Advertisement

Chromosoma

, Volume 127, Issue 4, pp 475–487 | Cite as

New slbo-Gal4 driver lines for the analysis of border cell migration during Drosophila oogenesis

  • Anna A. OgienkoEmail author
  • Lyubov A. Yarinich
  • Elena V. Fedorova
  • Mikhail O. Lebedev
  • Evgeniya N. Andreyeva
  • Alexey V. Pindyurin
  • Elina M. Baricheva
Original Article

Abstract

Border cell (BC) migration during Drosophila oogenesis is an excellent model for the analysis of the migratory and invasive cell behavior. Most studies on BC migration have exploited a slbo-Gal4 driver to regulate gene expression in these cells or to mark them. Here, we report that the slbo-Gal4 transgene present in the line #6458 from the Bloomington Stock Center is inserted within chickadee (chic), a gene encoding the actin-binding protein Profilin, which promotes actin polymerization and is known to be involved in cell migration. The chic6458 mutation caused by the transgene insertion behaves as a null chic allele and is homozygous lethal. To evaluate possible effects of chic6458 on the assessment of BC behavior, we generated new lines bearing the slbo-Gal4 transgene inserted into different second chromosome loci that do not appear to be involved in cell migration. Using these new lines and the slbo-Gal4-chic6458 line, we defined the functional relationships between the twinfilin (twf) and chic in BC migration. Migration of BCs is substantially reduced by mutations in twf, which encodes an actin-binding protein that inhibits actin filament assembly. The defects caused by twf mutations are significantly suppressed when the slbo-Gal4-chic6458, but not the new slbo-Gal4 drivers were used. These findings indicate twf and chic interact and function antagonistically during BC migration in Drosophila oogenesis.

Keywords

Drosophila melanogaster Cell migration Border cells slbo-Gal4 driver chickadee Profilin twinfilin BDSC line #6458 BDSC line #76363 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Svetlana Fedorova for helpful suggestions, Sergei Baiborodin for help with confocal microscopy, Alexander Krasnikov for assistance with SEM, Lynn Cooley (Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA) and Maurizio Gatti (Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy) for the gift of chic mutant lines, and Lidiya Boldyreva and Maurizio Gatti for critical readings of the manuscript. SEM was conducted at the Shared Center for Microscopic Analysis of the Central Siberian Botanical Garden, SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia). Microscopic analyses and DNA sequencing were carried out at the Multiple-Access Center for Microscopy of Biological Subjects of the ICG SB RAS and the “Molecular and Cellular Biology” core facility of the IMCB SB RAS, respectively. The work at the ICG SB RAS was supported by the ICG SB RAS budget project no. 0324-2018-0019 and a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 16-04-01018); the estimation of transgene copy numbers and identification of transgene insertion sites were supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 16-14-10288).

Supplementary material

412_2018_676_MOESM1_ESM.docx (64 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 64 kb)
412_2018_676_MOESM2_ESM.png (414 kb)
ESM 2 (PNG 414 kb)
412_2018_676_MOESM3_ESM.png (188 kb)
ESM 3 (PNG 187 kb)
412_2018_676_MOESM4_ESM.png (3.1 mb)
ESM 4 (PNG 3.08 mb)
412_2018_676_MOESM5_ESM.png (462 kb)
ESM 5 (PNG 462 kb)
412_2018_676_MOESM6_ESM.png (574 kb)
ESM 6 (PNG 573 kb)
412_2018_676_MOESM7_ESM.png (695 kb)
ESM 7 (PNG 695 kb)
412_2018_676_MOESM8_ESM.png (871 kb)
ESM 8 (PNG 871 kb)

References

  1. Assaker G, Ramel D, Wculek SK, Gonzalez-Gaitan M, Emery G (2010) Spatial restriction of receptor tyrosine kinase activity through a polarized endocytic cycle controls border cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:22558–22563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auld VJ, Fetter RD, Broadie K, Goodman CS (1995) Gliotactin, a novel transmembrane protein on peripheral glia is required to form the blood-nerve barrier in Drosophila. Cell 81:757–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burridge K, Wennerberg K (2004) Rho and Rac take center stage. Cell 116:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55:611–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen J, Godt D, Gunsalus K, Kiss I, Goldberg M, Laski FA (2001) Cofilin/ADF is required for cell motility during Drosophila ovary development and oogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 3:204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooley L, Verheyen E, Ayers K (1992) chickadee encodes a profilin required for intercellular cytoplasm transport during Drosophila oogenesis. Cell 69:173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickson B (1996) Transgenic lines 1010T2 and 1010T10. Personal communication to FlyBase http://flybase.org/reports/FBrf0086268.html
  8. Giansanti MG, Bonaccorsi S, Williams B, Williams EV, Santolamazza C, Goldberg ML, Gatti M (1998) Cooperative interactions between the central spindle and the contractile ring during Drosophila cytokinesis. Genes Dev 12:396–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guild GM, Connelly PS, Shaw MK, Tilney LG (1997) Actin filament cables in Drosophila nurse cells are composed of modules that slide passively past one another during dumping. J Cell Biol 138:783–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Horne-Badovinac S, Bilder D (2005) Mass transit: epithelial morphogenesis in the Drosophila egg chamber. Dev Dyn 232:559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoskins RA, Carlson JW, Wan KH, Park S, Mendez I, Galle SE, Booth BW, Pfeiffer BD, George RA, Svirskas R, Krzywinski M, Schein J, Accardo MC, Damia E, Messina G, Méndez-Lago M, de Pablos B, Demakova OV, Andreyeva EN, Boldyreva LV, Marra M, Carvalho AB, Dimitri P, Villasante A, Zhimulev IF, Rubin GM, Karpen GH, Celniker SE (2015) The release 6 reference sequence of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Res 25:445–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klämbt C, Jacobs JR, Goodman CS (1991) The midline of the Drosophila central nervous system: a model for the genetic analysis of cell fate cell migration and growth cone guidance. Cell 64:801–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin TH, Yeh TH, Wang TW, Yu JY (2014) The Hippo pathway controls border cell migration through distinct mechanisms in outer border cells and polar cells of the Drosophila ovary. Genetics 198:1087–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luo J, Zuo J, Wu J, Wan P, Kang D, Xiang C, Zhu H, Chen J (2015) In vivo RNAi screen identifies candidate signaling genes required for collective cell migration in Drosophila ovary. Sci China Life Sci 58:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Margolis J, Spradling A (1995) Identification and behavior of epithelial stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development 121:3797–3807PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Montell DJ (2003) Border-cell migration: the race is on. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Montell DJ, Rørth P, Spradling AC (1992) slow border cells, a locus required for a developmentally regulated cell migration during oogenesis encodes Drosophila C/EBP. Cell 71:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morgan NS, Heintzelman MB, Mooseker MS (1995) Characterization of myosin-IA and myosin-IB, two unconventional myosins associated with the Drosophila brush border cytoskeleton. Dev Biol 172:51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Newton IL, Savytskyy O, Sheehan KB (2015) Wolbachia utilize host actin for efficient maternal transmission in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ochman H, Gerber AS, Hartl DL (1988) Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction. Genetics 120:621–623PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ogienko AA, Fedorova SA, Baricheva EM (2007) Basic aspects of ovarian development in Drosophila melanogaster. Russ J Genet 43:1120–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pfeiffer BD, Ngo TT, Hibbard KL, Murphy C, Jenett A, Truman JW, Rubin GM (2010) Refinement of tools for targeted gene expression in Drosophila. Genetics 186:735–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pindyurin AV, Pagie L, Kozhevnikova EN, van Arensbergen J, van Steensel B (2016) Inducible DamID systems for genomic mapping of chromatin proteins in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res 44:5646–5657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Radonić A, Thulke S, Mackay IM, Landt O, Siegert W, Nitsche A (2004) Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 313:856–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raftopoulou M, Hall A (2004) Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way. Dev Biol 265:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robertson HM, Preston CR, Phillis RW (1988) A stable genomic source of P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 118:461–470PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Rørth P, (2002) Initiating and guiding migration: lessons from border cells. Trends in Cell Biology 12 (7):325-331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rørth P, Szabo K, Bailey A, Laverty T, Rehm J, Rubin GM, Weigmann K, Milán M, Benes V, Ansorge W, Cohen SM (1998) Systematic gain-of-function genetics in Drosophila. Development 125:1049–1057PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rørth P, Szabo K, Texido G (2000) The level of C/EBP protein is critical for cell migration during Drosophila oogenesis and is tightly controlled by regulated degradation. Mol Cell 6:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruohola H, Bremer KA, Baker D (1991) Role of neurogenic genes in establishment of follicle cell fate and oocyte polarity during oogenesis in Drosophila. Cell 66:433–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saadin A, Starz-Gaiano M (2016) Circuitous genetic regulation governs a straightforward cell migration. Trends Genet 32:660–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skora AD, Spradling AC (2010) Epigenetic stability increases extensively during Drosophila follicle stem cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:7389–7394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sokol NS, Cooley L (2003) Drosophila filamin is required for follicle cell motility during oogenesis. Dev Biol 260:260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Somogyi K, Rørth P (2004) Cortactin modulates cell migration and ring canal morphogenesis during Drosophila oogenesis. Mech Dev 121:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spradling AC (1993) Developmental genetics of oogenesis. In: Bate M, Arias AM (eds) The development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbour, pp 1–70Google Scholar
  37. Stossel TP, Condeelis J, Cooley L, Hartwig JH, Noegel A, Schleicher M, Shapiro SS (2001) Filamins as integrators of cell mechanics and signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verheyen EM, Cooley L (1994) Profilin mutations disrupt multiple actin-dependent processes during Drosophila development. Development 120:717–728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wahlström G, Vartiainen M, Yamamoto L (2001) Twinfilin is required for actin-dependent developmental processes in Drosophila. J Cell Biol 155:787–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang X, Bo J, Bridges T, Dugan KD, Pan TC, Chodosh LA, Montell DJ (2006) Analysis of cell migration using whole-genome expression profiling of migratory cells in the Drosophila ovary. Dev Cell 10:483–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang D, Zhang L, Zhao G, Wahlstrom G, Heino TI, Chen J, Zhang YQ (2010a) Drosophila twinfilin is required for cell migration and synaptic endocytosis. J Cell Sci 123:1546–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang X, He L, Wu YI, Hahn KM, Montell DJ (2010b) Light-mediated activation reveals a key role for Rac in collective guidance of cell movement in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 12:591–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weaver AM, Young ME, Lee WL, Cooper JA (2003) Integration of signals to the Arp2/3 complex. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weed SA, Parsons JT (2001) Cortactin: coupling membrane dynamics to cortical actin assembly. Oncogene 20:6418–6434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xue F, Cooley L (1993) kelch encodes a component of intercellular bridges in Drosophila egg chambers. Cell 72:681–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  3. 3.Novosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations