International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 127, Issue 4, pp 831–838 | Cite as

Age dependence of epiphyseal ossification of the distal radius in ultrasound diagnostics

  • S. Schmidt
  • M. Schiborr
  • H. Pfeiffer
  • A. Schmeling
  • R. Schulz
Original Article

Abstract

By determining the ossification stage of the distal radial epiphysis, it is possible to gain important information to help clarify the question of whether various legally relevant age limits have been exceeded. Any examination of the hand by means of projection radiography such as that used in conventional skeletal age diagnostics is strictly regulated for reasons of radiation hygiene. In many areas of the law, there are no basic legal provisions authorising the performance of X-ray examinations. The present study examines the applicability of ultrasound diagnostics in assessing ossification processes in the distal radius. To this end, the ossification stages of the distal radial epiphysis were determined in 306 female and 309 male study participants aged between 10 and 25 years. In the female gender, ossification stage III was determined at an age of 13.4 years at the earliest, and ossification stage IV at 15.0 years at the earliest. In the male gender, ossification stage III was not observed until 14.3 years, and ossification stage IV not until 15.2 years. In the practice of forensic age estimation in living persons, sonographic examination of the distal radius in areas of application with no legal basis for authorising X-ray examinations makes it possible to improve the accuracy of age diagnosis by including criteria of skeletal maturation. In view of the existing legislative basis for the use of X-rays on human subjects, the exposure of individuals to radiation can be minimised.

Keywords

Forensic age estimation Skeletal age Radius Sonography 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by a grant from the “Innovative Medical Research” (IMF) programme of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Münster (SC 1 2 07 18).

References

  1. 1.
    Baumann U, Schulz R, Heinecke A, Schmeling A, Schmidt S (2009) Reference study on the time frame for ossification of the distal radius and ulnar epiphysis on the hand radiograph. Forensic Sci Int 191:15–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernhard W (1988) Reifungsdiagnose an Lebenden. In: Knußmann R (ed) Wesen und Methoden der Anthropologie, 1. Teil, Wissenschaftstheorie, Geschichte, morphologische Methoden. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braselmann A (1974) Die Bestimmung des Knochenalters am kindlichen Ellenbogengelenk – Studie an 408 Kindern im Vergleich mit der Handwurzelossifikation. Dissertation, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cameriere R, de Luca S, de Angelis D, Merelli V, Giuliodori A, Cingolani M, Cattaneo C, Ferrante L (2012) Reliability of Schmeling’s stages of ossification of medial clavicular epiphyses and its validity to assess 18 years of age in living subjects. Int J Legal Med 126:923–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cameriere R, de Luca S, Biagi R, Cingolani M, Farronato G, Ferrante L (2012) Accuracy of three age estimation methods in children by measurements of developing teeth and carpals and epiphyses of the ulna and radius. J Forensic Sci 57:1263–1270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dünkel F, Grzywa J, Horsfield P, Pruin I (2010) Juvenile justice systems in Europe. Forum, GodesbergGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dvorak J, George J, Junge A, Hodler J (2007) Age determination by magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in adolescent male football players. Br J Sports Med 41:45–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dvorak J, George J, Junge A, Hodler J (2007) Application of MRI of the wrist for age determination in international U-17 soccer competitions. Br J Sports Med 41:497–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dvorak J (2009) Detecting over-age players using wrist MRI: science partnering with sport to ensure fair play. Br J Sports Med 43:884–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gefferth K (1970) Ein Verfahren zur Bestimmung des biologischen Knochenalters. Acta Paediatr Acad Sci Hung 11:59–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grashey R, Birkner R (1964) Atlas typischer Röntgenbilder vom normalen Menschen. Urban & Schwarzenberg, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hansman CF, Maresh MM (1961) A longitudinal study of skeletal maturation. Am J Dis Child 101:305–321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan KM, Miller BS, Hoggard E, Somani A, Sarafoglou K (2009) Application of ultrasound for bone age estimation in clinical practice. J Pediatr 154:243–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knussmann R (1996) Vergleichende Biologie des Menschen, Lehrbuch der Anthropologie und Humangenetik. Fischer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lockemann U, Fuhrmann A, Püschel K, Schmeling A, Geserick G (2004) Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Forensische Altersdiagnostik der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rechtsmedizin: Empfehlungen für die Altersdiagnostik bei Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen außerhalb des Strafverfahrens. Rechtsmedizin 14:123–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olze A, Hertel J, Schulz R, Schmeling A (2012) Altersabhängigkeit der Sekundärdentinanlagerung im Pulpencavum. Orthopantomogrammstudie. Rechtsmedizin 22:374–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Olze A, Hertel J, Schulz R, Wierer T, Schmeling A (2012) Radiographic evaluation of Gustafson’s criteria for the purpose of forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med 126:615–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olze A, van Niekerk P, Schulz R, Ribbecke S, Schmeling A (2012) The influence of impaction on the rate of third molar mineralisation in male Black Africans. Int J Legal Med 126:869–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pelech L, Pechstein J (1976) Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung des Skelettalters bei tschechischen und süddeutschen Kindern. Arztl Jugendkd 67:23–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pelsmaekers B, Loos R, Carels C, Derom C, Vlietinck R (1997) The genetic contribution to dental maturation. J Dent Res 76:1337–1340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Quirmbach F, Ramsthaler F, Verhoff MA (2009) Evaluation of the ossification of the medial clavicular epiphysis with a digital ultrasonic system to determine the age threshold of 21 years. Int J Legal Med 123:241–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Thissen D (1988) Assessing the skeletal maturity of the hand-wrist: Fels method. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roche AF, French NY (1970) Differences in skeletal maturity levels between the knee and hand. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 109:307–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rösing FW (2000) Forensische Altersdiagnose: Statistik, Arbeitsregeln und Darstellung. In: Oehmichen M, Geserick G (eds) Osteologische Identifikation (Research in Legal Medicine/Rechtsmedizinische Forschungsergebnisse). Schmidt-Römhild, LübeckGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Santoro V, Roca R, Donno A de, Fiandaca C, Pinto G, Tafuri S, Introna F (2012) Applicability of Greulich and Pyle and Demirijan aging methods to sample of Italian population. Forensic Sci Int 221(1–3):153.e1–153.e5Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A, Kaatsch HJ, Knell B, Ramsthaler F, Reisinger W, Riepert T, Ritz-Timme S, Rösing FW, Rötzscher K, Geserick G (2008) Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 122:457–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Loreck D, Vendura K, Markus W, Geserick G (2000) Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation—consequences for forensic age estimations. Int J Legal Med 113:253–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schmeling A, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Mühler M, Wernecke K-D, Geserick G (2004) Studies on the time frame for ossification of medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage in conventional radiography. Int J Legal Med 118:5–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schmid F, Moll H (1960) Atlas der normalen und pathologischen Handskelettentwicklung. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schmidt S, Baumann U, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Schmeling A (2008) A Study of age dependence of epiphyseal ossification of the hand skeleton. Int J Legal Med 122:51–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schmidt S, Koch B, Mühler M, Reisinger W, Schmeling A (2007) Optimizing the Thiemann-Nitz method for skeletal age determination for forensic age diagnostics in live subjects. Scand J Forensic Sci 13:5–7Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schmidt S, Koch B, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Schmeling A (2007) Comparative analysis of the applicability of the skeletal age determination methods of Greulich-Pyle and Thiemann-Nitz for forensic age estimation in living subjects. Int J Legal Med 121:293–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schmidt S, Koch B, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Schmeling A (2008) Studies in use of the Greulich-Pyle skeletal age method to assess criminal liability. Leg med (Tokyo) 10:190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schmidt S, Mühler M, Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Schulz R (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the clavicular ossification. Int J Legal Med 121:321–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schmidt S, Nitz I, Schulz R, Schmeling A (2008) Applicability of the skeletal age determination method of Tanner and Whitehouse for forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med 122:309–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schmidt S, Nitz I, Schulz R, Tsokos M, Schmeling A (2009) The digital atlas of skeletal maturity by Gilsanz and Ratib: a suitable alternative for age estimation of living individuals in criminal proceedings? Int J Legal Med 123:489–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schmidt S, Schmeling A, Zwiesigk P, Pfeiffer H, Schulz R (2011) Sonographic evaluation of apophyseal ossification of the iliac crest in forensic age diagnostics in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 125:271–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schmidt S, Schmeling A, Zwiesigk P, Schiborr M, Pfeiffer H, Schulz R (2011) Ultrasound studies on age dependency of epiphyseal ossification of the distal radius. Scand J Forensic Sci 17:17–20Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schulz R, Zwiesigk P, Schiborr M, Schmidt S, Schmeling A (2008) Ultrasound studies on the time course of clavicular ossification. Int J Legal Med 122:163–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    de Sousa F, Schuster W (1975) Bestimmung des Knochenalters. Kinderarzt 6:421–428Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Healy MJR (1962) A new system for estimating skeletal maturity from the hand and wrist with standard derived from a study of 2600 healthy British children. Part II. The scoring system. Int Child Centre, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thiemann H-H, Nitz I, Schmeling A (2006) Röntgenatlas der normalen Hand im Kindesalter. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tisè M, Mazzarini L, Fabrizzi G, Ferrante L, Giorgetti R, Tagliabracci A (2011) Applicability of Greulich and Pyle method for age assessment in forensic practice on an Italian sample. Int J Legal Med 125:411–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Schmidt
    • 1
  • M. Schiborr
    • 2
  • H. Pfeiffer
    • 1
  • A. Schmeling
    • 1
  • R. Schulz
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Legal MedicineUniversity Hospital MünsterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Clinical RadiologyUniversity Hospital MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations