International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 128, Issue 6, pp 905–911 | Cite as

Magnetic bead-based separation of sperm from buccal epithelial cells using a monoclonal antibody against MOSPD3

  • Xue-Bo Li
  • Qing-Shan Wang
  • Yu Feng
  • Shu-Hua Ning
  • Yuan-Ying Miao
  • Ye-Quan Wang
  • Hong-Wei LiEmail author
Original Article


Forensic DNA analysis of sexual assault evidence requires unambiguous differentiation of DNA profiles in mixed samples. To investigate the feasibility of magnetic bead-based separation of sperm from cell mixtures using a monoclonal antibody against MOSPD3 (motile sperm domain-containing protein 3), 30 cell samples were prepared by mixing 104 female buccal epithelial cells with sperm cells of varying densities (103, 104, or 105 cells/mL). Western blot and immunofluorescence assays showed that MOSPD3 was detectable on the membrane of sperm cells, but not in buccal epithelial cells. After biotinylated MOSPD3 antibody was incubated successively with the prepared cell mixtures and avidin-coated magnetic beads, microscopic observation revealed that each sperm cell was bound by two or more magnetic beads, in the head, neck, mid-piece, or flagellum. A full single-source short tandem repeat profile could be obtained in 80 % of mixed samples containing 103 sperm cells/mL and in all samples containing ≥104 sperm cells/mL. For dried vaginal swab specimens, the rate of successful detection was 100 % in both flocked and cotton swabs preserved for 1 day, 87.5 % in flocked swabs and 40 % in cotton swabs preserved for 3 days, and 40 % in flocked swabs and 16.67 % in cotton swabs preserved for 10 days. Our findings suggest that immunomagnetic bead-based separation is potentially a promising alternative to conventional methods for isolating sperm cells from mixed forensic samples.


MOSPD3 Immunomagnetic beads Sperm Short tandem repeat profile Forensic DNA analysis 



This work was supported by a grant (No. 2011ZDYJCQSJ006) from the Ministry of Public Security of China. We thank Professor Anne Raffauf for her kind help.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Gill P, Jeffreys AJ, Werrett DJ (1985) Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints’. Nature 318(6046):577–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yoshida K, Sekiguchi K, Mizuno N, Kasai K, Sakai I, Sato H, Seta S (1995) The modified method of two-step differential extraction of sperm and vaginal epithelial cell DNA from vaginal fluid mixed with semen. Forensic Sci Int 72(1):25–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schulz MM, Buschner MG, Leidig R, Wehner HD, Fritz P, Habig K, Bonin M, Schutz M, Shiozawa T, Wehner F (2010) A new approach to the investigation of sexual offenses-cytoskeleton analysis reveals the origin of cells found on forensic swabs. J Forensic Sci 55(2):492–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vandewoestyne M, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Van Hoofstat D, Deforce D (2012) Evaluation of three DNA extraction protocols for forensic STR typing after laser capture microdissection. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6(2):258–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Budimlija ZM, Lechpammer M, Popiolek D, Fogt F, Prinz M, Bieber FR (2005) Forensic applications of laser capture microdissection: use in DNA-based parentage testing and platform validation. Croat Med J 46(4):549–555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horsman KM, Barker SL, Ferrance JP, Forrest KA, Koen KA, Landers JP (2005) Separation of sperm and epithelial cells in a microfabricated device: potential application to forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence. Anal Chem 77(3):742–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen J, Kobilinsky L, Wolosin D, Shaler R, Baum H (1998) A physical method for separating spermatozoa from epithelial cells in sexual assault evidence. J Forensic Sci 43(1):114–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hanson EK, Ballantyne J (2004) A highly discriminating 21 locus Y-STR “megaplex” system designed to augment the minimal haplotype loci for forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 49(1):40–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cerri N, Ricci U, Sani I, Verzeletti A, De Ferrari F (2003) Mixed stains from sexual assault cases: autosomal or Y-chromosome short tandem repeats? Croat Med J 44(3):289–292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garvin AM, Bottinelli M, Gola M, Conti A, Soldati G (2009) DNA preparation from sexual assault cases by selective degradation of contaminating DNA from the victim. J Forensic Sci 54(6):1297–1303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coulais D, Panterne C, Fonteneau JF, Gregoire M (2012) Purification of circulating plasmacytoid dendritic cells using counterflow centrifugal elutriation and immunomagnetic beads. Cytotherapy 14(7):887–896PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bjerke T, Nielsen S, Helgestad J, Nielsen BW, Schiotz PO (1993) Purification of human blood basophils by negative selection using immunomagnetic beads. J Immunol Methods 157(1–2):49–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anslinger K, Bayer B, Danilov SM, Metzger R (2008) Application of sperm-specific antibodies for the separation of sperm from cell mixtures. Forensic Science Int Genet Supplement Series 1(1):394–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marshall P (2002) Optimization of spermatozoa capture during the differential extraction process for STR typing with the potential for automation. University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort WorthGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buerger K (2010) Functional analysis of the mospd gene family. The University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thaler R, Rumpler M, Spitzer S, Klaushofer K, Varga F (2011) Mospd1, a new player in mesenchymal versus epidermal cell differentiation. J Cell Physiol 226(10):2505–2515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pall GS, Wallis J, Axton R, Brownstein DG, Gautier P, Buerger K, Mulford C, Mullins JJ, Forrester LM (2004) A novel transmembrane MSP-containing protein that plays a role in right ventricle development. Genomics 84(6):1051–1059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lei JH, Guan F, Xu H, Chen L, Su BT, Zhou Y, Wang T, Li YL, Liu WQ (2012) Application of an immunomagnetic bead ELISA based on IgY for detection of circulating antigen in urine of mice infected with Schistosoma japonicum. Vet Parasitol 187(1–2):196–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kohn FM, Dammshauser I, Neukamm C, Renneberg H, Siems WE, Schill WB, Aumuller G (1998) Ultrastructural localization of angiotensin-converting enzyme in ejaculated human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 13(3):604–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lesaicherre ML, Uttamchandani M, Chen GY, Yao SQ (2002) Developing site-specific immobilization strategies of peptides in a microarray. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 12(16):2079–2083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Langer K, Coester C, Weber C, von Briesen H, Kreuter J (2000) Preparation of avidin-labeled protein nanoparticles as carriers for biotinylated peptide nucleic acid. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 49(3):303–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Greenspoon SA, Ban JD, Sykes K, Ballard EJ, Edler SS, Baisden M, Covington BL (2004) Application of the BioMek 2000 laboratory automation workstation and the DNA IQ System to the extraction of forensic casework samples. J Forensic Sci 49(1):29–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Swan SH, Elkin EP, Fenster L (2000) The question of declining sperm density revisited: an analysis of 101 studies published 1934–1996. Environ Health Perspect 108(10):961–966PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Patankar SS, Kaore SB, Sawane MV, Mishra NV, Deshkar AM (2007) Effect of clomiphene citrate on sperm density in male partners of infertile couples. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 51(2):195–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benschop CCG, Wiebosch DC, Kloosterman AD, Sijen T (2010) Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing. Forensic Sci Int Genet 4(2):115–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wascher RA, Huynh KT, Giuliano AE, Hansen NM, Singer FR, Elashoff D, Hoon DS (2003) Stanniocalcin-1: a novel molecular blood and bone marrow marker for human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9(4):1427–1435PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xue-Bo Li
    • 1
  • Qing-Shan Wang
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yu Feng
    • 2
    • 3
  • Shu-Hua Ning
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yuan-Ying Miao
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ye-Quan Wang
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hong-Wei Li
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Evidence Identification in Universities of Shandong ProvinceShandong University of Political Science and LawJinanChina
  2. 2.Institute of Forensic ScienceChongqing Public Security BureauChongqingChina
  3. 3.Chongqing Engineering Research Center for Criminal Investigation TechnologyChongqingChina
  4. 4.Institute of Forensic ScienceChongqing Public Security BureauChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations