Development of a skull/brain model for military wound ballistics studies
- 596 Downloads
Reports on penetrating ballistic head injuries in the literature are dominated by case studies of suicides; the penetrating ammunition usually being .22 rimfire or shotgun. The dominating cause of injuries in modern warfare is fragmentation and hence, this is the primary threat that military helmets protect the brain from. When helmets are perforated, this is usually by bullets. In combat, 20 % of penetrating injuries occur to the head and its wounding accounts for 50 % of combat deaths. A number of head simulants are described in the academic literature, in ballistic test methods for helmets (including measurement of behind helmet blunt trauma, BHBT) and in the ‘open’ and ‘closed’ government literature of several nations. The majority of these models are not anatomically correct and are not assessed with high-velocity rifle ammunition. In this article, an anatomically correct ‘skull’ (manufactured from polyurethane) and ‘brain’ (manufactured from 10 %, by mass, gelatine) model for use in military wound ballistic studies is described. Filling the cranium completely with gelatine resulted in a similar ‘skull’ fracture pattern as an anatomically correct ‘brain’ combined with a representation of cerebrospinal fluid. In particular, posterior cranial fossa and occipital fractures and brain ejection were observed. This pattern of injury compared favourably to reported case studies of actual incidents in the literature.
KeywordsHelmet High velocity Bullet Rifle Penetrating
A-CL acknowledges an equipment grant from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Miss E. Girvan (Otago Centre for Electron Microscopy) assisted with the EDS analysis. This work was internally funded by The Impact and Armour Group at Cranfield University.
- 6.Baxter D, Wilson M (2012) The fundamentals of head injury. Neurosurgery 30(3):116–121Google Scholar
- 18.Eskridge SL, Macera CA, Galarneau MR, Holbrrok TL, Woodruff SI, MacGregor AJ, Morton D, Sahaffer RA (2012) Injuries from combat explosions in Iraq: injury type, location, and severity. Injury 43(1678–1682)Google Scholar
- 19.Lewis EA Between Iraq and a hard plate: recent developments in UK military personal armour. In: IPAC (ed) Personal Armour Systems Symposium 2006 (PASS2006), The Royal Armouries, Leeds, UK, 18–22 September 2006Google Scholar
- 21.Sturdivan LM, Bexon R (1981) A mathematical model of the probability of perforation of the human skull by a ballistic projectile. Chemical Systems Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MarylandGoogle Scholar
- 27.Mabbott A, Carr DJ, Champion S, Malbon C, C T Comparison of 10 % gelatine, 20 % gelatine and Perma-Gel for ballistic testing. In: International Symposium on Ballistics, Freiberg, Germany, 22–26 April 2013Google Scholar