Journal of Neurology

, Volume 252, Issue 2, pp 168–175 | Cite as

Self-awareness after acquired brain injury

Predictors and rehabilitation
  • E. Noé
  • J. Ferri
  • M. C. Caballero
  • R. Villodre
  • A. Sanchez
  • J. Chirivella
ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the factors contributing to deficit in self-awareness following acquired brain injury and to study change in self-awareness during a group support program.

Methods

Sixty-two patients (mean age: 35.4±15.3 years) attending our Service (295±525 days after injury) were included in the study (41 of them had sustained a head injury). Thirty-six patients were admitted to a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program including a group support program designed to improve self-awareness deficits. All patients were assessed with the Patient Competency Rating Scale as a measure of self-awareness and with a broad range of neuropsychological tests, checklists of psychopathological symptoms, and several functional scales.

Results

Thirty patients showed high levels of self-awareness while 32 showed impaired self-awareness. Patients with appropriate perception of their deficits showed less psychopathological symptoms, better neuropsychological function and higher functional independence than those with impaired SA (Student’s t test, p<0.05). Both groups improved, but with different patterns, after rehabilitation (MANOVA, p<0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed that cognitive status was predictive of level of self-awareness.

Conclusion

The level of self-awareness after acquired brain injury is a useful prognostic index of the neuropsychological, psychopathological and functional status of the patient. We recommend the evaluation of this symptom after acquired brain injury due to its clinical relevance.

Key words

self-awareness acquired brain injury rehabilitation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Capruso DX, Levin HS (1992) Cognitive impairment following closed head injury. Neurol Clin 10:879–893Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Merskey H (1992) Psychiatric aspects of the neurology of trauma. Neurol Clin 10:895–905Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ben-Yishay Y, Diller L (1993) Cognitive remediation in traumatic brain injury: update and issues. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:204–213Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sherer M, Bergloff P, Levin E, High WM Jr, Oden KE, Nick TG (1998) Impaired awareness and employment outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 13:52–61Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trudel TM, Tyron W, Purdum C (1998) Awareness of disability and long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol 43:276–281Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sherer M, Hart T, Nick TG, Whyte J, Thompson RN, Yablon SA (2003) Early impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:168–176Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleming JM, Strong J, Ashton R (1996) Self-awareness of deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury: how best to measure? Brain Inj 10:1–15Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ, Zeiner HK (1986) Neuropsychological Rehabilitation After Brain Injury. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prigatano GP, Altman IM (1990) Impaired awareness of behavioral limitations after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71:1058–1064Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sherer M,Hart T, Nick TG (2003) Measurement of impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: a comparison of the patient competency rating scale and the awareness questionnaire. Brain Inj 17:25–37Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prigatano GP, Bruna O, Mataro M, Munoz JM, Fernandez S, Junque C (1998) Initial disturbances of consciousness and resultant impaired awareness in Spanish patients with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 13:29–38Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ownsworth TL, McFarland K, Young RM (2002) The investigation of factors underlying deficits in self-awareness and self-regulation. Brain Inj 16:291–309Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ownsworth TL, McFarland K, Young RM (2000) Self-awareness and psychological functioning following acquired brain injury: An evaluation of a group support programme. Neuropsychol Rehabil 10:465–484Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stuss DT (1991) Disturbances of Selfawareness after frontal system damage. In: Prigatano GP, Schacter DL, eds. awareness of deficit after brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press, pp 63–83Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Port A, Willmott C, Charlton J (2002) Self-awareness following traumatic brain injury and implications for rehabilitation. Brain Inj 16:277–289Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dirette D (2002) The development of awareness and the use of compensatory strategies for cognitive deficits. Brain Inj 16:861–871Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levin HS, O’Donnell VM, Grossman RG (1979) The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. J Nerv Ment Dis 167:675–684Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. Lancet 2:81–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wardlaw JM, Easton VJ, Statham P (2002) Which CT features help predict outcome after head injury? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72:188–192; discussion 151Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wechsler D (1999) Escala de Inteligencia para Adultos-III. Madrid: TEA Ediciones, S. A.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wechsler D (1987) Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Benedet MJ, Alejandre MA (1999) Test de Aprendizaje Verbal Complutense. Madrid: TEA EdicionesGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grant DA, Berg EA (1996) Test de Clasificación de Cartas de Wisconsin. Madrid: TEA Ediciones S. A.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rey A (1941) Léxamen psychologique dans les cas d’encephalopathie traumatique. Arch Psychol 28:286–340Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D’Elia LF, Satz P (1996) Color Trail Test. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, IncGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buriel Y, Rodés E, Böhm P, Peña-Casanova J (2002) Fluencia verbal y no verbal: estudio normativo piloto en una muestra española de adultos jóvenes (20–49 años). Neurología 17:557 (abstract)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    García-Albea J, Sanchez-Bernardos ML, Del Viso S (1998) Test de Boston para el diagnóstico de la afasia: adaptación española. MadridGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock M, Erbaugh J (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch-Genl Psychiatry 4:561–571Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zung WK (1971) A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics 12:371–379Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vilalta-Franch J, Lozano-Gallego M, Hernandez-Ferrandiz M, Llinas-Regla J, Lopez-Pousa S, Lopez OL (1999) The Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Psychometric properties of its adaptation into Spanish. Rev Neurol 29:15–19Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins HK, et al. (1982) Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 63:118–123Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B (1989) Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 42:703–709Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Keith RA, Granger C, Hamilton C, Sherwin FS (1987) The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehablin 1:6–18Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hall KM (1997) The Functional Assessment Measure. J Rehabil Outcomes 1:63–65Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wesolowski MD, Zencius AH (1994) A Practical Guide to Head Injury Rehabilitation. A focus on Postacute Residential Treatment. New York: Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Abreu BC, Seale G, Scheibel RS, Huddleston N, Zhang L, Ottenbacher KJ (2001) Levels of self-awareness after acute brain injury: how patients’ and rehabilitation specialists’ perceptions compare. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:49–56Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fleming JM, Strong J, Ashton R (1998) Cluster analysis of self-awareness levels in adults with traumatic brain injury and relationship to outcome. J Head Trauma Rehabil 13:39–51Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sherer M, Boake C, Levin E, Silver BV, Ringholz G, High WM Jr (1998) Characteristics of impaired awareness after traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 4:380–387Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Anderson SW, Tranel D (1989) Awareness of disease states following cerebral infarction, dementia, and head trauma: standardized assessment. Clin Neuropsychol 3:327–339Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fleming J, Strong J (1997) The development of insight following severe traumatic brain injury: three case studies. Br J Occupat Ther 60:295–300Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Toglia J, Kirk U (2000) Understanding awareness deficits following brain injury. Neurorehabilitation 15:57–70Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bisiach E, Vallar G, Perani D, Papagno C, Berti A (1986) Unawareness of disease following lesions of the right hemisphere: anosognosia for hemiplegia and anosognosia for hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 24:471–482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Crosson B, Barco PP, Velozo CA, et al. (1989) Awareness of compensation in postacute head injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 4:46–54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Noé
    • 1
  • J. Ferri
    • 1
  • M. C. Caballero
    • 1
  • R. Villodre
    • 1
  • A. Sanchez
    • 1
  • J. Chirivella
    • 1
  1. 1.Servicio de DañoCerebral Hospital Valencia al Mar, C/Río Tajo no1ValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations