Age and sex estimation is crucial in forensic investigations, whether in legal situations that involve living people or to identify mortal remains. The aim of this study was to establish reference values in a Brazilian population to estimate age and sex by measuring the length of the mandibular ramus on lateral cephalometric radiographs, and to determine the probability that an individual being is 18 years or older, based on the results that were obtained. Two hundred and eighteen scanned lateral cephalograms of individuals between 6 and 20 years of age (101 males and 117 females) were measured with reference to mandibular ramus length (the distance between Condylion superior (Cs) and Gonion (Go)) using ImageJ 1.41 software (NIH, Bethesda, MA, USA). The results showed that sexual dimorphism was not observed until 16 years and, based on the ramus length measurements in this sample, it is possible to predict sex with an accuracy of only 54 %. There was a positive correlation between age and ramus length (r = 0.90; p < 0.001). From the linear regression analysis, one formula was derived; therefore, it was possible to calculate the individual’s age, given his or her ramus length. The results showed that if an individual’s ramus length is 7.0 cm or more, then there is an 81.25 % chance that the individual is 18 years old or older. In conclusion, the mandibular ramus length was not effective in discriminating sex. Mandibular length is strongly related to chronological age and can be used to predict whether an individual is 18 years or older with high degree of expected accuracy.
Cephalometry Radiography Bone age measurement Forensic science Sex determination by skeleton
We declare that the experiments done in this manuscript comply with the current laws of Brazil.
Franklin D, Cardini A, O'Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I (2008) Mandibular morphology as an indicator of human subadult age: geometric morphometric approaches. Forensic science, medicine, and pathology 4(2):91–99. doi:10.1007/s12024-007-9015-7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso HF, Abrantes J, Humphrey LT (2013) Age estimation of immature human skeletal remains from the diaphyseal length of the long bones in the postnatal period. Int J Legal Med. doi:10.1007/s00414-013-0925-5Google Scholar
Schmidt S, Schiborr M, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A, Schulz R (2013) Sonographic examination of the apophysis of the iliac crest for forensic age estimation in living persons. Science & justice Journal of the Forensic Science Society 53(4):395–401. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2013.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittschieber D, Vieth V, Wierer T, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A (2013) Cameriere′s approach modified for pelvic radiographs: a novel method to assess apophyseal iliac crest ossification for the purpose of forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med 127(4):825–829. doi:10.1007/s00414-013-0832-9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittschieber D, Vieth V, Domnick C, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A (2013) The iliac crest in forensic age diagnostics: evaluation of the apophyseal ossification in conventional radiography. Int J Legal Med 127(2):473–479. doi:10.1007/s00414-012-0763-xPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mito T, Sato K, Mitani H (2002) Cervical vertebral bone age in girls. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 122(4):380–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai B, Krishan K, Kaur J, Anand SC (2008) Technical note: age estimation from mandible by lateral cephalogram: a preliminary study. The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology 26(1):24–28PubMedGoogle Scholar