When backyard fun turns to trauma: risk assessment of blunt ballistic impact trauma due to potato cannons
- First Online:
- 319 Downloads
Although potato cannons are an area of great interest among internet users, they are almost completely unknown in the medical community. These simple ballistic devices are made from plastic plumbing pipes and are powered with propellant gas from aerosol cans. By combustion of the gas–oxygen mixture, a high pressure is produced which propels the potato chunks through the barrel. It is the aim of this study to investigate the hazardous potential of these shooting devices. Test shots were performed using three illegally manufactured potato cannons that were confiscated by police authorities. Velocity, impulse, kinetic energy, and energy density were calculated. The risk of head and chest injuries was investigated by using Sturdivan's Blunt Criterion (BC), an energy based five parametric trauma model assessing the vulnerability to blunt weapons, projectile impacts, and behind-body-armor exposures. The probability of lethality due to blunt impact trauma to the chest was assessed using Sturdivan's lethality model. For potential head impacts, all test shots far exceeded the critical BC (head) value which corresponds to a 50% risk of skull fracture. The risk of injury with regard to chest impacts was similar. All but two test shots far exceeded the critical BC (chest) value corresponding to a 50% risk of sustaining a thoracic skeletal injury of Abbreviated Injury Scale 2 or 3. The probability of a lethal injury due to blunt chest impact was as high as 20%. To conclude, this work demonstrates that potato cannons should be considered dangerous weapons rather than as toys used by adventurous adolescents.
KeywordsTrauma biomechanics Blunt impact trauma Trauma model Blunt criterion Spud gun
- 1.Gurstelle W (2001) Backyard ballistics. Chicago Review Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). US Department of Justice Web site. http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/unlicensed-persons.html#potato-gun-classification. Accessed 13 November 2010
- 5.Franke E (1981) Ermittlung der Bewegungsenergie der Geschosse. In: Zobel KF (ed) PTB-Bericht W-19 Gesetzliche Munitionsprüfung. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig und Berlin, pp 27–31Google Scholar
- 6.Sellier K, Kneubuehl BP (1994) Wound ballistics and the scientific background. Elsevier Science B.V, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 8.Frank M, Bockholdt B, Peters D, Lange J, Grossjohann R, Ekkernkamp A, Hinz P (2010) Blunt Criterion trauma model for head and chest injury risk assessment of cal. 380 R and cal. 22 long blank cartridge actuated gundog retrieval devices. Forensic Sci Int. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.10.023 Google Scholar
- 9.Pignolet F, Guillion F, Duval-Beaupere G, Guezard B, Tarriere C (1990) In vivo measurement of human weight supported by the successive anatomical level from C4 to the femoral head, SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) Technical Paper 902306 13-21Google Scholar
- 15.Hoxha S, Elliott JE (1985) Simulation of area weapons effects (SAWE) safety criteria. US Army Armament Research and Development Center, DoverGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kneubuehl BP, Coupland RM, Rothschild MA, Thali MJ (2008) Wundballistik. Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- 20.European chemical Substances Information System (2000) IUCLID Chemical Data Sheet Butane. http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/esis/index.php?LANG=de&GENRE=CASNO&ENTREE=106-97-8. Accessed 13 November 2010.
- 21.European chemical Substances Information System (2000) IUCLID Chemical Data Sheet Propane. http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/esis/index.php?LANG=de&GENRE=CASNO&ENTREE=74-98-6. Accessed 13 November 2000.
- 22.Pierson HM, Price D (2005) The potato cannon. Determination of combustion principles for engineering freshmen. Chem Eng Ed 39:156–159Google Scholar