Accuracy of Cameriere, Haavikko, and Willems radiographic methods on age estimation on Bosnian–Herzegovian children age groups 6–13
- 505 Downloads
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare the accuracy of the Cameriere European formula (Cameriere), adopted Haavikko method from 1974 (Haavikko), and revisited Demirjian method by Willems (Willems) for age estimation on orthopantomograms (OPGs) of Bosnian–Herzegovian (BH) children age groups 6–13 years. The accuracy was determined as difference between estimated dental age (DA) and chronological age (CA) and the absolute accuracy (absolute difference) was assessed by analyzing OPGs of 591 girls and 498 boys. The Cameriere method overestimated the mean age by 0.09 year for girls and underestimated by −0.02 year for boys. The Haavikko method underestimated the mean age by −0.29 year for girls and −0.09 year for boys. The Willems method overestimated the mean age by 0.24 year in girls and by 0.42 year in boys. The absolute accuracies were 0.53 year for girls and 0.55 year for boys for Cameriere method; for Haavikko method, 0.59 year for girls and 0.62 year for boys; and for Willems method 0.69 year for girls and 0.67 year for boys. In conclusion, Cameriere method is the most accurate for estimating the age of BH children age groups 6–13 years using OPGs, following adopted Haavikko method and Willems method.
KeywordsForensic dentistry Age estimation Bosnia and Herzegovina Cameriere method Haavikko method Willems method
This research was supported by the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia; Grant No. 065-0650445-0423 (Human dentition in forensic and archeological researches) and Erasmus Mundus External Cooperation Window Project Basileus—Balkans Academic Scheme for the Internationalization of Learning in cooperation with EU universities.
- 3.Nolla C (1960) The development of the permanent teeth. ASDCJ Dent Child 27(14):254–266Google Scholar
- 5.Tanner J, Whitehouse R, Healy M (1962) A new system for estimating the maturity of the hand and wrist, with standards derived from 2600 healthy British children. Part II. The scoring system. International Children's Centre, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 11.Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Scarpino F, Ermenc B, Zeqiri B (2006) Dental age estimation of growing children: comparison among various European countries. Acta Stomatol Croat 40(2):256–262Google Scholar
- 19.Sarajlic N, Cihlarz Z (2007) Diverse stature estimation formulae applied to a Bosnian population. Bosnian J Basic Med Sci 7(2):136–139Google Scholar
- 23.Nuzzolese E, Biočina-Lukenda D, Janković S, Galić I, Prohić S (2009) Forenzički značaj stomatološke radiologije i strana tijela orofacijalnog područja (Importance of radiology in forensic dentistry and foreign bodies in orofacial region). In: Janković S (ed) Dentalna radiografija i radiologija. Medicinski fakultet u Splitu, Split, pp 221–236Google Scholar
- 24.Sarajlic N, Topic B, Brkic H, Alajbeg IZ (2009) Aging quantification on alveolar bone loss. Coll Anthropol 33(4):1165–1170Google Scholar
- 26.Solheim T, Vonen A, Kvaal S (2008) Odontological age estimation of living persons with special reference to young asylum seeker: the Norwegian approach. Acta Stomatol Croat 42(4):350–359Google Scholar
- 27.Galić I, Nakaš E, Prohić S, Selimović E, Obradović B, Petrovečki M (2010) Dental age estimation among children aged 5–14 years using the Demirjian method in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Acta Stomatol Croat 44(1):17–25Google Scholar