The determination of firing distance applying a microscopic quantitative method and confocal laser scanning microscopy for detection of gunshot residue particles
- 609 Downloads
- 23 Citations
Abstract
In this study, we applied a microscopic quantitative method based on the use of sodium rhodizonate to verify the presence of residues and their distribution on the cutis of gunshot wounds. A total of 250 skin samples were selected from cases in which the manner of death (accidental, suicide, and homicide) and the shooting distance could be reliably determined. The samples were examined under a light microscope, in transmitted bright field illumination and phase contrast mode, and with confocal laser scanning microscopy. In all skin specimens the area of each histological section was directly measured by an image analysis system. Both the number and the size of powder particles were measured. The distribution of gunshot residues (GSR) in the epidermal and subepidermal layers was also analyzed. The evaluation of the microscopic entrance wounds demonstrated different findings related to the range of fire. The data derived from the evaluation of both macroscopic and microscopic features demonstrated that the amount and the spatial distribution of GSR deposits in the skin surrounding entrance wounds strictly correlate with shooting distance.
Keywords
Histology Gunshot wound Gunshot residues Sodium rhodizonate Quantitative morphometry Confocal laser scanning microscopeReferences
- 1.Stahling S, Karlsson T (2000) A method for collection of gunshot residues from skin and other surfaces. J Forensic Sci 45:1299–1302PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Karger B, Puskas Z, Ruwald B, Teige K, Schuirer G (1998) Morphological findings in the brain after experimental gunshots using radiology, pathology and histology. Int J Legal Med 111:314–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Große Perdekamp M, Vennemann B, Mattern D, Serr A, Pollak S (2005) Tissue defect at the gunshot entrance wound: what happens to the skin? Int J Legal Med 119:217–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Faller-Marquardt M, Pollak S (2002) Skin tears away from the entrance wound in gunshots to the head. Int J Legal Med 116:262–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Biedermann A, Taroni F (2006) A probabilistic approach to the joint evaluation of firearm evidence and gunshot residues. Forensic Sci Int. DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.11.001
- 6.Matty W (1987) Primer composition and gunshot residue. Assoc Firearms Tool Mark Exam J 19:8–13Google Scholar
- 7.Bydal BA (1990) Percussion primer mixes. Assoc Firearms Tool Mark Exam J 22:1–26Google Scholar
- 8.Wallace JS (1990) Chemical aspects of firearms ammunition. Assoc Firearms Tool Mark Exam J 22:364–389Google Scholar
- 9.Harrison HC, Gilroy R (1959) Firearm’s discharge residues. J Forensic Sci 4:184–199Google Scholar
- 10.Basu S (1982) Formation of gunshot residues. J Forensic Sci 27:72–91Google Scholar
- 11.Kage S, Kudo K, Kaizoji A, Ryumoto J, Ikeda H, Ikeda N (2001) A simple method for detection of gunshot residue particles from hands, hair, face, and clothing using scanning electron microscopy/wavelength dispersive X-ray (SEM/WDX). J Forensic Sci 46:830–834PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Romolo FS, Margot P (2001) Identification of gunshot residue: a critical review. Forensic Sci Int 119:195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lebiedzik J, Johnson DL (2000) Rapid search and quantitative analysis of gunshot residue particle in the SEM. J Forensic Sci 45:83–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Marty W, Sigrist T, Wyler D (2002) Determination of firing distance using the rhodizonate staining technique. Int J Legal Med 116:1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Masters BR, So PTC (2001) Confocal microscopy and multi-photon excitation microscopy of human skin in vivo. Opt Exp 8:2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Adeyi O, Duval JV, Dupre ME, Andrew TA (2005) Role of chemical tests and scene investigation in determination of range of fire. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 26:166–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Karger B, Hoekstra A, Schmidt PF (2001) Trajectory reconstruction from trace evidence on spent bullets. I. Deposits from intermediate targets. Int J Legal Med 115:16–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Janssen W (1984) Forensic histopathology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 289–292Google Scholar
- 19.Faller-Marquardt M, Bohnert M, Pollak S (2004) Detachment of the periosteum and soot staining of its underside in contact shots to the cerebral cranium. Int J Legal Med 118:343–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Borlinghaus R, Gröbler B (1997) Basic principles and applications of confocal laser scanning microscopy. In: Isenberg G (ed) Modern optics, electronics, and high precision techniques in cell biology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 35–53Google Scholar
- 21.Karger B, Billeb E, Koops E, Brinkmann B (2002) Autopsy features relevant for discrimination between suicidal and homicidal gunshot injuries. Int J Legal Med 116:273–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Verhoff MA, Karger B (2003) Atypical gunshot entrance wound and extensive backspatter. Int J Legal Med 117:229–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Plattner T, Kneubuehl B, Thali M, Zollinger U (2003) Gunshot residue patterns on skin in angled contact and near contact gunshot wounds. Forensic Sci Int 138:68–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Williams R, Sellier K (1991) Shot range determination. Forensic science progress, vol. 6. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–104Google Scholar
- 25.Francisco JT (1980) Histopathology of gunshot wounds in microscopic diagnosis. In: Perper JA, Wecht CH (eds) Microscopic diagnosis in forensic pathology. CC Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, pp 327–336Google Scholar