International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 130, Issue 4, pp 1089–1099 | Cite as

Performance of post-mortem CT compared to autopsy in children

  • Beatriz V. Krentz
  • Leonor Alamo
  • Jochen Grimm
  • Fabrice Dédouit
  • Christine Bruguier
  • Christine Chevallier
  • Coraline Egger
  • Luiz F. F. Da Silva
  • Silke Grabherr
Original Article



Radiological techniques such as non-enhanced post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) play an increasingly important role in death investigations, especially in cases of non-medicolegal context of death, where the consent of the next of kin is required to perform autopsy. Such consent is often difficult to obtain for deceased children, and radiological methods may be an acceptable alternative. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance of PMCT explorations compared to medicolegal conventional autopsies in children and its potential usefulness in non-medicolegal situations.


We retrospectively reviewed a group of 26 children aged 0–12 years who died of different causes, which were investigated by both conventional autopsy and PMCT. We compared the findings extracted from radiological and autopsy reports. All findings were grouped according to their importance with respect to cause of death and to the anatomical structure they covered: organs, vascular system, soft tissue, and skeletal system.


A significantly larger number of findings were detected by autopsy compared to PMCT. Autopsy proved to be superior to PMCT, notably at detecting organ, soft tissue, and vascular findings, while PMCT was superior at detecting bone findings. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the methods concerning the essential findings used to define the cause of death.


In children, PMCT was less sensitive than conventional autopsy for detecting general findings. However, most essential findings were detected by both methods. PMCT was superior to autopsy for the detection of bone lesions in children.

Advances in knowledge

Up to today, very rare literature exists concerning PMCT in children, especially in a forensic setting. This article investigates the advantages and limitations of PMCT compared to autopsy in a unique study group and discusses possibilities for future developments.


Forensic imaging Post-mortem CT Forensic radiology Pediatric imaging 



The authors thank the radiographers, technicians, and doctors of the University Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne—Geneva and the Department of Pathology and the Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, who dedicated their efforts to conducting this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding information

One of the authors (SG) has a personal research grant from the Fondation Leenards (Lausanne, Switzerland).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Financial disclosures

•The first author (Silke Grabherr) has a personal academic funding from the Fondation Leenards, Lausanne, Switzerland since April 2011.


  1. 1.
    Thayyil S, Chitty LS, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ (2010) Minimally invasive fetal postmortem examination using magnetic resonance imaging and computerised tomography: current evidence and practical issues. Prenat Diagn 30(8):713–718. doi: 10.1002/pd.2534 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, Wade A, Olsen O, Gunny RS, Offiah A, Saunders DE, Owens CM, Chong WK, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM (2011) Post mortem magnetic resonance imaging in the fetus, infant and child: a comparative study with conventional autopsy (MaRIAS Protocol). BMC Pediatr 11:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-120 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buck U, Naether S, Braun M, Bolliger S, Friederich H, Jackowski C, Aghayev E, Christe A, Vock P, Dirnhofer R, Thali MJ (2007) Application of 3D documentation and geometric reconstruction methods in traffic accident analysis: with high resolution surface scanning, radiological MSCT/MRI scanning and real data based animation. Forensic Sci Int 170(1):20–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benali L, Gromb S, Bou C (2013) Post-mortem imaging in traffic fatalities: from autopsy to reconstruction of the scene using freely available software. Int J Legal Med 127(5):1045–1049. doi: 10.1007/s00414-012-0789-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leth PM, Struckmann H, Lauritsen J (2013) Interobserver agreement of the injury diagnoses obtained by postmortem computed tomography of traffic fatality victims and a comparison with autopsy results. Forensic Sci Int 225(1-3):15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Palmiere C, Doenz F, Bize P, Chevallier C, Mangin P, Grabherr S (2012) Detection of hemorrhage source: the diagnostic value of post-mortem CT-angiography. Forensic Sci Int 222(1-3):33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.04.031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mokrane FZ, Savall F, Rérolle C, Blanc A, Saint Martin P, Rousseau H, Rougé D, Telmon N, Dedouit F (2014) The usefulness of post-mortem CT angiography in injuries caused by falling from considerable heights: three fatal cases. Diagn Interv Imaging 95(11):1085–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grabherr S, Cooper C, Ulrich-Bochsler S, Uldin T, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Bolliger S, Christe A, Schnyder P, Mangin P, Thali MJ (2009) Estimation of sex and age of “virtual skeletons”—a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 19(2):419–429. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1155-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wittschieber D, Vieth V, Wierer T, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A (2013) Cameriere’s approach modified for pelvic radiographs: a novel method to assess apophyseal iliac crest ossification for the purpose of forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med 127(4):825–829. doi: 10.1007/s00414-013-0832-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thali MJ, Yen K, Vock P, Ozdoba C, Kneubuehl BP, Sonnenschein M, Dirnhofer R (2003) Image-guided virtual autopsy findings of gunshot victims performed with multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent correlation between radiology and autopsy finding. Forensic Sci Int 138(1-3):8–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cecchetto G, Amagliani A, Giraudo C, Fais P, Cavarzeran F, Montisci M, Feltrin G, Viel G, Ferrara SD (2012) Micro CT detection of gunshot residue in fresh and decomposed firearm wounds. Int J Legal Med 126(3):377–383. doi: 10.1007/s00414-011-0648-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cecchetto G, Giraudo C, Amagliani A, Viel G, Fais P, Cavarzeran F, Feltrin G, Ferrara SD, Montisci M (2010) Estimation of the firing distance through micro-CT analysis of gunshot wounds. Int J Legal Med 125(2):245–251. doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0533-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruder TD, Ross S, Preiss U, Thali MJ (2010) Minimally invasive post-mortem CT-angiography in a case involving a gunshot wound. Legal Med (Tokyo) 12(3):154–156. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zerlauth JB, Doenz F, Dominguez A, Palmiere C, Uské A, Meuli R, Grabherr S (2013) Surgical interventions with fatal outcome: utility of multi-phase postmortem CT angiography. Forensic Sci Int 225(1-3):32–34. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.05.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clarot F, Proust B, Eurin D, Vaz E, Le Dosseur P (2007) Sudden infant death syndrome and virtual autopsy: scalpel or mouse? Arch Pediatr 14(6):636–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Daly B, Abboud S, Ali Z, Sliker C, Fowler D (2013) Comparison of whole-body post mortem 3D CT and autopsy evaluation in accidental blunt force traumatic death using the abbreviated injury scale classification. Forensic Sci Int 225(1-3):20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thali MJ, Yen K, Schweitzer W, Vock P, Boesch C, Ozdoba C, Schroth G, Ith M, Sonnenschein M, Doernhoefer T, Scheurer E, Plattner T, Dirnhofer R (2003) Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—a feasibility study. J Forensic Sci 48(2):386–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roberts IS, Benamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee SH, Harris JN, Jackson A, Mallett S, Patankar T, Peebles C, Roobottom C, Traill ZC (2011) Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 379(9811):136–142. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61483-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Filograna L, Tartaglione T, Filograna E, Cittadini F, Oliva A, Pascali VL (2010) Computed tomography (CT) virtual autopsy and classical autopsy discrepancies: Radiologist’s error or a demonstration of post-mortem multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) limitation? Forensic Sci Int 195(1-3):e13–7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.11.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, Soerdjbalie-Maikoe V, de Bakker H, van Rijn RR (2014) Postmortem CT compared to autopsy in children; concordance in a forensic setting. Int J Legal 128(6):957–965. doi: 10.1007/s00414-014-0964-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Proisy M, Marchand AJ, Loget P, Bouvet R, Roussey M, Pelé F, Rozel C, Treguier C, Darnault P, Bruneau B (2013) Whole-body post-mortem computed tomography compared with autopsy in the investigation of unexpected death in infants and children. Eur Radiol 23(6):1711–17119. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2738-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cattaneo C, Marinelli E, Di Giancamillo A, Di Giancamillo M, Travetti O, Vigano L, Poppa P, Porta D, Gentilomo A, Grandi M, Poppa P, Porta D, Gentilomo A, Grandi M (2006) Sensitivity of autopsy and radiological examination in detecting bone fractures in an animal model: implications for the assessment of fatal child physical abuse. Forensic Sci Int 164(2-3):131–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brinkmann B (1999) Harmonization of medico-legal autopsy rules. Int J Legal Med 113(1):1–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weber MA, Klein NJ, Hartley JC, Lock PE, Malone M, Sebire NJ (2008) Infection and sudden unexpected death in infancy: a systematic retrospective case review. Lancet 371(9627):1848–1853. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60798-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Woźniak KJ, Moskała A, Kluza P, Romaszko K, Lopatin O, Rzepecka-Woźniak E (2015) Whole-body post-mortem computed tomography angiography of a newborn revealing transposition of great arteries. Int J Legal Med 129(6):1253–8. doi: 10.1007/s00414-015-1267-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scholing M, Saltzherr TP, Fung Kon Jin PH, Ponsen KJ, Reitsma JB, Lameris JS, Goslings JC (2009) The value of postmortem computed tomography as an alternative for autopsy in trauma victims: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 19(10):2333–2341. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1440-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chevallier C, Doenz F, Voucher P, Palmiere C, Dominguez A, Binaghi S, Mangin P, Grabherr S (2013) Postmortem computed tomography angiography vs. conventional autopsy: advantages and inconveniences of each method. Int J Legal Med 127(5):981–989. doi: 10.1007/s00414-012-0814-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aghayev E, Thali MJ, Sonnenschein M, Jackowski C, Dirnhofer R, Vock P (2007) Post-mortem tissue sampling using computed tomography guidance. Forensic Sci Int 166(2-3):199–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Noda Y, Yoshimura K, Tsuji S, Ohashi A, Kawasaki H, Kaneko K, Ikeda S, Kurokawa H, Tanigawa N (2013) Postmortem computed tomography imaging in the investigation of nontraumatic death in infants and children. Biomed Res Int 2013:327903. doi: 10.1155/2013/327903 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beatriz V. Krentz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Leonor Alamo
    • 3
  • Jochen Grimm
    • 1
    • 3
  • Fabrice Dédouit
    • 1
  • Christine Bruguier
    • 1
    • 3
  • Christine Chevallier
    • 1
    • 3
  • Coraline Egger
    • 1
  • Luiz F. F. Da Silva
    • 2
  • Silke Grabherr
    • 1
  1. 1.University Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-GenevaUniversity Hospital of LausanneLausanne 25Switzerland
  2. 2.Department of PathologyFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity Hospital of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations