International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 131, Issue 6, pp 1573–1580 | Cite as

Diatoms in drowning cases in forensic veterinary context: a preliminary study

  • Nadia Fucci
  • Carlo P. Campobasso
  • L. Mastrogiuseppe
  • C. Puccinelli
  • S. Marcheggiani
  • L. Mancini
  • L. Marino
  • V. L. Pascali
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In this preliminary study, a digestive method used in forensic context to extract diatoms has been applied in organs taken from ten wildlife animals belonging three species of mammals (a deer, a roe and five otters) and one species of birds (two magpies). Only four carcasses were recovered from aquatic environments (bath trough for animals, bathtub irrigation, river) and only in three cases out of ten that the cause of death was ruled out as drowning. In seven cases, the death was due to other causes: gunshot injuries for one otter, blunt trauma for a magpie, and traumatic injuries followed by motor vehicle collision in other four otters and a roe. Post-mortem examination was performed in all carcasses. The diatom test protocol was performed according to the Italian guidelines for analysis of benthic diatoms for ecological status assessment of inland waters. Five grams of lung, liver, and kidney was taken from all the animal carcasses. In some cases, additional tissue samples were also available among which brain, heart, spleen, and bone marrow. In all four cases found in water, the drowning medium was also available. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) digestion was performed, and identification of 21 genera of diatoms was obtained. The method proved to be suitable for the identification of diatoms in the organs of the animals drowned supporting the final diagnosis of drowning. Only in otters, all died for causes other than drowning, diatoms did not prove to be suitable for the diagnosis of drowning since their presence in the internal organs was mainly related to their main diet based on fishmeal. The authors believe that this first trial is very promising, and the results suggest that diatom test can be easily applied in forensic veterinary context.

Keywords

Diatoms Forensic veterinary Drowning Forensic pathology 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Cooper JE, Cooper ME (2007) Introduction to veterinary and comparative forensic medicine. Blackwell, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper JE, Cooper ME (2008) Forensic veterinary medicine: a rapidly evolving discipline. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 4:75–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McEwen BJ, Gerdin J (2016) Veterinary forensic pathology: drowning and bodies recovered from water. Vet Pathol 53:1049–1056CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saukko P, Knight B (2004) Knight’s forensic pathology, 3rd edn. Hodder Arnold, London, pp 406–408Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lunetta P, Modell JH (2005) Macroscopical, microscopical and laboratory findings in drowning victims—a comprehensive review. In: Tsokos M (ed) Forensic pathology reviews, vol 3. Humana Press Inc, TotowaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Piette MH, De Letter EA (2006) Drowning: still a difficult autopsy diagnosis. Forensic Sci Int 163:1–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Munro R, Munro HMC (2013) Some challenges in forensic veterinary pathology: a review. J Comp Pathol 149:57–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moritz AR (1944) Chemical methods for the determination of death by drowning. Physiol Rev 24:70–88Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coe J (1974) Post-mortem chemistry: practical considerations and a review of the literature. J Forensic Sci 19:13–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piette M, Timperman J, Parisis N (1989) Serum strontium estimation as a medico-legal diagnostic indicator of drowning. Med Sci Law 29:162–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeanmonod R, Staub C, Mermillod B (1992) The reliability of cardiac haemodilution as a diagnostic test of drowning. Forensic Sci Int 52:171–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu BL, Ishida K, Taniguchi M, Quan L et al (2003) Possible post-mortem serum markers for differentiation between fresh-, saltwater drowning and acute cardiac death: a preliminary investigation. Legal Med 5:S298–S301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    de la Grandmaison GL, Leterreux M, Lasseuguette K et al (2006) Study of the diagnostic value of iron in fresh water drowning. Forensic Sci Int 157:117–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Azparren JE, Perucha E, Martinez P et al (2007) Factors affecting strontium absorption in drownings. Forensic Sci Int 168:138–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spitz WU (2004) Investigation of bodies in water. In: Spitz and Fischer’s medicolegal investigation of death: guidelines for the applications of pathology to crime investigation. 4th ed, Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, ILGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vieira DN (2011) Forensic medicine—from old problems to new challenge. In Tech, RijekaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Filograna L, Tartaglione T, Vetrugno G et al (2015) Freshwater drowning in child: a case study demonstrating the role of postmortem computed tomography. Med Sci Law 4:304–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lucci A, Campobasso CP, Cirnelli A et al (2008) A promising microbiological test for the diagnosis of drowning. Forensic Sci Int 182:20–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kakizaki E, Kozawa S, Sakai M et al (2009) Bioluminescent bacteria have potential as a marker of drowning in seawater: two immersed cadavers retrieved near estuaries. Legal Med 11:91–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kakizaki E, Kozawa S, Tashiro N et al (2009) Detection of bacterioplankton in immersed cadavers using selective agar plates. Legal Med 11:S350–S353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Uchiyama T, Kakizaki E, Kozawa S et al (2012) A new molecular approach to help conclude drowning as a cause of death: simultaneous detection of eight bacterioplankton species using real-time PCR assays with TaqMan probes. Forensic Sci Int 1-3:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kakizaki E, Ogura Y, Kozawa S et al (2012) Detection of diverse aquatic microbes in blood and organs of drowning victims: first metagenomic approach using high-throughput 454-pyrosequencing. Forensic Sci Int 1-3:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hendey NI (1973) The diagnostic value of diatoms in cases of drowning. Med Sci Law 13:23–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peabody AJ (1980) Diatoms and drowning—a review. Med Sci Law 20:254–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Auer A (1991) Qualitative diatom analysis as a tool to diagnose drowning. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 12:213–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pollanen MS, Cheung C, Chiasson DA (1997) The diagnostic value of the diatom test for drowning 1. Utility: a retrospective analysis of 771 cases of drowning in Ontario, Canada. J Forensic Sci 42:281–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pollanen MS (1998) Forensic diatomology and drowning. Elsevier, Amsterdam The Netherlands:1–157Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Round FE, Crawford RM, Mann DG (1990) The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–747Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Verma K (2013) Role of diatoms in the world of forensic sciences. J Forensic Res 4:2–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sashidharan A, Resmi S (2014) Forensic diatomology. Health Sciences 1:1–16Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vinayak V, Mishra V, Goyal MK (2013) Diatom fingerprinting to ascertain death in drowning cases. J Forensic Res 4:207Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lunetta P, Pentillä A, Hällfors G (1988) Scanning and transmission electron microscopical evidence of the capacity of diatoms to penetrate the alveolo-capillary barrier in drowning. Int J Legal Med 111:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bajanowski T, Brinkmann B, Stefanec AM et al (1998) Detection and analysis of tracer in experimental drowning. Int J Legal Med 111:57–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ludes B, Coste M, North N et al (1999) Diatom analysis in victim’s tissues as an indicator of the site of drowning. Int J Legal Med 112:163–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schneider V (1980) Detection of diatoms in the bone marrow of non-drowning victims. Z Rechtsmed 85:315–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Di Giancamillo A, Giudici E, Andreola S et al (2010) Immersion of piglet carcasses in water. The applicability of microscopic analysis and limits of diatom testing an animal model. Legal Med 10:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lunetta P, Miettinen A, Spilling K et al (2013) False positive diatom test: a real challenge? A post-mortem study using standardized protocol. Legal Med 15:229–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pachar JV, Cameron JM (1993) The diagnosis of drowning by the quantitative and qualitative diatom analysis. Med Sci Law 33:291–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yen LY, Jayaprakash PT (2007) Prevalence of diatom frustules in non-vegetarian foodstuffs and its implications in interpreting identification of diatom frustules in drowning cases. Forensic Sci Int 170:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ming M, Meng X, Wang E (2007) Evaluation of four digestive methods for extracting diatoms. Forensic Sci Int 170:29–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Taylor JJ (1998) Diatoms and drowning—a cautionary case note. Med Sci Law 34:78–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fucci N, Pascali VL, Puccinelli C et al (2015) Evaluation of two methods for the use of diatoms in drowning cases. Forensic Med Pathol 11(4):601–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    ISPRA (2007) Metodi biologici per le acque—Parte I. Manuali e Linee Guida APAT., http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/pubblicazioni/manuali-e-linee-guida/metodi-biologici-per-le-acque-parte-i
  44. 44.
    ISPRA (2014) Metodi biologici per le acque superficiali interne. Manuali e Linee Guida 111/2014, http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/…../MLG_111_2014_Metodi_Biologici_acque
  45. 45.
    Ludes B, Quantin S, Coste M et al (1994) Application of a simple enzymatic digestion method for diatom detection in the diagnosis of drowning in putrefied corpses by diatom analysis. Int J Legal Med 107:37–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Di Giancamillo A, Domeneghini C, Gibelli D et al (2011) Diatom extraction with HCl from animal tissues: a technical note. Legal Med 13:268–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fucci N (2012) A new procedure for diatom extraction in the diagnosis of drowning. Clin Exper Pharmacol 2:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hürlimann J, Feer P, Elber F et al (2000) Diatom detection in the diagnosis of death by drowning. Int J Legal Med 114:6–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Martınez-Giron R, Ribas-Barcelo A, Garcıa-Miralles T et al (2003) Diatoms and rotifers in cytological smears. Cytopathology 14:70–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Benson CJ, Edlund MB, Gray S et al (2013) The presence of diatom algae in a tracheal wash from a German Wirehaired Pointer with aspiration pneumonia. Vet Clin Pathol 42:221–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Modell JH, Moya F (1966) Effects of volume of aspirated fluid during chlorinated fresh water drowning. Anesthesiology 27:662–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Modell JH, Moya F, Newby EJ et al (1967) The effects of fluid volume in seawater drowning. Ann Intern Med 67:68–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Adamo M, Ambrosi L, Dell'Erba A et al (1963) La morte per annegamento. Ed. Minerva Medica 76–159Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gilbertson L, Safar P, Stezoski W et al (1982) Pattern of dying during cold water drowning in dogs. Crit Care Med 10:216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Conn AW, Miyasaka K, Katayama M et al (1995) A canine study of cold water drowning in fresh versus salt water. Crit Care Med 23:2029–2037CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Heffner GG, Rozanski EA, Beal MW et al (2008) Evaluation of freshwater submersion in small animals: 28 cases (1996-2006). J Am Vet Med Ass 232:244–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Suto M, Abe S, Nakamura H et al (2003) Phytoplankton gene detection in drowned rabbits. Legal Med 5:142–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zimmerman KA, Wallace JR (2008) The potential to determine a postmortem submersion interval based on algal/diatom diversity on decomposing mammalian carcasses in brackish ponds in Delaware. J Forensic Sci 53:935–941CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Knight B (1992) Forensic science and animal rights. Forensic Sci Int 57:1–3CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cattaneo C, Madema E, Rendinelli A et al (2015) Animal experimentation in forensic sciences: how far have we come? Forensic Sci Int 254:e-29–ee35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ludders JW, Schmidt RH, Dein FJ et al (1999) Drowning is not euthanasia. Wildl Soc Bull 27:666–670Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Leary S, Underwood W, Raymond A et al (2013) American veterinary medical association guidelines for the euthanasia of animals. 2013 ed, Schaumburg, ILGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    De Donno A, Campobasso CP, Santoro V et al (2014) Bodies in sequestered and non-sequestered aquatic environments: a comparative taphonomic study using decompositional scoring system. Sci Justice 54:439–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Introna F, Di Vella G, Campobasso CP (2013) Migrant deaths and the Kater Radez I wreck: from recovery of the relict to marine taphonomic findings and identification of the victims. Int J Legal Med 127:871–879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Recommendation no. R (99) 3 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the harmonization of medico-legal autopsy rules (2000) Forensic Sci Int 111:5-58Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadia Fucci
    • 1
  • Carlo P. Campobasso
    • 2
  • L. Mastrogiuseppe
    • 3
  • C. Puccinelli
    • 4
  • S. Marcheggiani
    • 4
  • L. Mancini
    • 4
  • L. Marino
    • 5
  • V. L. Pascali
    • 6
  1. 1.Institute of Public Health, Section of Legal MedicineUniversità Cattolica S. CuoreRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Experimental MedicineUniversity “L. Vanvitelli” of CampaniaNaplesItaly
  3. 3.Servizio Veterinario—Dipartimento di PrevenzioneASREMCampobassoItaly
  4. 4.Environment and Health Department Istituto Superiore SanitàRomeItaly
  5. 5.Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e MoliseTeramoItaly
  6. 6.Institute of Public Health, Section of Legal MedicineUniversità Cattolica S.CuoreRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations