International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 127, Issue 1, pp 213–223 | Cite as

Strengthen forensic entomology in court—the need for data exploration and the validation of a generalised additive mixed model

Original Article

Abstract

Developmental data of juvenile blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) are typically used to calculate the age of immature stages found on or around a corpse and thus to estimate a minimum post-mortem interval (PMImin). However, many of those data sets don't take into account that immature blow flies grow in a non-linear fashion. Linear models do not supply a sufficient reliability on age estimates and may even lead to an erroneous determination of the PMImin. According to the Daubert standard and the need for improvements in forensic science, new statistic tools like smoothing methods and mixed models allow the modelling of non-linear relationships and expand the field of statistical analyses. The present study introduces into the background and application of these statistical techniques by analysing a model which describes the development of the forensically important blow fly Calliphora vicina at different temperatures. The comparison of three statistical methods (linear regression, generalised additive modelling and generalised additive mixed modelling) clearly demonstrates that only the latter provided regression parameters that reflect the data adequately. We focus explicitly on both the exploration of the data—to assure their quality and to show the importance of checking it carefully prior to conducting the statistical tests—and the validation of the resulting models. Hence, we present a common method for evaluating and testing forensic entomological data sets by using for the first time generalised additive mixed models.

Keywords

Forensic entomology Statistics Calliphora vicina Generalised additive model Mixed effects model 

References

  1. 1.
    Adams ZJO, Hall MJR (2003) Methods used for the killing and preservation of blow fly larvae, and their effect on post-mortem larval length. Forensic Sci Int 138:50–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amendt J, Campobasso CP, Gaudry E, Reiter C, LeBlanc HN, Hall MJR (2007) Best practice in forensic entomology—standards and guidelines. Int J Leg Med 121:90–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amendt J, Goff ML, Grassberger M, Campobasso CP (2010) Current concepts in forensic entomology. Novel arthropods, environments and geographical regions. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ames C, Turner B (2003) Low temperature episodes in development of blow flies: implications for postmortem interval estimation. Med Vet Entomol 17:178–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson GS (2000) Minimum and maximum development rates of some forensically important Calliphoridae (Diptera). J Forensic Sci 45:824–832PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chaves LF (2010) An entomologist guide to demistify pseudoreplication: data analysis of field studies with design constraints. J Med Entomol 47:291–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cleveland WS (1993) Visualizing Data. Hobart Press, Summit, New Jersey, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donovan SE, Hall MJR, Turner BD, Moncrieff CB (2006) Larval growth rates of the blow fly, Calliphora vicina, over a range of temperatures. Med Vet Entomol 20:106–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Faraway JJ (2006) Extending the linear model with R. Generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greenberg B (1991) Flies as forensic indicators. J Med Entomol 28:565–577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heffner RA, Butler MJ IV, Reilly CK (1996) Pseudoreplication revisited. Ecology 77:2558–2562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Higley LG, Haskell NH (2001) Insect development and forensic entomology. In: Byrd JJ, Castner JL (eds) The utility of arthropods in legal investigations. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 389–406Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ieno EN, Amendt J, Fremdt H, Saveliev AA, Zuur AF (2010) Analysing forensic entomological data using additive mixed effects modelling. In: Amendt J, Goff ML, Grassberger M, Campobasso CP (eds) Current concepts in forensic entomology. Novel arthropods, environments and geographical regions. Springer, New York, pp 139–162Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu SS, Zhang GM, Zhu J (1995) Influence of temperature variations on rate of development in insects: analysis of case studies from entomological literature. Ann Entomol Soc Am 88:107–119Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marchenko MI (2001) Medicolegal relevance of cadaver entomofauna for the determination of the time of death. Forensic Sci Int 120:89–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Michaud JP, Moreau G (2011) A statistical approach based on accumulated degree-days to predict decomposition-related processes in forensic studies. J Forensic Sci 56:229–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Richards CS, PatersonID VMH (2008) Estimating the age of immature Chrysomya albiceps (Diptera: Calliphoridae), correcting for temperature and geographical latitude. Int J Legal Med 122:271–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Richards CS, Villet MH (2008) Factors affecting accuracy and precision of thermal summation models of insect development used to estimate post-mortem intervals. Int J Legal Med 122:401–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Richards CS, Crous KL, Villet MH (2009) Models of development for blow fly sister species Chrysomya chloropyga and Chrysomya putoria. Med Vet Entomol 23:56–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tantawi TI, Greenberg B (1993) The effect of killing and preservative solutions on estimates of maggot age in forensic cases. J Forensic Sci 38:702–707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tarone AM, Foran DR (2008) Generalized additive models and Lucilia sericata growth: assessing confidence intervals and error rates in forensic entomology. J Forensic Sci 53:942–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Villet MH (2007) An inexpensive geometrical micrometer for measuring small, live insects quickly without harming them. Entomol Exp Appl 122:279–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wells JD, LaMotte LR (1995) Estimating maggot age from weight using inverse prediction. J Forensic Sci 40:585–590Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Smith GM (2007) Analysing ecological data. Springer, New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Forensic Medicine, Goethe-University FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations