Advertisement

International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 121, Issue 6, pp 449–453 | Cite as

Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth: a European formula

  • Roberto Cameriere
  • Danilo De Angelis
  • Luigi Ferrante
  • Francesco Scarpino
  • Mariano Cingolani
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of the present paper was to improve and expand research with a larger number of children from various European countries and to provide a common formula useful for all these countries. Orthopantomographs taken from 2,652 European Caucasian children (1,382 boys, 1,270 girls) aged between 4 and 16 years were analyzed. The children came from Croatia, Germany, Kosovo, Italy, Slovenia, Spain, and the UK. Following the pilot study, subjects’ age was modeled as a function of gender (g), morphological variables (predictors) × 5(second premolar), s (sum of normalized open apices) N 0, and the first-order interaction between s and N 0. The results showed that all these variables contributed significantly to the fit, so that all were included in the regression model, yielding the following linear regression formula: Age = 8.387 + 0.282 g − 1.692 × 5 + 0.835 N 0 − 0.116 s − 0.139 s × N 0, where g is a variable, 1 for males and 0 for females. The equation explained 86.1% (R 2 = 0.861) of total deviance. The median of the residuals (=observed age minus predicted age) was −0.114 years, with (RefB.2) interquartile range = 1.22 years.

Keywords

Forensic science Age estimation Open apices Mineralization Multiple regression 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Bejtulla Zeqiri Department of Orthodontics, University of Prishtina, Kosovo; José L. Prieto, Laboratorio de Antropología y Odontología Forense, Instituto Anatómico Forense, Madrid, Spain; Hrvoje Brkic, School of Dental Medicine, Department of Dental Anthropology, University of Zagreb, Croatia; Brita Willershausen and Ioannis Moschos, Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltungskunde, Klinikum der Johannes Gutenberg, Universität Mainz, Germany; Branko Eremenc, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia; and Helen M. Liversidge, Dental Institute, Bart’s and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK, who kindly supplied sample data from their respective countries.

References

  1. 1.
    Saunders E (1837) The teeth: a test of age considered with reference to the factory children. Renshaw Strand, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JH (1973) A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 45:221–227Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koshy S, Tandon S (1998) Dental age assessment: the applicability of Demirjian’s method in south Indian children. Forensic Sci Int 94:73–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nykanen R, Espeland L, Kvaal SI, Krogstad O (1998) Validity of the Demirjian method for dental age estimation when applied to Norwegian children. Acta Odontol Scand 56:238–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liversidge HM, Speechly T, Hector MP (1999) Dental maturation in British children: are Demirjian’s standards applicable? Int J Paediatr Dent 9:263–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prabhakar AR, Panda AK, Raju OS (2002) Applicability of Demirjian’s method of age assessment in children of Davangere. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 20:54–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eid RM, Simi R, Friggi MN, Fisberg M (2002) Assessment of dental maturity of Brazilian children aged 6 to 14 years using Demirjian’s method. Int J Paediatr Dent 12:423–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaillet N, Willems G, Demirjian A (2004) Dental maturity in Belgian children using Demirjian’s method and polynomial functions: new standard curves for forensic and clinical use. J Forensic Odonto Stomatol 22:18–27Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chaillet N, Demirjian A (2004) Dental maturity in south France: a comparison between Demirjian’s method and polynomial functions. J Forensic Sci 49:1059–1066PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaillet N, Nystrom M, Demirjian A (2005) Comparison of dental maturity in children of different ethnic origins: international maturity curves for clinicians. J Forensic Sci 50:1164–1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M (2006) Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth. Int J Legal Med 120:49–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Scarpino F, Branko E, Betjtulla Z (2006) Dental age estimation of growing children: comparison among various European countries. Acta Stomatol Croat 40:255–262Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eveleth PB, Tanner JM (1990) Worldwide variation in human growth, edn. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 6–7Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mühler M, Schulz R, Schmidt S, Schmeling A, Reisinger W (2006) The influence of slice thickness on assessment of clavicle ossification in forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med 120:15–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schmeling A, Baumann U, Schmidt S, Wernecke KD, Reisinger W (2006) Reference data for the Thiemann–Nitz method of assessing skeletal age for the purpose of forensic age estimation. Int J Legal Med 120:1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Mirtella D, Cingolani M (2006) Carpals and epiphyses of radius and ulna as age indicators. Int J Legal Med 120:143–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olze A, Bilang D, Schmidt S, Wernecke KD, Geserick G, Schmeling A (2005) Validation of common classification systems for assessing the mineralization of third molars. Int J Legal Med 119:22–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paewinsky E, Pfeiffer H, Brinkmann B (2005) Quantification of secondary dentine formation from orthopantomograms—a contribution to forensic age estimation methods in adults. Int J Legal Med 119:27–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nolla CM (1960) The development of the permanent teeth. J Dent Child 27:254–266Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haavikko K (1974) Tooth formation age estimated on a few selected teeth. A simple method for clinical use. Proc Finn Dent Soc 70:15–19PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Cameriere
    • 1
    • 4
  • Danilo De Angelis
    • 2
  • Luigi Ferrante
    • 3
  • Francesco Scarpino
    • 1
  • Mariano Cingolani
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Legal MedicineUniversity of MacerataMacerataItaly
  2. 2.Laboratorio di Antropologia e Odontologia forense (LABANOF), Institute of Legal MedicineUniversity of MilanoMilanItaly
  3. 3.Institute of Microbiology and Biomedical SciencesPolytechnic University of Marche, AnconaAnconaItaly
  4. 4.Institute of Forensic MedicineUniversity of MacerataMacerataItaly

Personalised recommendations