Advertisement

Coronary artery CT calcium score assessed by direct calcium quantification using atomic absorption spectroscopy and compared to macroscopic and histological assessments

  • Alexandra G. GheorgheEmail author
  • Christina Jacobsen
  • Ragnar Thomsen
  • Kristian Linnet
  • Niels Lynnerup
  • Claus B. Andersen
  • Andreas Fuchs
  • Klaus F. Kofoed
  • Jytte Banner
Original Article

Abstract

The Agatston score (AS) is the gold standard CT calcium scoring method in clinical practice. However, the AS is an indirect method of determining calcium amount, whereas atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) can directly measure the calcium amount. Our primary aim was to investigate the association between the AS and the coronary calcium amount measured by AAS. Furthermore, we compared our outcome to the macroscopic and histological coronary calcification and stenosis assessment, thus allowing us to infer a clinical coronary artery status based on post-mortem findings. Deceased individuals were examined with a 64-slice multidetector CT scanner, and the AS was determined. At autopsy, the degree of CAC and stenosis was determined, and the coronary arteries were excised and weighed. The coronary arteries were decalcified in a solution that was examined using AAS to measure the calcium amount. The degree of CAC and stenosis was also assessed by a histological examination. One hundred thirty-two coronary arteries were examined, and AS was highly correlated to the coronary calcium amount, measured by AAS, (r2 = 0.72, Pearson 0.85, p < 0.0001). In cases with AS 0, AAS measurements showed zero or very low calcium amounts. AS was also correlated to macroscopic and histological calcification assessments (Spearman’s rho 0.68, p < 0.0001, Spearman’s rho 0.82, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, an underestimation of subclinical atherosclerosis was seen and AS 0 could not rule out stenosis.

Keywords

Agatston score Atomic absorption spectroscopy Coronary artery calcification Coronary artery disease Calcium scoring Coronary calcium scoring method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the physicians, morgue technicians, laboratory assistants, and medical students for their assistance in the SURVIVE project, as well as laboratory assistants at Vendsyssel sygehus; Region Nordjylland, for preparing, staining, and sending all the histological sections and statistician; and Kyle Raymond, PhD, for statistical guidance and help.

Funding

This project was sponsored by the Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen (Unit number 361100).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

The National Committee on Danish Health Research Ethics approved (01-20-2014) the research protocol (version 2.0 number 1377517).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained for all deceased individuals participants included in the study. The next of kin gave informed written or oral consents.

Supplementary material

414_2018_1998_MOESM1_ESM.docx (128 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 127 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Sandfort V, Bluemke DA (2017) CT calcium scoring. History, current status and outlook. Diagn Interv Imaging 98:3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2016.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Araki T, Banchhor SK, Londhe ND, Ikeda N, Radeva P, Shukla D, Saba L, Balestrieri A, Nicolaides A, Shafique S, Laird JR, Suri JS (2016) Reliable and accurate calcium volume measurement in coronary artery using intravascular ultrasound videos. J Med Syst 40:51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0407-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fuchs A, Groen JM, Arnold BA, Nikolovski S, Knudsen AD, Kühl JT, Nordestgaard BG, Greuter MJW, Kofoed KF (2017) Assessment of coronary calcification using calibrated mass score with two different multidetector computed tomography scanners in the Copenhagen General Population Study. Eur J Radiol 88:21–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu W, Zhang Y, Yu C-M, Ji Q-W, Cai M, Zhao Y-X et al (2015) Current understanding of coronary artery calcification. J Geriatr Cardiol 12:668–675.  https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.06.012 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, Cooney MT, Corrà U, Cosyns B, Deaton C, Graham I, Hall MS, Hobbs FDR, Løchen ML, Löllgen H, Marques-Vidal P, Perk J, Prescott E, Redon J, Richter DJ, Sattar N, Smulders Y, Tiberi M, van der Worp HB, van Dis I, Verschuren WMM (2016) 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J 37:2315–2381.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davari SA, Masjedi S, Ferdous Z, Mukherjee D (2017) In-vitro analysis of early calcification in aortic valvular interstitial cells using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). J Biophotonics 11.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201600288
  7. 7.
    Lee J (2011) Coronary artery calcium scoring and its impact on the clinical practice in the era of multidetector CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(Suppl 1):9–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9964-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hinzpeter R, Higashigaito K, Morsbach F, Benz D, Manka R, Seifert B, Keller DI, Alkadhi H (2017) Coronary artery calcium scoring for ruling-out acute coronary syndrome in chest pain CT. Am J Emerg Med 35:1565–1567.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Agustín JA, Gómez de Diego JJ, Marcos-Alberca P, Mahía P, Rodrigo JL, Luaces M et al (2017) Impact of calcium score on agreement between multidetector computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography. Rev Espanola Cardiol Engl Ed.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2017.04.012
  10. 10.
    Mittal TK, Pottle A, Nicol E, Barbir M, Ariff B, Mirsadraee S, Dubowitz M, Gorog DA, Clifford P, Firoozan S, Smith R, Dubrey S, Chana H, Shah J, Stephens N, Travill C, Kelion A, Pakkal M, Timmis A (2017) Prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease and prognosis in patients with stable symptoms and a zero-coronary calcium score. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:922–929.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knapper JT, Khosa F, Blaha MJ, Lebeis TA, Kay J, Sandesara PB, Kelkar AA, Berman DS, Quyyumi AA, Budoff MJ, Min JK, Valenti V, Giambrone AE, Callister TQ, Shaw LJ (2016) Coronary calcium scoring for long-term mortality prediction in patients with and without a family history of coronary disease. Heart 102:204–208.  https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dijkstra H, Greuter MJW, Groen JM, Vliegenthart-Proença R, Renema KWK, de Lange F et al (2010) Coronary calcium mass scores measured by identical 64-slice MDCT scanners are comparable: a cardiac phantom study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:89–98.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9503-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Budoff MJ, Gul K (2006) Computed tomographic cardiovascular imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 27:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knudsen AD, Fuchs A, Kühl JT, Arnold BA, Nordestgaard BG, Køber LV, Kofoed KF (2018) Coronary artery calcium assessed with calibrated mass scoring in asymptomatic individuals: results from the Copenhagen General Population Study. Eur Radiol 28:4607–4614.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5446-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST, Weinstein SR, Mosler TP, Tseng PH et al (2007) Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1860–1870.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Budoff MJ, Gul KM (2008) Expert review on coronary calcium. Vasc Health Risk Manag 4:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berman DS, Arnson Y, Rozanski A (2016) Coronary artery calcium scanning: the Agatston score and beyond. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:1417–1419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Joshi PH, Patel B, Blaha MJ, Berry JD, Blankstein R, Budoff MJ, Wong N, Agatston A, Blumenthal RS, Nasir K (2016) Coronary artery calcium predicts cardiovascular events in participants with a low lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Atherosclerosis 246:367–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.01.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gupta A, Lau E, Varshney R, Hulten EA, Cheezum M, Bittencourt MS, Blaha MJ, Wong ND, Blumenthal RS, Budoff MJ, Umscheid CA, Nasir K, Blankstein R (2017) The identification of calcified coronary plaque is associated with initiation and continuation of pharmacological and lifestyle preventive therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:833–842.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.01.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xie X, Zhao Y, de Bock GH, de Jong PA, Mali WP, Oudkerk M, Vliegenthart R (2013) Validation and prognosis of coronary artery calcium scoring in nontriggered thoracic computed tomography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:514–521.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ahmed W, de Graaf MA, Broersen A, Kitslaar PH, Oost E, Dijkstra J, Bax JJ, Reiber JHC, Scholte AJ (2015) Automatic detection and quantification of the Agatston coronary artery calcium score on contrast computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31:151–161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0519-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith SJ, Emery R, Pitsillides A, Clarkin CE, Mahajan S (2017) Detection of early osteogenic commitment in primary cells using Raman spectroscopy. Analyst 142:1962–1973.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6an02469f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blaha MJ, Mortensen MB, Kianoush S, Tota-Maharaj R, Cainzos-Achirica M (2017) Coronary artery calcium scoring: is it time for a change in methodology? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:923–937.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sowmya R, Indumathi KP, Arora S, Sharma V, Singh AK (2015) Detection of calcium based neutralizers in milk and milk products by AAS. J Food Sci Technol 52:1188–1193.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1091-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hanifehpour R, Motevalli M, Ghanaati H, Shahriari M, Aliyari GM (2016;In Press) Diagnostic accuracy of coronary calcium score less than 100 in excluding coronary artery disease. Iran J Radiol.  https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.16705
  26. 26.
    Basso C, Aguilera B, Banner J, Cohle S, d’Amati G, de Gouveia RH et al (2017) Guidelines for autopsy investigation of sudden cardiac death: 2017 update from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology. Virchows Arch Int J Pathol 471:691–705.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-017-2221-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Groen JM, Kofoed KF, Zacho M, Vliegenthart R, Willems TP, Greuter MJW (2013) Calcium score of small coronary calcifications on multidetector computed tomography: results from a static phantom study. Eur J Radiol 82:e58–e63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rukov JL, Gravesen E, Mace ML, Hofman-Bang J, Vinther J, Andersen CB, Lewin E, Olgaard K (2016) Effect of chronic uremia on the transcriptional profile of the calcified aorta analyzed by RNA sequencing. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 310:F477–F491.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00472.2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sheppard MN (2012) Approach to the cardiac autopsy. J Clin Pathol 65:484–495.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Conte E, Annoni A, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, Guglielmo M, Baggiano A, Volpato V, Agalbato C, Bonomi A, Veglia F, Formenti A, Fiorentini C, Bartorelli AL, Pepi M, Andreini D (2017) Evaluation of coronary plaque characteristics with coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:1170–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew200 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Greuter MJW, Dijkstra H, Groen JM, Vliegenthart R, de Lange F, Renema WKJ, de Bock GH, Oudkerk M (2007) 64 slice MDCT generally underestimates coronary calcium scores as compared to EBT: a phantom study. Med Phys 34:3510–3519.  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2750733 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Greuter MJW, Groen JM, Nicolai LJ, Dijkstra H, Oudkerk M (2009) A model for quantitative correction of coronary calcium scores on multidetector, dual source, and electron beam computed tomography for influences of linear motion, calcification density, and temporal resolution: a cardiac phantom study. Med Phys 36:5079–5088.  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3213536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Joshi FR, Lindsay AC, Obaid DR, Falk E, Rudd JHF (2012) Non-invasive imaging of atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13:205–218.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jer319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schoenhagen P, Ghoshhajra B, Achenbach S, Abbara S (2016) Interpretation of “incidental” cardiovascular findings in standard chest CTs impact of evolving scanner technology on educational requirements. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10:289–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2016.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schoenhagen P, Barreto M, Halliburton SS (2008) Quantitative plaque characterization with coronary CT angiography (CTA): current challenges and future application in atherosclerosis trials and clinical risk assessment. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:313–316.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-007-9284-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Koos R, Mahnken AH, Kühl HP, Mühlenbruch G, Mevissen V, Stork L et al (2006) Quantification of aortic valve calcification using multislice spiral computed tomography: comparison with atomic absorption spectroscopy. Investig Radiol 41:485–489.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000208224.93467.87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen H, Kassab GS (2016) Microstructure-based biomechanics of coronary arteries in health and disease. J Biomech 49:2548–2559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kim W-J, Kwon CH, Han S, Lee WS, Kang JW, Ahn J-M, Lee JY, Park DW, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ (2016) Role of coronary artery calcium scoring in detection of coronary artery disease according to Framingham risk score in populations with low to intermediate risks. J Korean Med Sci 31:902–908.  https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.6.902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    De Marco E, Vacchiano G, Frati P, La Russa R, Santurro A, Scopetti M et al (2018) Evolution of post-mortem coronary imaging: from selective coronary arteriography to post-mortem CT-angiography and beyond. Radiol Med (Torino) 123:351–358.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0855-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Franco S, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Mackey RH, Magid DJ, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McGuire D, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Mussolino ME, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Pandey DK, Paynter NP, Reeves MJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB, American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee (2014) Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 129:e28–e292.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Winham SJ, de Andrade M, Miller VM (2015) Genetics of cardiovascular disease: importance of sex and ethnicity. Atherosclerosis 241:219–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.03.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sillesen H, Falk E (2011) Why not screen for subclinical atherosclerosis? Lancet Lond Engl 378:645–646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60059-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Correia LCL, Esteves FP, Carvalhal M, de Souza TMB, de Sá N, de Correia VC A et al (2017) Zero calcium score as a filter for further testing in patients admitted to the coronary Care unit with chest pain. Arq Bras Cardiol.  https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170076
  44. 44.
    Falk E, Nakano M, Bentzon JF, Finn AV, Virmani R (2013) Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists’ view. Eur Heart J 34:719–728.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yahagi K, Kolodgie FD, Otsuka F, Finn AV, Davis HR, Joner M, Virmani R (2016) Pathophysiology of native coronary, vein graft, and in-stent atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol 13:79–98.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2015.164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra G. Gheorghe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christina Jacobsen
    • 1
  • Ragnar Thomsen
    • 2
  • Kristian Linnet
    • 2
  • Niels Lynnerup
    • 1
  • Claus B. Andersen
    • 1
  • Andreas Fuchs
    • 3
  • Klaus F. Kofoed
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jytte Banner
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Forensic Pathology, Department of Forensic MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Section of Forensic Chemistry, Department of Forensic MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, RigshospitaletUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Radiology, Diagnostic Centre, RigshospitaletUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations