Advertisement

Chromosoma

, Volume 124, Issue 3, pp 367–383 | Cite as

Dynamics of hnRNPs and omega speckles in normal and heat shocked live cell nuclei of Drosophila melanogaster

  • Anand K. Singh
  • Subhash C. Lakhotia
Research Article

Abstract

The nucleus limited long-noncoding hsrω-n transcripts, hnRNPs, and some other RNA processing proteins organize nucleoplasmic omega speckles in Drosophila. Unlike other nuclear speckles, omega speckles rapidly disappear following cell stress, while hnRNPs and other associated proteins move away from chromosome sites, nucleoplasm, and the disappearing speckles to get uniquely sequestered at hsrω locus. Omega speckles reappear and hnRNPs get redistributed to normal locations during recovery from stress. With a view to understand the dynamics of omega speckles and their associated proteins, we used live imaging of GFP tagged hnRNPs (Hrb87F, Hrb98DE, or Squid) in unstressed and stressed Drosophila cells. Omega speckles display size-dependent mobility in nucleoplasmic domains with significant colocalization with nuclear matrix Tpr/Megator and SAFB proteins, which also accumulate at hsrω gene site after stress. Instead of moving towards the nuclear periphery located hsrω locus following heat shock or colchicine treatment, omega speckles rapidly disappear within nucleoplasm while chromosomal and nucleoplasmic hnRNPs move, stochastically or, more likely, by nuclear matrix-mediated transport to hsrω locus in non-particulate form. Continuing transcription of hsrω during cell stress is essential for sequestering incoming hnRNPs at the site. While recovering from stress, the sequestered hnRNPs are released as omega speckles in ISWI-dependent manner. Photobleaching studies reveal hnRNPs to freely move between nucleoplasm, omega speckles, chromosome regions, and hsrω gene site although their residence periods at chromosomes and hsrω locus are longer. A model for regulation of exchange of hnRNPs between nuclear compartments by hsrω-n transcripts is presented.

Keywords

Hrb87F Hrb98DE Squid hsrω lncRNA 93D puff Live cell imaging Megator SAFB 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. H. Saumweber (Germany) for P11 and BX34 antibodies, Dr. Keith A. Maggert (USA) for UAS-SAFB-GFP stock, and Drs. Stephen W. Mckechnie (Australia) for hsrω 66 , D. Corona (Italy) for ISWI 1 Bc/SM5 and ISWI 2 ; +/T(2;3)CyO, TM6B, Tb, Allan C. Spradling, (USA) for Hrb87F-GFP, and Alain Debec (France) for Squid-GFP and Hrb98DE-GFP stocks. This work was supported by the CEIB-II grant from Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India and by the Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (Department of Atomic Energy, Govt. of India) through Raja Ramanna Fellowship to SCL. We thank the Department of Science & Technology, Govt. of India (New Delhi) and the Banaras Hindu University for Confocal Microscopy facility in our laboratory. AKS has been supported as Senior Research Fellow by the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (New Delhi) and as Research Associate by the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India.

Supplementary material

412_2015_506_Fig9_ESM.gif (121 kb)
Fig. S1

Stable peripheral location of the hsrω gene site and reproducible accumulation and redistribution of hnRNPs during repeated HS and recovery periods. Time lapse live cell confocal images of Hrb87F-GFP expressing hsrω + SG nucleus at 5 min intervals (noted at upper left corner of each panel) during repeated HS and recovery periods. The on-stage incubation temperature for each row is indicated on left. (GIF 120 kb)

412_2015_506_MOESM1_ESM.tif (1.7 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 1746 kb)
412_2015_506_Fig10_ESM.gif (222 kb)
Fig. S2

FRAP of Hrb87F-GFP in nucleoplasm and at the 93D site in wild type cells. (A) FRAP in unstressed control peripodial cell at nucleoplasmic ROI (red circles). (B, C) FRAP after 30 min HS at nucleoplasmic ROI (B) or at 93D cluster ROI (C). (D) FRAP at ROI in the 74EF/75B developmental puffs in unstressed SG polytene nucleus. In all cases, confocal images of the same optical section are shown at prebleach stage, just after bleaching (t = 0.0 s) and at different time points (in s) thereafter (noted in top row of each column). Scale bar applies to all images. (GIF 221 kb)

412_2015_506_MOESM2_ESM.tif (1.1 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 1138 kb)
412_2015_506_Fig11_ESM.gif (172 kb)
Fig. S3

Hrb87F-GFP is exchanged between different nuclear compartments. (A) FLIP in unstressed control peripodial cell with ROI1 (red circle) and ROI2 (blue circle) being different sites in the nucleoplasm. (B) FLIP in 30 min heat shocked peripodial cell with ROI1 being nucleoplasmic (red circle), ROI2 being aggregate at 93D site (green circle) and ROI3 being a nucleoplasmic area (pink circle). (C) FLIP in 30 min heat shocked peripodial cell with the 93D cluster as ROI1 (red circle), ROI2 being the same region at 93D cluster (sky blue circle) and ROI3 being an area in nucleoplasm (purple circle). Each row shows confocal images of same optical section at different time points (in s) noted in top row of each column. The scale bar in 1st column of top row applies to all images. (GIF 171 kb)

412_2015_506_MOESM3_ESM.tif (1.6 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 1641 kb)
412_2015_506_Fig12_ESM.gif (204 kb)
Fig. S4

Association of hnRNPs with hsrω transcripts slows down their movement. FLIP in unstressed Hrb87F-GFP hsrω + (A) unstressed Hrb87F-GFP hsrω 66 peripodial cell (B) and heat shocked Hrb87F-GFP hsrω + peripodial cell (C). Green circles indicate photobleached nucleoplasmic ROI1 while red circles indicate nucleoplasmic ROI 2 region used to measure loss of fluorescence at different time points (in s) indicated in top row of each column. Genotype of cells is indicated on left of each row. The scale bar in 1st column of top row applies to all images. (GIF 203 kb)

412_2015_506_MOESM4_ESM.tif (1.9 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 1957 kb)

References

  1. Alfonso-Parra C, Maggert KA (2010) Drosophila SAF-B links the nuclear matrix, chromosomes, and transcriptional activity. PLoS One 5:e10248PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arao Y, Kuriyama R, Kayama F, Kato S (2000) A nuclear matrix-associated factor, SAF-B, interacts with specific isoforms of AUF1/hnRNP D. Arch Biochem Biophys 380:228–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Axelrod D, Koppel DE, Schlessinger J, Elson E, Webb WW (1976) Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys J 16:1055–1069PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendena WG, Garbe JC, Traverse KL, Lakhotia SC, Pardue ML (1989) Multiple inducers of the Drosophila heat shock locus 93D (hsr omega): inducer-specific patterns of the three transcripts. J Cell Biol 108:2017–2028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Buszczak M, Paterno S, Lighthouse D, Bachman J, Planck J, Owen S, Skora AD, Nystul TG, Ohlstein B, Allen A et al (2007) The carnegie protein trap library: a versatile tool for Drosophila developmental studies. Genetics 175:1505–1531PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Corona DF, Tamkun JW (2004) Multiple roles for ISWI in transcription, chromosome organization and DNA replication. Biochim Biophys Acta 1677:113–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Corona DF, Siriaco G, Armstrong JA, Snarskaya N, McClymont SA, Scott MP, Tamkun JW (2007) ISWI regulates higher-order chromatin structure and histone H1 assembly in vivo. PLoS Biol 5:e232PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dangli A, Bautz EK (1983) Differential distribution of nonhistone proteins from polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster after heat shock. Chromosoma 88:201–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dangli A, Grond C, Kloetzel P, Bautz EK (1983) Heat-shock puff 93D from Drosophila melanogaster: accumulation of a RNP-specific antigen associated with giant particles of possible storage function. EMBO J 2:1747–1751PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Derksen J, Willart E (1976) Cytochemical studies on RNP complexes produced by puff 2-48BC in Drosophila hydei: uranyl acetate and phosphotungstic acid staining. Chromosoma 55:57–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Deuring R, Fanti L, Armstrong JA, Sarte M, Papoulas O, Prestel M, Daubresse G, Verardo M, Moseley SL, Berloco M et al (2000) The ISWI chromatin-remodeling protein is required for gene expression and the maintenance of higher order chromatin structure in vivo. Mol Cell 5:355–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Garbe JC, Bendena WG, Alfano M, Pardue ML (1986) A Drosophila heat shock locus with a rapidly diverging sequence but a conserved structure. J Biol Chem 261:16889–16894PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorisch SM, Wachsmuth M, Ittrich C, Bacher CP, Rippe K, Lichter P (2004) Nuclear body movement is determined by chromatin accessibility and dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:13221–13226PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Han SP, Tang YH, Smith R (2010) Functional diversity of the hnRNPs: past, present and perspectives. Biochem J 430:379–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. He DC, Martin T, Penman S (1991) Localization of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein in the interphase nuclear matrix core filaments and on perichromosomal filaments at mitosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88:7469–7473PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hochstrasser M, Sedat JW (1987) Three-dimensional organization of Drosophila melanogaster interphase nuclei II Chromosome spatial organization and gene regulation. J Cell Biol 104:1471–1483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ip JY, Nakagawa S (2012) Long non-coding RNAs in nuclear bodies. Develop Growth Differ 54:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ishikawa-Ankerhold HC, Ankerhold R, Drummen GP (2012) Advanced fluorescence microscopy techniques–FRAP, FLIP, FLAP, FRET and FLIM. Molecules 17:4047–4132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ji Y, Tulin AV (2009) Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins modulates splicing. Nucleic Acids Res 37:3501–3513PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson TK, Cockerell FE, McKechnie SW (2011) Transcripts from the Drosophila heat-shock gene hsr-omega influence rates of protein synthesis but hardly affect resistance to heat knockdown. Mol Genet Genomics 285:313–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jolly C, Lakhotia SC (2006) Human sat III and Drosophila hsr omega transcripts: a common paradigm for regulation of nuclear RNA processing in stressed cells. Nucleic Acids Res 34:5508–5514PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klonis N, Rug M, Harper I, Wickham M, Cowman A, Tilley L (2002) Fluorescence photobleaching analysis for the study of cellular dynamics. Eur Biophys J 31:36–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lakhotia SC (2011) Forty years of the 93D puff of Drosophila melanogaster. J Biosci 36:399–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lakhotia SC (2012) Long non-coding RNAs coordinate cellular responses to stress. WIREs RNA 3:779–796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lakhotia SC, Mukherjee T (1982) Absence of novel translation products in relation to induced activity of the 93D puff in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 85:369–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lakhotia SC, Mukherjee T (1984) Specific induction of the 93D puff in polytene nuclei of Drosophila melanogaster by colchicine. Indian J Exp Biol 22:67–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lakhotia SC, Singh AK (1982) Conservation of the 93D puff of Drosophila melanogaster in different species of Drosophila. Chromosoma 86:265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lakhotia SC, Ray P, Rajendra TK, Prasanth KV (1999) The non-coding transcripts of hsr-omega gene in Drosophila: do they regulate trafficking and availability of nuclear RNA-processing factors? Curr Sci 77:553–563Google Scholar
  29. Lakhotia SC, Mallik M, Singh AK, Ray M (2012) The large noncoding hsromega-n transcripts are essential for thermotolerance and remobilization of hnRNPs, HP1 and RNA polymerase II during recovery from heat shock in Drosophila. Chromosoma 121:49–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lippincott-Schwartz J, Snapp E, Kenworthy A (2001) Studying protein dynamics in living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:444–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mallik M, Lakhotia SC (2011) Pleiotropic consequences of misexpression of the developmentally active and stress-inducible non-coding hsromega gene in Drosophila. J Biosci 36:265–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mao YS, Sunwoo H, Zhang B, Spector DL (2011) Direct visualization of the co-transcriptional assembly of a nuclear body by noncoding RNAs. Nat Cell Biol 13:95–101PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Matera AG, Izaguire-Sierra M, Praveen K, Rajendra TK (2009) Nuclear bodies: random aggregates of sticky proteins or crucibles of macromolecular assembly? Dev Cell 17:639–647PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mercer TR, Mattick JS (2013) Structure and function of long noncoding RNAs in epigenetic regulation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:300–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Millet LJ, Gillette MU (2012) Over a century of neuron culture: from the hanging drop to microfluidic devices. Yale J Biol Med 85:501–521PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Misteli T, Caceres JF, Spector DL (1997) The dynamics of a pre-mRNA splicing factor in living cells. Nature 387:523–527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Morcillo G, Diez JL, Carbajal ME, Tanguay RM (1993) HSP90 associates with specific HS puffs (hsr omega) in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila and Chironomus. Chromosoma 102:648–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Morin X, Daneman R, Zavortink M, Chia W (2001) A protein trap strategy to detect GFP-tagged proteins expressed from their endogenous loci in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:15050–15055PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mukherjee T, Lakhotia SC (1979) 3H-uridine incorporation in the puff 93D and in chromocentric heterochromatin of heat shocked salivary glands of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 74:75–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Nickerson JA, Krochmalnic G, Wan KM, Penman S (1989) Chromatin architecture and nuclear RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:177–181PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nissim-Rafinia M, Meshorer E (2011) Photobleaching assays (FRAP & FLIP) to measure chromatin protein dynamics in living embryonic stem cells. J Vis Exp 52: doi:  10.3791/2696
  42. Onorati MC, Lazzaro S, Mallik M, Ingrassia AM, Carreca AP, Singh AK, Chaturvedi DP, Lakhotia SC, Corona DF (2011) The ISWI chromatin remodeler organizes the hsromega ncRNA-containing omega speckle nuclear compartments. PLoS Genet 7:e1002096PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pederson T (2000) Half a century of "the nuclear matrix". Mol Biol Cell 11:799–805PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Phair RD, Misteli T (2000) High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus. Nature 404:604–609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Piccolo LL, Corona D, Onorati MC (2014) Emerging Roles for hnRNPs in post-transcriptional regulation: what can we learn from flies? Chromosoma. doi: 10.1007/s00412-014-0470-0 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Place RF, Noonan EJ (2014) Non-coding RNAs turn up the heat: an emerging layer of novel regulators in the mammalian HS response. Cell Stress Chaperones 19:159–172PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Platani M, Goldberg I, Lamond AI, Swedlow JR (2002) Cajal body dynamics and association with chromatin are ATP-dependent. Nat Cell Biol 4:502–508CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Prasanth KV, Rajendra TK, Lal AK, Lakhotia SC (2000) Omega speckles—a novel class of nuclear speckles containing hnRNPs associated with noncoding hsr-omega RNA in Drosophila. J Cell Sci 113:3485–3497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Reed BH, McMillan SC, Chaudhary R (2009) The preparation of Drosophila embryos for live-imaging using the hanging drop protocol. J Vis Exp. doi: 10.3791/1206 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Saumweber H, Symmons P, Kabisch R, Will H, Bonhoeffer F (1980) Monoclonal antibodies against chromosomal proteins of Drosophila melanogaster: establishment of antibody producing cell lines and partial characterization of corresponding antigens. Chromosoma 80:253–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Singh AK, Lakhotia SC (2012) The hnRNP A1 homolog Hrp36 is essential for normal development, female fecundity, omega speckle formation and stress tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster. J Biosci 37:659–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sleeman JE, Trinkle-Mulcahy L (2014) Nuclear bodies: new insights into assembly/dynamics and disease relevance. Curr Opin Cell Biol 28:76–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Spector DL, Lamond AI (2011) Nuclear speckles. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:a000646PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Szczepny A, Hogarth CA, Young J, Loveland KL (2009) Identification of Hedgehog signaling outcomes in mouse testis development using a hanging drop-culture system. Biol Reprod 80:258–263PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tapadia MG, Lakhotia SC (1997) Specific induction of the hsr omega locus of Drosophila melanogaster by amides. Chromosome Res 5:359–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Yao J, Ardehali MB, Fecko CJ, Webb WW, Lis JT (2007) Intranuclear distribution and local dynamics of RNA polymerase II during transcription activation. Mol Cell 28:978–990CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zimowska G, Paddy MR (2002) Structures and dynamics of Drosophila Tpr inconsistent with a static, filamentous structure. Exp Cell Res 276:223–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Zimowska G, Aris JP, Paddy MR (1997) A Drosophila Tpr protein homolog is localized both in the extrachromosomal channel network and to nuclear pore complexes. J Cell Sci 110:927–944PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Zobeck KL, Buckley MS, Zipfel WR, Lis JT (2010) Recruitment timing and dynamics of transcription factors at the Hsp70 loci in living cells. Mol Cell 40:965–975PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cytogenetics Laboratory, Department of ZoologyBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations