International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 119, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Separate analysis of DYS385a and b versus conventional DYS385 typing: is there forensic relevance?

  • Harald Niederstätter
  • Burkhard Berger
  • Herbert Oberacher
  • Anita Brandstätter
  • Christian G. Huber
  • Walther Parson
Original Article


In order to determine to what extent the separate analysis of both copies of DYS385 improves Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat (Y-STR) haplotyping, we followed a recently published protocol for the separate amplification of DYS385a and DYS385b with modifications and compared the results with those obtained by conventional analysis in a population sample comprising 133 unrelated Caucasian males from Austria. Additionally, we typed all markers of the minimal haplotype (minHT) and a set of Y-chromosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms (Y-SNPs) in order to interpret the STR data depending on the Y-SNP haplogroup structure. The separate amplification of DYS385a and b improved the power of discrimination of this marker when compared to the results obtained with the conventional non-locus-discriminating amplification strategy. However, the degree of this improvement varied greatly between different haplogroups and was found to be highest in clade K. In the forensically relevant context of the minHT, the separate analysis of the DYS385 alleles had no effect on the differentiation of paternal lineages in our study. Furthermore, the amplicon lengths of 700–780 base pairs obtained in the course of the locus-discriminating approach restrict the applicability of this amplification strategy to high quality DNA samples.


Y chromosome DYS385 Y-STR Y-SNP haplogroups Population study 



We thank Alexandra Lindinger for excellent technical assistance and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions regarding the designation of DYS385 phenotypes.


  1. Beleza S, Alves C, Gonzalez-Neira A, Lareu M, Amorim A, Carracedo A, Gusmão L (2003) Extending STR markers in Y chromosome haplotypes. Int J Legal Med 117:27–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger B, Hölzl G, Oberacher H, Niederstätter H, Huber CG, Parson W (2002) Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping by on-line liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in forensic science of the Y-chromosomal locus M9. J Chromatogr B 782:89–97Google Scholar
  3. Berger B, Niederstätter H, Brandstätter A, Parson W (2003) Molecular characterization and Austrian Caucasian population data of the multi-copy Y-chromosomal STR DYS464. Forensic Sci Int 137:221–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler JM, Schoske R, Vallone PM, Kline MC, Redd AJ, Hammer MF (2002) A novel multiplex for simultaneous amplification of 20 Y chromosome STR markers. Forensic Sci Int 129:10–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gill P, Brenner C, Brinkmann B et al. (2001) DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on forensic analysis using Y-chromosome STRs. Int J Legal Med 114:305–309, Forensic Sci Int 124:5–10Google Scholar
  6. Hurles ME, Irven C, Nicholson J et al. (1998) European Y-chromosomal lineages in Polynesians: a contrast to the population structure revealed by mtDNA. Am J Hum Genet 63:1793–1806PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hurles ME, Veitia R, Arroyo E et al. (1999) Recent male-mediated gene flow over a linguistic barrier in Iberia, suggested by analysis of a Y-chromosomal DNA polymorphism. Am J Hum Genet 65:1437–1448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jobling MA, Tyler-Smith C (2003) The human Y chromosome: an evolutionary marker comes of age. Nat Rev Genet 4:598–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kayser M, Caglià A, Corach D et al. (1997) Evaluation of Y-chromosomal STRs: a multicenter study. Int J Legal Med 110:125–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kittler R, Erler A, Brauer S, Stoneking M, Kayser M (2003) Apparent intrachromosomal exchange on the human Y chromosome explained by population history. Eur J Hum Genet 11:304–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Oberacher H, Parson W, Mühlmann R, Huber CG (2001) Analysis of polymerase chain reaction products by on-line liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for genotyping of polymorphic short tandem repeat loci. Anal Chem 73:5109–5115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Osoegawa K, Woon PY, Zhao B, Frengen E, Tateno M, Catanese JJ, Jong PJ de (1998) An improved approach for construction of bacterial artificial chromosome libraries. Genomics 52:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Parson W, Niederstätter H, Köchl S, Steinlechner M, Berger B (2001) When autosomal short tandem repeats fail: optimized primer and reaction design for Y-chromosome short tandem repeat analysis in forensic casework. Croat Med J 42:285–287Google Scholar
  14. Premstaller A, Oberacher H, Huber CG (2000) High-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of single- and double stranded nucleic acids using monolithic capillary columns. Anal Chem 72:4386–4393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Redd AJ, Agellon AB, Kearney VA et al. (2002) Forensic value of 14 novel STRs on the human Y chromosome. Forensic Sci Int 130:97–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Roewer L, Krawczak M, Willuweit S et al. (2001) Online reference database of European Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat (STR) haplotypes. Forensic Sci Int 118:106–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosser ZH, Zerjal T, Hurles ME et al. (2000) Y-chromosomal diversity in Europe is clinal and influenced primarily by geography, rather than by language. Am J Hum Genet 67:1526–1543PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Santos FR, Carvalho-Silva DR, Pena SDJ (1999) PCR-based DNA profiling of human Y chromosomes. In: Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T (eds) Methods and tools in biosciences and medicine. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 133–152Google Scholar
  19. Schneider PM, Meuser S, Waiyawuth W, Seo Y, Rittner C (1998) Tandem repeat structure of the duplicated Y-chromosomal STR locus DYS385 and frequency studies in the German and three Asian populations. Forensic Sci Int 97:61–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin ver. 2.000: a software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  21. Seo Y, Takami Y, Takahama K, Yoshizawa M, Nakayama T, Yukawa N (2003) A method for genotyping Y chromosome-linked DYS385a and DYS385b loci. Leg Med 5:228–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Skaletsky H, Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Minx PJ et al. (2003) The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes. Nature 423:825–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Y Chromosome Consortium (2003) A nomenclature system for the tree of human Y-chromosomal binary haplogroups. Genome Res 12:339–348Google Scholar
  24. Zarrabeitia MT, Riancho JA, Gusmão L, Lareu MV, Sanudo C, Amorim A, Carracedo A (2003) Spanish population data and forensic usefulness of a novel Y-STR set (DYS437, DYS438, DYS439, DYS460, DYS461, GATA A10, GATA C4, GATA H4). Int J Legal Med 117:306–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zerjal T, Dashnyam B, Pandya A et al. (1997) Genetic relationships of Asians and northern Europeans, revealed by Y-chromosomal DNA analysis. Am J Hum Genet 60:1174–1183PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harald Niederstätter
    • 1
  • Burkhard Berger
    • 1
  • Herbert Oberacher
    • 1
  • Anita Brandstätter
    • 1
  • Christian G. Huber
    • 2
  • Walther Parson
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Legal MedicineMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.Instrumental Analysis and BioanalysisSaarland University Building 9.2SaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations