International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 117, Issue 5, pp 257–262 | Cite as

Deformation characteristics of the human mandible in low impact experiments

  • A. DuChesne
  • M. Unnewehr
  • P. F. Schmidt
  • P. Sótonyi
  • B. Brinkmann
  • J. Piffkó
  • G. Fischer
  • T. Bajanowski
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

A total of 11 human mandibles were subjected to physical impacts under standardised conditions. Two impact sites and directions were tested and the impact load was varied in four steps. Two occlusional strengths were applied and the influence of simulated soft tissue covering was recorded. The deformation of the bones was measured using strain gauge strips located at eight defined sites. In a series of frontal to occipital impacts the frontal areas and the collum showed the largest length changes. Increasing impact intensities led to a proportional increase of the length changes. An increase of the occlusional strength was either protective (at the collum) or it increased the deformation (frontal area). The soft tissue covering was only partly protective. Lateral impact was characterised by a compression on the side of the impact and stretching on the other side only. The intensity and speed of deformation increased with increasing distance from the site of impact. A fixed occlusion caused an increase of compression at the site of impact and an increasing stretching in the frontal part of the bone and at the opposite collum.

Keywords

Human mandible Blunt trauma Biomechanics Strain gauge measurement 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Rougé-Maillart C, Tracqui A, Tortel MC, Pessaux P, Penneau M, Ludes B (2002) Fatal blunt pancreatic trauma secondary to assault and battery: a case report. Int J Legal Med 115:162–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Darok M, Beham-Schmid C, Gattering R, Roll P (2001) Sudden death from myocardial contusion following an isolated blunt force trauma to the chest. Int J Legal Med 115:85–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bajanowski T, Köhler H, Schmidt PF, Salder CF von, Brinkmann B (2001) The cloven hoof in legal medicine. Int J Legal Med 114:346–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vock R (2001) Liver rupture caused by isolated blunt force impact: the result of a blow, a kick or a fall? Int J Legal Med 114:244–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Allan BP, Daly CG (1990) Fractures of the mandible. A 35–year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 19:268–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meyer U, Benthaus S, Du Chesne A, Wannhof H, Zöllner B, Joos U (1999) Untersuchung von Patienten mit Gesichtsschädelfrakturen unter ätiologischen und rechtsrelevanten Gesichtspunkten. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 3:152–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hansis M (1993) Unvollständige Befunderhebung und Befundbeschreibung als Ursache gutachterlicher Probleme nach Unfallverletzungen. Versicherungsmedizin 5:152–155Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arendts FJ, Sigolotto C (1990) Mechanische Kennwerte des Human-Unterkiefers und Untersuchung zum "in-vivo"-Verhalten des kompakten Knochengewebes. Ein Beitrag zur Darstellung der Biomechanik des Unterkiefers Teil 2. Biomed Tech 35:123–130Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kober C, Sader R, Thiele H, Bauer H-J, Zeilhofer H-F, Hoffmann K-H, Horch H-H (2001) Spannungsanalyse des menschlichen Unterkiefers bei traumatologischen Standardsituationen mittels numerischer Simulation. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 5: 114–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huelke DF, Harger JH (1968) Mechanisms in the production of mandibular fractures: An Experimental Study. J Oral Surg 26:86–91Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huelke DF, Patrick LM (1964) Mechanics in the production of mandibular fractures: Strain-gauge measurements of impacts to the chin. J Dent Res 43: 437–446Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harada K, Watanabe M, Okhura K, Enomoto S (2000) Measure of bite force and occlusal contact area before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using a new pressure-sensitive device: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:370–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thompson DJ, Throckmorton GS, Buschang PH (2001) The effects of isometric exercise on maximum voluntary bite forces and jaw muscle strength and endurance. J Oral Rehabil 28:909–917CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joch W, Krause J, Fritsche P (1982) Schlagkraft und Bewegungsschnelligkeit des Boxers. Leistungssport 12:4046Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith MS, Dyson RJ, Hale T, Janaway L (2000) Development of a boxing dynamometer and its punch force discrimination efficacy. J Sports Sci 18:445–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meyer U, Vollmer D, Homann C et al. (2000) Experimentelle und finite-Elemente-Analyse der Biomechanik des Unterkiefers unter Belastung. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 4:14–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vollmer D, Meyer U, Joos U, Vegh A, Piffko J (2000) Experimental and finite element study of a human mandible. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 28:91–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Da Fonseca GD (1974) Experimental study on fractures of the mandibular condylar process (mandibular condylar process fractures). Int J Oral Surg 3:89–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Petzel JR, Bülles G (1981) Experimental studies of the fracture of the mandibular condylar process. J Maxillofac Surg 9:211–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Austermann K-H, Lisiak O (1980) Untersuchung zur Biomechanik von Kiefergelenkbrüchen. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir 25:124–128Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. DuChesne
    • 1
  • M. Unnewehr
    • 1
  • P. F. Schmidt
    • 2
  • P. Sótonyi
    • 3
  • B. Brinkmann
    • 1
  • J. Piffkó
    • 4
  • G. Fischer
    • 5
  • T. Bajanowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Legal MedicineWestfälische-Wilhelms-UniversitätMünsterGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Medical Physics and BiophysicsWestfälische-Wilhelms-UniversitätMünsterGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Legal MedicineSemmelweis-University BudapestBudapestHungary
  4. 4.Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversity Hospital MünsterMünsterGermany
  5. 5.Abt. für QualitätswesenUniversität DortmundDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations