Genetic polymorphisms and mutation rates of 16 X-STRs in a Han Chinese population of Beijing and application examples in second-degree kinship cases
As a supplementary tool in forensic cases, X chromosomal short tandem repeats (X-STRs) might bridge large pedigree gaps and bring inspiration to forensic practices for the special mode of inheritance. To standardize the application of X-STRs, the DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) presented recommendations concentrating on biostatistical evaluations. Following this guideline, in this study, 1247 (655 females and 592 males) unrelated individuals and 770 families originating from a Han Chinese population of Beijing were investigated with 16 X-STRs. The combined PDF and PDM were 0.999999999999994 and 0.999999997, respectively. The combined MECKrüger, MECKishida, MECDesmarais, and MECDesmarais duo were 0.999972736708864, 0.999999975670766, 0.999999975720931, and 0.999993489709197, respectively. In addition, a population comparison demonstrated that genetic heterogeneity widely exists between the Han population of Beijing and other populations, especially southern Han Chinese, European, and West African populations. Additionally, the overall mutation rates of the paternal and maternal germlines of the 16 X-STRs were 0.0021 and 0.0003, respectively. Among them, HPRTB showed the highest paternal mutation rate of 0.0094. Finally, based on these forensic parameters, the likelihood ratios of four second-degree kinship cases were evaluated. Comparing with autosomal STR, X-STR showed significant advantages for hypothesis exclusion. Our study indicated that the 16 X-STR loci are highly polymorphic in the Han population of Beijing and could be a satisfactory complimentary tool for forensic applications.
KeywordsX-STRs Genetic polymorphism Mutation rate Chinese Beijing Han population Kinship testing
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no completing interests.
- 1.Hearne CM, Todd JA (1991) Tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism at the HPRT locus. Nucleic Acids Res 19:5450Google Scholar
- 9.Tillmar AO, Kling D, Butler JM, Parson W, Prinz M, Schneider PM, Egeland T, Gusmão L (2017) DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): guidelines on the use of X-STRs in kinship analysis. Forensic Sci Int Genet 29:269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.García MG, Gusmão L, Catanesi CI, Penacino GA, Pinto N (2017) Mutation rate of 12 X-STRs from investigator Argus X-12 kit in Argentine population. Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement 6Google Scholar
- 13.Liu YJ, Guo LH, Yue JT, Shi MS (2016) Forensic application of 16 X-STR loci in Henan Han population. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi 32: 420–423. doi: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-5619.2016.06.006
- 14.Gao HM, Wang C, Han SY, Sun SH, Xiao DJ, Wang YS, Li CT, Zhang MX (2017) Analysis of the 19 Y-STR and 16 X-STR loci system in the Han population of Shandong province, China. Genetics and molecular research : GMR 16. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16019573
- 17.Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higushi R (2013) Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 10(4): 506−13 (April 1991). Biotechniques 54: 134–139. doi: https://doi.org/10.2144/000114018
- 18.Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2007) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinformatics Online 1:47–50Google Scholar
- 21.Phillips C, Ballard D, Gill P, Court DS, Carracedo A, Lareu MV (2012) The recombination landscape around forensic STRs: accurate measurement of genetic distances between syntenic STR pairs using HapMap high density SNP data. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6:354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Gill P, Hicks T, Butler JM, Connolly E, Gusmão L, Kokshoorn B, Morling N, van Oorschot RAH, Parson W, Prinz M, Schneider PM, Sijen T, Taylor D (2018) DNA commission of the international society for forensic genetics: assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions. Forensic Sci Int Genet 36:189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar