Comparison of different iterative CT reconstruction techniques and filtered back projection for assessment of the medial clavicular epiphysis in forensic age estimation
To assess the impact of iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection (FBP) on image quality in computed tomography (CT)-based forensic age estimation of the medial clavicular epiphysis.
Methods and materials
CT of the clavicle was performed in 19 patients due to forensic reasons (70 mAs/140 kVp). Raw data were reconstructed with FBP and with an iterative algorithm at level 4 and 6. Clavicular ossification stage was determined by two radiologists in consensus, firstly on FBP reconstructed images and secondly after reviewing all reconstructions including iDose 4 and 6. In addition, the 3 reconstructions were compared regarding artefacts and delineation of the meta-/epiphyseal interface. Quantitative image noise was measured.
Quantitative noise was lower in iDose 6 reconstructed images than in FBP (P < 0.042), but not significantly lower between iDose 4 and FBP (P = 0.127). Side by side comparison revealed lesser qualitative image noise on both iDose reconstructed images than for FBP. The meta-/epiphyseal interface delineation was rated better on both iDose levels than with FBP. In 3 of 19 patients, the clavicular ossification stage was reclassified after iterative reconstructions had been additionally reviewed.
Using iterative CT reconstruction algorithms, a reduction of image noise and an enhancement of image quality regarding the meta-/epiphyseal clavicular interface can be achieved. The study highlights the importance of image standardization as variation of reconstruction technique has impact on forensic age estimation.
KeywordsIterative reconstruction CT Forensic age estimation Clavicle
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This retrospective study was approved by the local ethics committee with waived informed consent due to the use of anonymized data.
- 1.Wittschieber D, Schulz R, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A, Schmidt S (2017) Systematic procedure for identifying the five main ossification stages of the medial clavicular epiphysis using computed tomography: a practical proposal for forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med 131(1):217–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1444-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Wittschieber D, Schulz R, Vieth V, Kuppers M, Bajanowski T, Ramsthaler F, Puschel K, Pfeiffer H, Schmidt S, Schmeling A (2014) The value of sub-stages and thin slices for the assessment of the medial clavicular epiphysis: a prospective multi-center CT study. Forensic sci, med, pathol 10(2):163–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-013-9511-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Schmeling A, Dettmeyer R, Rudolf E, Vieth V, Geserick G (2016) In Reply. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113(27-28):488. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2016.0488
- 5.Kellinghaus M, Schulz R, Vieth V, Schmidt S, Schmeling A (2010) Forensic age estimation in living subjects based on the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis as revealed by thin-slice multidetector computed tomography. Int J Legal Med 124(2):149–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0398-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Rudolf E, Kramer J, Schmidt S, Vieth V, Winkler I, Schmeling A (2018) Intraindividual incongruences of medially ossifying clavicles in borderline adults as seen from thin-slice CT studies of 2595 male persons. Int J Legal Med 132(2):629–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1694-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Rudolf E, Kramer J, Schmidt S, Vieth V, Winkler I, Schmeling A (2019) Anatomic shape variants of extremitas sternalis claviculae as collected from sternoclavicular thin-slice CT-studies of 2820 male borderline-adults. Int J Legal Med 133(5):1517–1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02065-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.(BfS) FOfRP (2016) Reference levels value in diagnostic and interventional radiology (Bekanntmachung der aktualisierten diagnostischen Referenzwerte für diagnostische und interventionelle Röntgenanwendungen). Information Provided by the Federal GovernmentGoogle Scholar
- 13.(ICRP) ICoRP (2007) Radiological Protection in Medicine. ICRP Publication105 (AnnICRP) 37 (6)Google Scholar
- 14.Schofield R, King L, Tayal U, Castellano I, Stirrup J, Pontana F, Earls J, Nicol E (2019) Image reconstruction: Part 1 - understanding filtered back projection, noise and image acquisition. Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2019.04.008
- 15.Tayal U, King L, Schofield R, Castellano I, Stirrup J, Pontana F, Earls J, Nicol E (2019) Image reconstruction in cardiovascular CT: Part 2 - Iterative reconstruction; potential and pitfalls. Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography 13(3):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2019.04.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Hoang JK, Yoshizumi TT, Nguyen G, Toncheva G, Choudhury KR, Gafton AR, Eastwood JD, Lowry C, Hurwitz LM (2012) Variation in tube voltage for adult neck MDCT: effect on radiation dose and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(3):621–627. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.11.6831 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Namasivayam S, Kalra MK, Pottala KM, Waldrop SM, Hudgins PA (2006) Optimization of Z-axis automatic exposure control for multidetector row CT evaluation of neck and comparison with fixed tube current technique for image quality and radiation dose. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(10):2221–2225PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre JB, Duhamel A, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2011) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): Evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 21(3):627–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1990-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Tozakidou M, Reisinger C, Harder D, Lieb J, Szucs-Farkas Z, Muller-Gerbl M, Studler U, Schindera S, Hirschmann A (2018) Systematic radiation dose reduction in cervical spine CT of human cadaveric specimens: how low can we go? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39(2):385–391. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5490 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Kellinghaus M, Schulz R, Vieth V, Schmidt S, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A (2010) Enhanced possibilities to make statements on the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis using an amplified staging scheme in evaluating thin-slice CT scans. Int J Legal Med 124(4):321–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0448-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G, Schmidt B, Flohr T, Goetti R, Pfammatter T, Frauenfelder T, Alkadhi H (2011) Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol 21(12):2521–2526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2227-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Veldhoen S, Laqmani A, Derlin T, Karul M, Hammerle D, Buhk JH, Sehner S, Nagel HD, Chun F, Adam G, Regier M (2014) 256-MDCT for evaluation of urolithiasis: iterative reconstruction allows for a significant reduction of the applied radiation dose while maintaining high subjective and objective image quality. Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology 58(3):283–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12159 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Scharte P, Vieth V, Schulz R, Ramsthaler F, Puschel K, Bajanowski T, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A, Schmidt S, Wittschieber D (2017) Comparison of imaging planes during CT-based evaluation of clavicular ossification: a multi-center study. Int J Legal Med 131(5):1391–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1615-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Omoumi P, Verdun FR, Ben Salah Y, Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Malghem J, Ott JG, Meuli R, Becce F (2014) Low-dose multidetector computed tomography of the cervical spine: optimization of iterative reconstruction strength levels. Acta Radiol 55(3):335–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185113494981 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar