Discriminant analysis of mandibular measurements for the estimation of sex in a modern Brazilian sample
The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of mandibular measurements for sex determination in a Brazilian population. The sample was composed of 100 mandibles, of which 53 were female and 47 were male, and the average age was 57.03 years. The mandible measurement protocol was composed of 15 measurements, of which six were bilateral and nine were unique. Mandibles were directly measured using a digital caliper and a protractor. The descriptive analysis of the present study revealed higher mean values for male mandibles compared to those for female mandibles with the exception of the left mandibular angle. Among the 21 measures analyzed in this group, 15 were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Univariate discriminant analyses produced a mean percentage of correct predictions that varied between 49 and 79%. The association of variables increased the percentage of correct prediction of sex to vary from 76 to 86%. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that the best variable for estimating sex was bigonial breadth (BGB; area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.764) followed by the right maximum ramus height (MRHr; AUC = 0.763). A reference table for estimating sex in a Brazilian population using mandible measurements was developed based on the ROC curve analysis. Mandibular measures provide a simple and reliable method for sex discrimination in Brazilian adults due to the sexual dimorphism revealed by analysis of the metric variables and the satisfactory results demonstrated by discriminant formulas, ROC curve analysis, and the reference table.
KeywordsForensic anthropology Human identification Sex determination by skeleton Forensic dentistry Mandible
This investigation was funded by the State of São Paulo’s Research Fund (FAPESP, process numbers 2014/13340-7, 2014/23727-6 and 2011/18577-7).
Compliance with ethical standards
This investigation was conducted in accordance with the international and national parameters of ethical investigations of human beings. The investigation protocol was submitted and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of São Paulo’s School of Dentistry (FOUSP), process number 1.556.080.
- 3.Frayer DW, Wolpoff MH (1985) Sexual dimorphism. Annu Rev Anthropol 14(1):429–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.14.100185.002241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Torimitsu S, Makino Y, Saitoh H, Sakuma A, Ishii N, Yajima D, Inokuchi G, Motomura A, Chiba F, Yamaguchi R, Hashimoto M, Hoshioka Y, Iwase H (2015) Morphometric analysis of sex differences in contemporary Japanese pelves using multidetector computed tomography. Forensic Sci Int 257:530.e531–530.e537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Carvalho SPM, Brito LM, de Paiva LAS, Bicudo LAR, Crosato EM, de Oliveira RN (2013) Validation of a physical anthropology methodology using mandibles for gender estimation in a Brazilian population. J Appl Oral Sci 21(4):358–362. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-775720130022 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Tunis TS, Sarig R, Cohen H, Medlej B, Peled N, May H (2017) Sex estimation using computed tomography of the mandible. Int J Legal Med:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1554-1
- 19.Standring S (2008) Gray’s anatomy—the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 40th edn. Churchill Livingstone, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 24.Franklin D, O'Higgins P, Oxnard CE (2008) Sexual dimorphism in the mandible of indigenous South Africans: a geometric morphometric approach. S Afr J Sci 104:101–106Google Scholar
- 33.Soficaru A, Constantinescu M, Culea M, Ionică C (2014) Evaluation of discriminant functions for sexing skulls from visually assessed traits applied in the Rainer Osteological Collection (Bucharest, Romania). HOMO J Comp Hum Biol 65(6):464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2014.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Lopez TT, Michel-Crosato E, Benedicto EN, Paiva LA, Silva DC, Biazevic MG (2017) Accuracy of mandibular measurements of sexual dimorphism using stabilizer equipment. Braz Oral Res 31:e1. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar