Issue 12, pp 1465–1471 | Cite as

Alteration of cerebral perfusion in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus measured by 3D perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging




It is controversial whether alteration of cerebral perfusion plays an important role in the pathophysiology of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and can help to predict the outcome after shunt surgery.

Materials and Methods

28 patients with suspected NPH were examined clinically (Homburg Hydrocephalus Scale, walking test, incontinence protocol) and by 3D dynamic susceptibility based perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (PWI–MRI) before and after cerebrospinal fluid release (spinal tap test, STT). The perfusion parameters (negative integral (NI), time of arrival (T0), time to peak (TTP), mean transit time, and the difference TTP—T0 were analysed.


Three different groups of patients were identified preoperatively: In group 1 seven patients showed an increase in the cerebral perfusion and a clinical improvement after STT. The second group (9 patients) also revealed an increase of the cerebral perfusion, but no significant alteration of the clinical assessment could be found. In the third group neither the cerebral perfusion nor the clinical assessment changed. 14 of the 16 patients (group 1 and 2) were examined three months after shunt placement. 11 patients showed a good or excellent result, 2 patients revealed a fair assessment, and only 1 patient had transiently improved. No patient was downgraded after shunting. In the patient group 1 and 2 the NI increased significantly (effect size: 34%), whereas in group 3 no significant alteration of NI was observed.


PWI–MRI improves the prediction of outcome after shunt placement in patients with NPH and can offer new insights into the pathophysiology.

Key words

normal pressure hydrocephalus brain perfusion magnetic resonance imaging 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adams RD, Fischer CM, Hakim S, Ojeman RG, Sweet WH (1965) Symptomatic Occult Hydrocephalus With Normal Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure. N Engl J Med 273:117–126 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hebb AO, Cusimano MD (2001) Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: a Systematic Review of Diagnosis and Outcome. Neurosurgery 49(5):1166–1184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Savoiardo M, Grisoli M (2001) Imaging Dementias. Eur Radiol 11(3):484–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler– Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HA, Hermans J (2000) The Dutch Normal– Pressure Hydrocephalus Study. How to Select Patients for Shunting? An Analysis of Four Diagnostic Criteria. Surg Neurol 53(3):201–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wikkelso C, Andersson H, Blomstrand C, Lindqvist G, Svendsen P (1986) Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Predictive Value of the Cerebrospinal Fluid Tap–Test. Acta Neurol Scand 73(6):566–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meier U (2001) The Importance of the Intrathecal Infusion Test in the Diagnostics of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Biomed Tech (Berl) 46(7–8):191–199Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raftopoulos C, Chaskis C, Delecluse F, Cantraine F, Bidaut L, Brotchi J (1992) Morphological Quantitative Analysis of Intracranial Pressure Waves in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Neurol Res 14(5):389–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kiefer M, Steudel WI (1994) Moderne Diagnostik und Therapie des hydrocephalus beim älteren Patienten. Saarländisches Ärzteblatt 10:498–504Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Owler BK, Pickard JD (2001) Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Cerebral Blood Flow: a Review. Acta Neurol Scand 104(6):325–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greitz T (1969) Effect of Brain Distension on Cerebral Circulation. Lancet 1(7600):863–865PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waldemar G, Schmidt JF, Delecluse F, Andersen AR, Gjerris F, Paulson OB (1993) High Resolution SPECT With [99mTc]–d,l–HMPAO in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Before and After Shunt Operation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 56(6):655–664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hertel F, Walter C, Schmitt M, Morsdorf M, Jammers W, Busch HP, Bettag M (2003) Is a Combination of Tc– SPECT or Perfusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Spinal Tap Test Helpful in the Diagnosis of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74(4):479–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Black PM, Ojemann RG, Tzouras A (1985) CSF Shunts for Dementia, Incontinence, and Gait Disturbance. Clin Neurosurg 32:632–651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flacke S, Urbach H, Folkers PJ, Keller E, van den Brink JS, Traber F, Block W, Gieseke J, Schild HH (2000) Ultra–Fast Three–Dimensional MR Perfusion Imaging of the Entire Brain in Acute Stroke Assessment. J Magn Reson Imaging 11(3):250–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bortz J, Lienert GA, Boehnke K (2000) Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik. 2nd ed. Berlin, Springer VerlagGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kirk RE (1982) Experimental design. Monterey, CA: Brooks/ColeGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mamo HL, Meric PC, Ponsin JC, Rey AC, Luft AG, Seylaz JA (1987) Cerebral Blood Flow in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Stroke 18(6):1074–1080PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meyer JS, Tachibana H, Hardenberg JP, Dowell RE Jr, Kitagawa Y, Mortel KF (1984) Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Influences on Cerebral Hemodynamic and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure–Chemical Autoregulation. Surg Neurol 21(2):195–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mori K, Maeda M, Asegawa S, Iwata J (2002) Quantitative Local Cerebral Blood Flow Change After Cerebrospinal Fluid Removal in Patients With Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Measured by a Double Injection Method With N–Isopropyl–p–[123I] Iodoamphetamine. Acta Neurochir. (Wien. ) 144(3):255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kristensen B, Malm J, Fagerland M, Hietala SO, Johansson B, Ekstedt J, Karlsson T (1996) Regional Cerebral Blood Flow, White Matter Abnormalities, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Hydrodynamics in Patients With Idiopathic Adult Hydrocephalus Syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 60(3):282–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kushner M, Younkin D, Weinberger J, Hurtig H, Goldberg H, Reivich M (1984) Cerebral Hemodynamics in the Diagnosis of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Neurology 34(1):96–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee SK, Kim DI, Jeong EK, Yoon PH, Cha SH, Lee JH (2002) Temporal Changes in Reversible Cerebral Ischemia on Perfusion– and Diffusion– Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: the Value of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume Maps. Neuroradiology 44(2):103–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Klinge P, Fischer J, Brinker T, Heissler HE, Burchert W, Berding G, Knapp WH, Samii M (1998) PET and CBF Studies of Chronic Hydrocephalus: a Contribution to Surgical Indication and Prognosis. J Neuroimaging 8(4):205–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tanaka A, Kimura M, Nakayama Y, Yoshinaga S, Tomonaga M (1997) Cerebral Blood Flow and Autoregulation in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 40(6):1161–1165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ostergaard L, Sorensen AG, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR (1996) High Resolution Measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow Using Intravascular Tracer Bolus Passages. Part II: Experimental Comparison and Preliminary Results. Magn Reson Med 36(5):726–736PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wittsack HJ, Ritzl A, Modder U (2002) User Friendly Analysis of MR Investigations of the Cerebral Perfusion: Windows(R)–Based Image Processing. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 174(6):742–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ch. Walter
    • 1
  • F. Hertel
    • 2
  • E. Naumann
    • 3
  • M. Mörsdorf
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Radiology and NeuroradiologyKrankenhaus der Barmherzigen BrüderTrierGermany
  2. 2.Dept. of NeurosurgeryKrankenhaus der Barmherzigen BrüderTrierGermany
  3. 3.Dept. of PsychologyUniversity of TrierTrierGermany

Personalised recommendations