Differentiation at autopsy between in vivo gas embolism and putrefaction using gas composition analysis
- 385 Downloads
Gas embolism can arise from different causes (iatrogenic accidents, criminal interventions, or diving related accidents). Gas analyses have been shown to be a valid technique to differentiate between putrefaction gases and gas embolism. In this study, we performed systematic necropsies at different postmortem times in three experimental New Zealand White Rabbits models: control or putrefaction, infused air embolism, and compression/decompression. The purpose of this study was to look for qualitative and quantitative differences among groups and to observe how putrefaction gases mask in vivo gas embolism. We found that the infused air embolism and compression/decompression models had a similar gas composition prior to 27-h postmortem, being typically composed of around 70–80 % of N2 and 20–30 % of CO2, although unexpected higher CO2 concentrations were found in some decompressed animals, putting in question the role of CO2 in decompression. All these samples were statistically and significantly different from more decomposed samples. Gas composition of samples from more decomposed animals and from the putrefaction model presented hydrogen, which was therefore considered as a putrefaction marker.
KeywordsPutrefaction Gas embolism Decompression Gas composition Nitrogen
The authors would like to thank all colleagues from the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain) who contributed to this work and to the hyperbaric medicine division of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (Norway) for its scientific contribution. We would also like to thank Dr. Jose Luis Martín Barrasa for his help during the animal experiments at the Unit of Research of the Negrín Hospital in Spain. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation with two research projects, (AGL 2005-07947) and (CGL 2009/12663), as well as the Government of Canary Islands (DG Medio Natural). The Spanish Ministry of Education contributed with personal financial support (the University Professor Formation fellowship). The Central Norway Regional Health Authority and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology supported additionally the hyperbaric experiment. Finally, The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Marine Mammal Centre and Wick and Sloan Simmons provided funding for the latest stage of this work.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
The study was performed in accordance with all EU applicable laws, regulations, and standards, obtaining the corresponding approval from the different ethical committees.
- 2.Knight B (1996) Forensic pathology. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 3.Hamilton RW, Thalmann ED (2003) Decompression practice. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS (eds) Bennett and Elliott's physiology and medicine of diving. Saunders, pp 455-500Google Scholar
- 5.Pierucci G (1985) The post-mortem diagnosis of gas embolism. Pathologica (Genoa) 77(1048):145–156Google Scholar
- 6.Richter M (1905) Gerichtsärztliche Diagnostik und Technik. S. Hirzel, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kuiken T, García-Hartmann M Dissection techniques and tissues sampling. In: Newsletter (ed) 1st European cetacean society workshop on cetacean pathology, Leiden, Netherlands, 1991Google Scholar
- 12.Bert P (1878) La Pression Barometrique: Recherches de Physiologie Expérimentale. (Barometric pressure: researches in experimental physiology) (trans: Hitchcock MA, Hitchcock FA). Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lawrence C (1997) Interpretation of gas in diving autopsies. S Pac Underw Med Soc J 27(4):228–230Google Scholar
- 15.Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of Statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Springer series in statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
- 17.R-Develpment-Core-Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
- 19.Smith-Sivertsen J The origin of intravascular bubbles produced by decompression of rats killed prior to hypebaric exposure. In: Lambertsen CJ (ed) Proceedings of the fifth symposium on underwater physiology, Washington, DC, 1976. Bethesda MD, pp 303-309Google Scholar
- 20.Ishiyama A, Mano Y, Shibayama M, Maeda H (1981) Analysis of gas composition of dysbaric decompressed bubble. In: Miller JW (ed) The sixth meeting of the panel on diving physiology and technology. The United States–Japan Cooperative Program in Natural Resources, California, U.S.A., pp 201-210Google Scholar
- 22.Armstrong HG (1939) Analysis of gas emboli. Engineering Section Memorandum Report. Wright Field, OhioGoogle Scholar
- 24.Behnke AR (1951) Decompression sickness following exposure to high pressures. In: Fulton JF (ed) Decompression sickness. Saunders, Phyladelphia, pp 53-89Google Scholar
- 25.Berghage TE, Keating LJ, Wooley JM (1978) Decompression sickness in rats and mice rapidly decompressed after breathing various concentrations of carbon dioxide. In: Lambertsen CJ (ed) Proceedings of the sixth underwater physiology symposium, vol 6. Bethesda, pp. 485–496Google Scholar
- 26.Harvey EN (1945) Decompression sickness and bubble fromation in blood and tissues. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 21:505–536Google Scholar
- 27.Guyton AC (1981) Physical principles of gaseous exchange; diffusion of oxygen and carbon dioxide through the respiratory membrane. In: Textbook of medical physiology. 6th edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 491-503Google Scholar
- 29.Chappell MA, Payne SJ (2006) A physiological model of gas pockets in crevices and their behavior under compression. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 152(1):100–114. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2005.07.010
- 30.Francis TJR, Simon JM (2003) Pathology of Decompression Sickness. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS (eds) Bennett and Elliott's physiology and medicine of diving. Saunders, pp 530-556Google Scholar
- 31.Davies JM (1983) Studies on bubble formation after decompression: with special reference to the development and testing of the integrating ultrasonic pulse-echo imaging system for bubble detection. University of Oxford, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 32.Blatteau JE, Souraud JB, Gempp E, Boussuges A (2006) Gas nuclei, their origin, and their role in bubble formation. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 77:1068–1076Google Scholar