Advancing estimation of chronological age by utilizing available evidence based on two radiographical methods
- 289 Downloads
This paper describes a strategy for estimating chronological age of individuals based on age indicators of X-ray of the hand and the third molar tooth. The great majority of studies in the field provide group-wise data of different formats, which makes them difficult to compare and utilize in a model. In this paper, we have provided a framework to utilize different types of data formats to build a common model for estimating chronological age. We used transition analysis to describe the relationship between the age indicators and chronological age. Further, likelihood ratio weight of evidence and posterior distribution of chronological age were used to model the distribution of chronological age given the observed age indicators. Being able to utilize such a large amount of data, with different data formats, from different studies, as presented in this paper improves previous age estimation methods.
KeywordsAge estimation Bayesian inference Likelihood ratio Demirjian’s Greulich and Pyle
We thank Jayakumar Jayaraman, Simon Camilleri, Rick R. van Rijn, Marco Tisè, Eugénia Cunha, and Abdul Mueed Zafar for providing data and Peter Gill for proofreading. We also want to thank the reviewers for their useful comments.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.European Asylum Support Office (2013) EASO Age assessment practice in Europe. LuxemburgGoogle Scholar
- 2.Greulich W, Pyle S (1959) Radiograph Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist, 2nd edn. StanfordGoogle Scholar
- 3.Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM (1973) A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 45(2):211–227Google Scholar
- 8.Dahlberg P, Mosdøl A, Ding KY, Bleka Ø, Rolseth V, Straumann GH et al (2017) Agreement between chronological age and bone age based on the Greulich & Pyle-atlas for age estimation: a systematic review. Folkehelseinstituttet, OsloGoogle Scholar
- 9.Rolseth V, Mosdøl A, Dahlberg PS, Ding KY, Bleka Ø, Skjerven-Martinsen M et al (2017) Demirjian’s development stages on wisdom teeth for estimation of chronological age: a systematic review. Folkehelseinstituttet, OsloGoogle Scholar
- 11.Boldsen JL, Milner GR, Konigsberg LW, Wood JW (2002) Transition analysis: a new method for estimating age from skeletons. Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology. 73–106Google Scholar
- 12.Royall RM (1997) Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm. Hall Ca, editor. LondonGoogle Scholar
- 16.Johan NA, Khamis MF, Abdul Jamal NS, Ahmad B, Mahanani ES (2012) The variability of lower third molar development in Northeast Malaysian population with application to age estimation. J Forensic Odonto-Stomatol 30(1):45–54Google Scholar
- 21.Agresti A (2003) Logit models for multinomial responses. Categorical data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p 267–313Google Scholar
- 22.Yee TW (2010) The VGAM Package for Categorical Data Analysis. J Stat Softw 1(10)Google Scholar
- 23.Yee TW (2017) VGAM: Vector Generalized Linear and Additive Models. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=VGAM
- 27.Aitken CGG, Taroni F (2005) The evaluation of evidence. Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p 69–118Google Scholar
- 31.Agresti A (2003) Random effects: generalized linear mixed models for categorical responses. Categorical data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p 491–537Google Scholar
- 32.Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Fixed-effect versus random- effects models. Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p 77–86Google Scholar